Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Leading change is an essential skill for managers. Instructors in management education must not only teach theories on effectively leading change but also convince students of the necessity of developing their change leadership skills. Students may underestimate the difficulty of convincing others to work toward change; the authors developed the Change Game as a tool to help students experience the difficulties of leading change and identify opportunities for skill development in the area of change leadership. This 45-minute exercise can be used with a range of courses in management curricula, and it scales well for small to large seated classes. Students are divided into two groups (managers and workers) that must cooperate to complete a task and earn a reward. The exercise simulates resistance to change by giving the workers an incentive to stay with the status quo. Classes typically fail to complete the task, which allows for a lively follow-up discussion on successfully leading change, as well as on topics such as communication, intergroup dynamics, trust, power, and motivation.

Keywords

experiential learning leading change resistance to change role-play

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brewer

M. B.

(1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.

Bruner

J. S.

(1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.

Burnes

(2004). Kurt Lewis and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 977-1002.

Caza

B. B.

Lind

E. A.

(2011). The missed promotion: An exercise demonstrating the importance of organizational justice. Journal of Management Education, 35, 537-563.

Chambers

J. R.

Melnyk

(2006). Why do I hate thee? Conflict misperceptions and intergroup mistrust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1295-1311.

Cronshaw

S. F.

McCulloch

(2008). Reinstating the Lewinian vision: From force field analysis to organizational field assessment. Organizational Development Journal, 26, 89-103.

Dent

E. B.

Goldberg

S. G.

(1999). Challenging “resistance to change.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 25-41.

Festinger

(1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Fiske

S. T.

Taylor

S. E.

(1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Ford

J. D.

Ford

L. W.

D’Amelio

(2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33, 362-377.

11.

Franz

R. S.

(1998). Task interdependence and personal power in teams. Small Group Research, 29, 226-253.

12.

French

J. R. P.

Raven

(1959). The bases of power. In Cartwright

(Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

13.

Frenkel-Brunswik

(1949). Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18, 108-143.

14.

Gilovich

Savitsky

Medvec

V. H.

(1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-346.

15.

Hilton

J. L.

Klein

J. G.

von Hippel

(1991). Attention allocation and impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 548-559.

16.

Holder

M. D.

Hawkins

(2007). The illusion of transparency: Assessment of sex differences in showing and hiding disgust. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 235-243.

17.

Kahneman

Knetsch

J. L.

Thaler

R. H.

(1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206.

18.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

19.

Keysar

Henly

A. S.

(2002). Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness. Psychological Science, 13, 207-212.

20.

Kolb

D. A.

(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

21.

Kotter

J. P.

(1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73, 59-67.

22.

Kotter

J. P.

(1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

23.

Kotter

J. P.

Schlesinger

L. A.

(2008). Choosing strategies for change. Harvard Business Review, 86, 130-139.

24.

Kwiatkowski

(1989). Managing the introduction of new technology. Management Services, 33, 8-12.

25.

Leana

C. R.

Barry

(2000). Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 25, 753-759.

26.

Lewin

(1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; Social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1, 5-41.

27.

Lorsch

J. W.

(1986). Managing culture: The invisible barrier to strategic change. California Management Review, 28, 95-109.

28.

McDonald

K. S.

Mansour-Cole

(2000). Change requires extensive care: An experiential exercise for learners in university and corporate settings. Journal of Management Education, 24, 127-148.

29.

O’Connell

Kung

(2007). The cost of employee turnover. Industrial Management, 49, 14-19.

30.

Piderit

S. K.

(2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25, 783-794.

31.

Ring

P. S.

Bigley

G. A.

D’Aunno

Khanna

(2005). Perspectives on how governments matter. Academy of Management Review, 30, 308-320.

32.

Rollag

Parise

(2005). The bikestuff simulation: Experiencing the challenge of organizational change. Journal of Management Education, 29, 769-787.

33.

Roscigno

V. J.

Hodson

(2004). The organizational and social foundations of worker resistance. American Sociological Review, 69, 14-39.

34.

Schmidt-Wilk

(2010). Evidence: Where scholarship meets artistry. Journal of Management Education, 34, 195-199.

35.

Singh

J. V.

House

R. J.

Tucker

D. J.

(1986). Organizational change and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 587-611.

36.

Singh

J. V.

Tucker

D. J.

House

R. J.

(1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171-193.

37.

Smart

K. L.

Csapo

(2007). Learning by doing: Engaging students through learner-centered activities. Business Communication Quarterly, 70, 451-457.

38.

Stasser

Vaughan

S. I.

Stewart

D. D.

(2000). Pooling of unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 102-116.

39.

Stovall

S. A.

(2010). Recreating the arsenal of Venice: Using experiential activities to teach the history of management. Journal of Management Education, 34, 458-473.

40.

Tjosvold

(1989). Interdependence and power between managers and employees: A study of the leader relationship. Journal of Management, 15, 49-62.

41.

Van Boven

Gilovich

Medvec

V. H.

(2003). The illusion of transparency in negotiations. Negotiation Journal, 19, 117-131.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.11 MB

The Change Game

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material