Bainbridge, B.S. (2002, March). Management education's role in the developing world: Reflections on experience and dialogue-Workshop proposal. Paper presented at the Western Academy of Management, Lima, Perú.
2.
Brenkert, G.G. (2002). Entrepreneurship, ethics and the good society . In R. E. Freeman & S. Venkataraman (Eds.), Ruffin series in business ethics #3, ethics and the entrepreneur (pp. 5-43). Charlottesville, VA: Olsson Center for Applied Ethics.
3.
Carland, J.W., Carland, J.C., & Koiranen, M. (1997, June 21-24). The exportation of the American model of entrepreneurship: Reality or illusion? A comparative trait study of American and Finnish entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the International Conference of Small Business, San Francisco .
4.
Carter, J.R., & Irons, M.D. (1991). Are economists different, and if so, why?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 171-177.
5.
Collier, P. (2007). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
Grey, C. (2002). What are business schools for? On silence and voice in management education. Journal of Management Education , 26, 496-511.
7.
Grey, C., & Mitev, N. (1995). Management education: A polemic. Management Learning, 26, 73-90.
8.
Hemment, J. (1998). Colonization of liberation: The paradox of NGOs in postsocialist states. Anthropology of East Europe Review , 16(1), 31-39.
9.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences-International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
International Labour Organisation. (2002). Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organisation .
11.
Kirchgassner, G. (2005). (Why) are economists different? European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 543-562.
12.
Krishna, A. (2004). Escaping poverty and becoming poor: Who gains, who loses, and why?World Development, 32, 121-136.
13.
Marwell, G., & Amer, R.E. (1981). Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics, 15, 295-310.
14.
Mir, A. (2003). The hegemonic discourse of management texts. Journal of Management Education, 27, 734-738.
15.
Monaghan, C.H. (2003). Silence, voice, and resistance in management education stream: Critical management education: From pedagogy to activism. Paper presented at the conference of the critical management studies . Retrieved May 20, 2008, from http://www.management.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/2003/abstracts/activism/Monaghan.pdf
16.
Moore, M. (1997). Societies, polities and capitalists in developing countries: A literature survey. Journal of Development Studies , 33, 287-363.
17.
Narayan-Parker, D. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us?New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Peredo, A.M., & Chrisman, J.J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31, 309-328.
19.
Peredo, A.M., & McLean, M. (2007, March). Recognizing economic, cultural and entrepreneurial diversity: A conceptual foundation for "indigenous development". Paper presented at the annual conference of Western Academy of Management, Missoula, MT.
20.
Shuman, M.H. (2000). Going local: Creating self-reliant communities in a global age. New York: Routledge .
21.
Stiglitz, J.E. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: Norton.
22.
Tipps, D.C. (1973). Modernization theory and the study of national societies: A critical perspective. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15, 199-226.
23.
Trainer, F.E.T. (2002). Development, charity and poverty: The appropriate development perspective. International Journal of Social Economics , 29, 54-72.
24.
UN Global Compact. (2007). The principles for responsible management education. Retrieved 19 February, 2008, from http://www.efmd.org/attachments//tmpl_1_art_051012qnis_att_070718dbuf.pdf
25.
United Nations. (2005). The inequality predicament: Report on the world social situation 2005. New York: Author.
26.
Weller, C.E., & Hersh, A. (2002). The long and short of it: Global liberalization, poverty and inequality (Economic Policy Institute Technical Paper No. 206). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
