BedianA. G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 198-216.
2.
BrownK. G. (2012). From the editors: Thoughts on effective reviewing. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 152-154.
3.
GoldinC.RouseC. (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “Blind” auditions on female musicians. The American Economic Review, 90, 715-741.
4.
HarrisonD. (2002). Obligations and obfuscations in the review process. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1079-1084.
KerrS. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 769-783.
7.
McDonaldS. (2015). Emperor’s new clothes: The reinvention of peer review as myth. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 264-279.
8.
PriemR.RasheedA. (2006). Reviewing as a vital professional service. In BaruchY.SullivanS. E.SchepmyerH. N. (Eds.), Winning reviews: A guide for evaluating scholarly writing (pp. 27-40). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
RaelinJ. A. (2008). Refereeing the game of peer review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 124-129.
10.
RynesS. L. (2006). Making the most of the review process: Lessons from award-winning authors. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 189-190.
11.
SullivanS. E.BaruchY.SchepmyerH. (2010). The why, what and how of reviewer education: A human capital approach. Journal of Management Education, 34, 393-429.
