CousinsG. (2006). Threshold concepts, troublesome knowledge and emotional capital: An exploration into learning about others. In MeyerJ.LandR. (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 134-147). London, England: Routledge.
2.
FairfieldP. (2011). Dialogue in the classroom. In FairfieldP. (Ed.), Education, dialogue and hermeneutics (pp. 77-90). London, England: Continuum.
3.
HibbertP.CunliffeA. (2013). Responsible management: Engaging moral reflexive practice through threshold concepts. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1993-7
4.
HibbertP.SiedlokF.BeechN. (2014). The role of interpretation in learning practices, in the context of collaboration. Academy of Management Learning & Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amle.2014.0004
5.
JenkinsA. S. (2012). After firm failure: Emotions, learning and re-entry (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Jönköping International Business School. Jönköping, Sweden.
6.
JenkinsA. S.WiklundJ.BrundinE. (2014). Individual responses to firm failure: Appraisals, grief, and the influence of prior failure experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 17-33.
7.
McCormickR. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Some reflections on the nature of learning and knowledge. In LandR.MeyerJ. H. F.SmithJ. (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 51-58). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
8.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to thinking and practising within the disciplines. In RustC. (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice—ten years on (pp. 412-424). Oxford, England: Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
9.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 373-388.
10.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In MeyerJ. H. FLandR. (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 19-32). London, England: Routledge.
11.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR.BaillieC. (Eds.). 2010). Threshold concepts and transformational learning. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
12.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR.DaviesP. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. In Land.R.MeyerJ. H. F.SmithJ. (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 59-74). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
13.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning as transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
PerkinsD. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.
15.
PerkinsD. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In MeyerJ. H. FLandR. (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33-47). London, England: Routledge.
16.
TimmermanB.FeldonD.MaherM.StricklandD.GilmoreJ. (2013). Performance-based assessment of graduate student research skills: Timing, trajectory, and potential thresholds. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 693-710.
17.
TraffordV. (2008). Conceptual frameworks as a threshold concept in doctorateness. In LandR.MeyerJ. H. F.SmithJ. (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 273-288). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
18.
TrankC. Q. (2014). “Reading” evidence-based management: The possibilities of interpretation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 381-395.
19.
WimshurstK. (2011). Applying threshold concepts theory to an unsettled field: An exploratory study in criminal justice education. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 301-314.
20.
WrightA. L.GilmoreA. (2012). Threshold concepts and conceptions: Student learning in introductory management courses. Journal of Management Education, 36, 614-635.
21.
YipJ.RaelinJ. (2012). Threshold concepts and modalities for teaching leadership practice. Management Learning, 43, 333-354.