To fill a critical void in organizational culture pedagogy, the authors present an instructional system that employs the metaphor of a gyroscope to help students understand implicit assumptions in culture research. Working from Martin’s nexus approach to organizational culture and Fairhurst and Putnam’s tripartite theory of organizational discourse, the system in this study illustrates three interpretations of the relationships between culture and communication implicit in the literature. Each relationship is defined, exemplified with culture research, and critiqued. Pedagogical applications of the gyroscope metaphor are also outlined.
Arnesen, D.W., & Weis, W.L. ( 2007). Developing an effective company policy for employee internet and email use. Journal of Culture, Communication and Conflict , 11, 53-65.
2.
Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. ( 1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
3.
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Banks, S.P. ( 1994). Performing public announcements: The case of flight attendants’ work discourse. Text and Performance Quarterly, 14, 253-267.
5.
Berkowitz, H. ( 2004, December 16). Time Warner pays $210 million to settle SEC probe into AOL’s accounting [Electronic version]. Newsday. Retrieved June 18, 2009, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5553/is_200412/ai_n22288458/?tag=content-inner;col1
6.
Boden, D. ( 1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
7.
Cheney, G., & Christensen, L.T. (2001). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 231-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Conrad, C., & Haynes, J. ( 2001). Development of key constructs. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 47-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Cooren, F. ( 2004). The communicative achievement of collective minding: Analysis of board meeting excerpts. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 517-551.
10.
Corman, S. R., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Perspectives on organizational: Finding common ground. New York: Guilford.
11.
Deetz, S.A., Tracy, S.J., & Simpson, J.L. ( 2000). Leading organizations through transition: Communication and cultural change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Dougherty, D.S., & Smythe, M.J. ( 2004). Sensemaking, organizational culture, and sexual harassment . Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 293-317.
13.
Eisenberg, E.M., Murphy, A., & Andrews, L. ( 1998). Openness and decision making in the search for a university provost. Communication Monograph, 65, 1-23.
14.
Eisenberg, E.M., & Riley, P. ( 2001). Organizational culture. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 291-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Emery, C.R., & Barker, K.J. ( 2007). The effect of transactional and transformational leadership styles on the organizational commitment and job satisfaction of customer contact personnel. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, 11, 77-90.
16.
Fairhurst, G.T., & Cooren, F. ( 2004). Organizational language in use: Interaction analysis, conversation analysis and speech act semantics. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 131-152). London: Sage.
17.
Fairhurst, G.T., & Putnam, L. ( 2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14, 5-26.
18.
Glaser, S.R., Zamanou, S., & Hacker, K. ( 1987). Measuring and interpreting organizational culture. Management Communication Quarterly, 1, 173-198.
19.
Hansell, S. ( 2006, February 4). Increasingly, internet’s data trail leads to court [Electronic version]. New York Times. Retrieved February 9, 2006, from http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40914F63D5A0C778CDDAB0894DE404482
20.
Hawhee, D. ( 2002). Agonism and arete. Philosophy and Rhetoric , 35, 185-207.
21.
Hochschild, A.R. ( 1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feelings . Los Angeles: University of California Press.
22.
Hylmö, A., & Buzzanell, P.M. (2002). Telecommuting as viewed through cultural lenses: An empirical investigation of the discourses of utopia, identity, and mystery. Communication Monographs, 69, 329-356.
23.
Keyton, J. ( 2005). Communication and organization culture: A key to understanding work experiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Krizek, R. ( 2005). A meaning-centered approach to consulting: Contributing as an engaged communication scholar. In J. L. Simpson, & P. Shockley-Zalabak (Eds.), Engaging communication, transforming organizations: Scholarship of engagement in action (pp. 127-146). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
25.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. ( 1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Lencioni, P. (2009, May 5). Nonprofits vs. for-profits: Mission and performance. Business Week. Retrieved June 18, 2009, from http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/may2009/ca2009055_713892.htm
27.
Leuchauer, D.L., & Shulman, G.M. ( 1998). Using a metaphor exercise to explore the principles of organizational culture. Journal of Management Education, 22, 736-744.
28.
Lundberg, C.C. ( 1996). Designing organizational culture courses: Fundamental considerations. Journal of Management Education, 20, 11-22.
29.
Martin, J. ( 2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
May, S.K. ( 1993). A communication course in organizational paradigms and metaphors. Communication Education, 42, 234-254.
31.
May, S.K., & Mumby, D.K. ( 2005). Conclusion: Engaging the future of organizational communication theory and research. In S. K. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 263-281). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Morgan, J.M. ( 2004). Organizational cultures and communication. Communication Teacher, 18, 128-131.
33.
Parker, M. ( 2000). Organizational culture and identity: Unity and division at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
34.
Pepper, G.L., & Larson, G.S. ( 2006). Cultural identity tensions in a post-acquisition organization . Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 49-71.
35.
Putnam, L.L., & Conrad, C.R. ( 1999). Teaching organizational communication. In A. L. Vangelisti, J. A. Daly, & G. W. Friedrich (Eds.), Teaching communication: Theory, research, and methods (2nd ed., pp. 141-156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
36.
Rosenfeld, L.B., Richman, J.M., & May, S.K. ( 2004). Information adequacy, job satisfaction, and organizational culture in a dispersed-network organization. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 28-54.
37.
Ross, B., & Rhee, J. ( 2008, November 19). Big three CEOs flew private jets to plead for public funds. American Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved February 20, 2009, from http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Wallstreet/story?id=6285739&page=1
38.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. ( 1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
39.
Scarborough, J.B. ( 1958). The gyroscope: Theory and applications. New York: Interscience.
40.
Schein, E.H. ( 1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Schrodt, P. ( 2002). The relationship between organizational identification and organizational culture: Employee perceptions of culture and identification in a retail sales organization. Communication Studies, 53, 189-202.
42.
Shapiro, E. ( 2006). Enacting organizational culture: Balloons in the air . Communication Teacher, 20, 18-22.
43.
Smith, F., & Keyton, J. ( 2001). Organizational storytelling: Metaphors for relational power and identity struggles. Management Communication Quarterly , 15, 149-182.
44.
Starr-Glass, D. ( 2004). Exploring organizational culture: Teaching notes on metaphor, totem, and archetypal images. Journal of Management Education , 28, 356-371.
45.
Stohl, C. ( 2000). Pedagogy and paradigms: The search for common ground . In S. R. Corman, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground (pp. 183-189). New York: Guilford.
46.
Wrigley, W., Hollister, W.M., & Denhard, W.G. ( 1969). Gyroscopic theory, design, and instrumentation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
47.
Zoller, H. ( 2003). Health on the line: Identity and disciplinary control in employee occupational health and safety discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 118-139.
