This article demonstrates how the system archetype “drifting goals” can be used in the classroom to explore ethical dilemmas. System archetypes provide a framework that shifts the focus from seeing ethical dilemmas as stemming solely from the acts of individuals to exploring the systemic structures that are responsible for generic patterns of behavior over time. The use of a system archetype in the classroom is an important pedagogical approach and communication device to encourage systemic thinking. The drifting goals archetype exposes students to new ways of thinking about ethical problems and the structures that create them.
Anderson, V., & Johnson, L. (1997). Systems thinking basics: From concepts to causal loops. Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Communications.
2.
Aronson, D. (1998). Overview of systems thinking. Thinking Page. Available at www.thinking.net
3.
Bardoel, E. A., & Haslett, T. (2004). Success to the successful: The use of systems thinking tools in teaching OB. Organization Management Journal, 1(2), 1-12.
4.
Carver, C., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Scaling back goals and recalibration of the affect system are processes in normal adaptive self-regulation: Understanding “response shift” phenomena. Social Science and Medicine, 50(12), 1715-1722.
5.
Christie, P. M. J., Kwon, I-W. G., Stoeberl, P. A., & Baumhart, R. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 263-287.
6.
Daft, R. (2003). Management (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western (division of Thomson Learning).
7.
Daft, R. L., & Noe, R. A. (2001). Organizational behavior. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing (division of Thomson Learning).
8.
Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2/3), 245-256.
9.
Goekler, J. (2003). Teaching for the future: Systems thinking and sustainability. Green Teacher, 70, 8-14.
10.
Haslett, T. (2001). Experiences and reflections on the transition from classroom to practice. Systems Dynamics Review, 17(2), 161-170.
11.
Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. (2004). Organizational behavior (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson (South-Western).
12.
Hirsch, G. C., & Immediato, S. (1999). Microworlds and generic structures as resources for integrating care and improving health. System Dynamics Review, 15(3), 315-330.
13.
Kim, D. H. (1990). A palette of systems thinking tools. Systems Thinker, 1(3), 3-4.
14.
Kim, D. H. (1992). Toolbox reprint series: Systems archetypes 1. Cambridge, MA: Pegasus Communications.
15.
King, J., & Acklin, D. (1995). Creating common ground: A lesson from the past. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 1-16.
16.
Lane, D., & Smart, C. (1996). Reinterpreting“genericstructure”: Evolution, application and limitations of a concept. System Dynamics Review, 12, 87-120.
17.
Luthans, F. (2002). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits: Confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
19.
Morris, S. A., & McDonald, R. A. (1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 715-726.
20.
Robbins, S. P., Millett, B., & Waters-Marsh, T. (2004). Organisational behaviour. Frenchs Forest, New South Wales: Pearson Education Australia.
21.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Milsons Point, New South Wales: Random House Australia.
22.
Senge, P. M., Ross, R., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., & Smith, B. (1994). The fifth discipline field book. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
23.
Thornton, B., Peltier, G., & Perreault, G. (2004). Systems thinking: A skill to improve student achievement. Clearing House, 77(5), 222-227.
24.
Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1/2), 33-42.
25.
Wolstenholme, E. F. (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 19(1), 7-26.
26.
Wrosch, C., Scheier, M., Miller, G., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subject well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(12), 1494-1512.
