This article addresses the concern that business schools are not adequately developing the practical leadership skills that are required in the real world of management. The article begins by discussing the limitations of traditional case methods for teaching behavioral skills. This approach is contrasted with an alternative case method drawn from action inquiry (AI) that uses ongoing student cases to develop more effective leadership behaviors. The student-centered case approach is distinguished from traditional case teaching by tracing an important similarity between AI and Socratic pedagogy. A leadership workshop for evening MBAs that uses AI pedagogy to help students improve their leadership behaviors at work and in the class is also described. The article concludes with a discussion of the significant benefits and challenges associated with helping students develop new leadership behaviors.
Argyris, C. ( 1980). Some limitations of the case method: Experiences in a management development program. Academy of Management Review , 5, 291-298.
2.
Argyris, C. ( 1982). Reasoning, learning and action: Individual and organizational . San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
3.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D.M. ( 1985). Action science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Barnes, L., Christensen, C.R., & Hansen, A. ( 1994). Teaching and the case method (3rd ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
Barr., R. B., & Tagg, J. ( 1995). From teaching to learning; A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27, 12-25.
6.
Bigelow, J.D. ( 1991). Managerial skills: Explorations in practical knowledge . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Bigelow, J. ( 1995). Teaching managerial skills: A critique and future directions . Journal of Management Education, 19, 305-325.
8.
Bigelow, J., Selzer, J., van Buskirk, Hall, J., Schor, S., Garcia, J., & Keleman, K. ( 1999). Management skills in action: Four teaching models. Journal of Management Education, 23, 355-376.
9.
Cohen, A. ( 1976). Beyond simulation: Treating the classroom as an organization . Journal of Management Education, 2, 13-19.
10.
Cohen, A. ( 1989). Some uncomfortable comments on the MBA program: Views from a student and a professor. Journal of Management Education , 13, 72-74.
11.
Corey, R.E. ( 1996). The use of cases in management education (No. 9-376-240). Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
12.
Dehler, G.E., & Edmonds, R.K. ( 2006). Using action research to connect practice to learning: A course project for working management students. Journal of Management Education, 30, 636-669.
13.
Dewing, A.S. ( 1931). An introduction to the use of cases. In C. E. Fraser (Ed.), A case method of instruction (pp. 1-5). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. ( 1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
Greenhalgh, A. ( 2007). Case method teaching as science and art: A metaphoric approach and curricular application. Journal of Management Education, 31,181-194.
16.
Greiner, L.E., Bhambri, A., & Cummings, T.A. (2003). Searching for a strategy to teach strategy. Academy of Management Learning and Education , 2, 402-420.
17.
Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Latham, G.P., & Latham, S. ( 2000). Overlooking theory and research in performance appraisal at one’s peril: Much done, more to do. In C. L. Cooper and E. A. Locke (Eds.), Industrial and organizational psychology (pp.199-249). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20.
Mezoff, R., Cohen, A., & Bradford, D. ( 1979). A dialogue on treating the classroom as an organization . Journal of Management Education, 4, 25-28.
21.
Mintzberg, H., & Gosling, J. ( 2002). Educating managers beyond borders. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 64-76.
22.
Mintzberg, H., & Lampel, J. ( 2001). Do MBAs make better CEOs? Sorry, Dubya, it ain’t necessarily so. Fortune, 143, 244-247.
23.
Peterson, T.O. ( 2004). So you’re thinking of trying problem based learning: Three critical success factors for implementation. Journal of Management Education, 28, 630-647.
24.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. ( 2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 78-95.
25.
Quinn, R.E. ( 2004). Building the bridge as you walk on it: A guide for leading change. San Francisco: Wiley.
26.
Raelin, J. ( 2000). Work-based learning: The new frontier of management development . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Rudolph, J.; Taylor, S., & Foldy, E. ( 2001). Collaborative off-line reflection: A way to develop skill in action science and action inquiry. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of actionresearch (pp. 405-412). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Rynes, S.L., & Trank, C.Q. ( 1999). Behavioral science in the business school curriculum: Teaching in a changing institutional environment. Academy of Management Review, 24, 808-824.
29.
Rynes, S.L., Trank, C.Q., Lawson, A.M., & Ilies, R. ( 2003). Behavioral coursework in business education: Growing evidence of a legitimacy crisis. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 269-283.
30.
Seeskin, K. ( 1987). Dialogue and discovery: A study in Socratic method. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
Senge, Peter.1990. The fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday .
32.
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., & Smith, B. ( 1994). The fifth discipline field book. New York: Doubleday.
33.
Shugan, S.M. ( 2006). Editorial: Save research-abandon the case method of teaching . Marketing Science, 25, 109-115.
34.
Stone, D., Patton, B., & Heen, S. ( 1999). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most. New York: Viking Penguin.
35.
Torbert, W.R. ( 1972). Learning from experience: Toward consciousness. New York: Columbia University Press.
36.
Torbert, W.R. ( 1991). The power of balance: Transforming self, society, and scientific inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Torbert, W.R. & Associates (2004). Action inquiry: The secret of timely and transforming leadership. San Francisco : Berrett-Koehler.
38.
Vlastos, G. ( 1985). Socrates’ disavowal of knowledge. Philosophical Quarterly, 35(138), 1-31.
39.
Whetten, D., & Cameron, K. ( 1983). Management skill training: A needed addition to the management curriculum. Journal of Management Education, 8, 10-15.
40.
Whetten, D., & Cameron, K. ( 2007). Developing management skills. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
Willcoxson, L.E. ( 2006). "It’s not fair!" Assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork. Journal of Management Education, 30, 798-808.
