In studying online learning, researchers should examine three critical interactions: instructor-student, student-student, and student-content. Student-content interaction may include a wide variety of pedagogical tools (e.g., streaming media, PowerPoint, and hyperlinking). Other factors that can affect the perceived quality of online learning include distance education advantages (e.g., work and family flexibility) and antecedent personal characteristics (e.g., experience and gender). The study indicated that instructor-student interaction is most important, twice that of student-student interaction; that some student-content interaction is significantly related to perceived learning; that antecedent variables are not significant; and that distance education advantages/flexibility, although significant, are less important than other interactions.
Ahern, T. C., & El-Hindi, A. E. (2000). Improving the instructional congruency of a computer-mediated small-group discussion: A case study in design and delivery. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 385-400.
2.
Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 159-174.
3.
Alavi, M., & Gallupe, R. B. (2003). Using information technology in learning: Case studies in business and management education programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 139-153.
4.
Alavi, M., Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1995). Using IT to re-engineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning. MIS Quarterly, 19, 293-312.
5.
Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., & Vogel, D. R. (1997). Using information technology to add value to management education. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1310-1333.
6.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
7.
Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a Web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31-43.
9.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000a). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction in Internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
10.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000b). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory comparison of class discussion patterns and student learning in an a synchronous Internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24(2), 207-227.
11.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in Web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42-54.
12.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2002). Managing the on-line classroom: A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of Web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 203-223.
13.
Arbaugh, J. B. (in press). Is there an optimal design for online MBA courses?Academy of Management Learning and Education.
14.
Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2001). Class section size, perceived classroom characteristics, instructor experience, and student learning and satisfaction with Web-based courses: A study and comparison of two online MBA programs. In D. Nagao (Ed.), Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings [CD-ROM] (pp. A1-A6).
15.
Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with Web-based courses: An exploratory study of two MBA programs. Management Learning, 33, 231-247.
16.
Arbaugh, J. B., & Rau, B. L. (2002, November). Characteristics of effective Web-based instruction: A study of human resources and management MBA courses. Paper presented at the third Conference on Innovative Teaching in Human Resources and Industrial Relations, Columbus, OH.
17.
Atkinson, M., & Kydd, C. (1997). Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28(2), 53-62.
18.
Bailey, E. K., & Coltar, M. (1994). Teaching via the Internet. Communication Education, 43(2), 184-193.
19.
Baugher, D., Varanelli, A., & Weisbord, E. (2003). Student hits in an Internet-supported course: How can instructors use them and what do they mean?Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1, 159-179.
20.
Benbunan-Fich, R. (2002). Improving education and training with information technology. Communications of the ACM, 45(6), 94-99.
21.
Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2001). A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. ALN mediated teamwork. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1-10.
22.
Berger, N. S. (1999). Pioneering experiences in distance learning: Lessons learned. Journal of Management Education, 23, 684-690.
23.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
Bowman, L. (2001). Interaction in the classroom. Teachers Net Gazette, 2(7), 2-7.
25.
Brower, H. H. (2003). On emulating classroom discussion in a distance-delivered OBHR course: Creating an online community. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(1), 22-36.
26.
Card, K. A. (2000). Providing access to graduate education using computer-mediated communication. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 235-245.
27.
Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 143-163.
28.
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
29.
Churchill, G., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491-504.
30.
Confessore, N. (1999, October 4). The virtual university. The New Republic, pp. 26-28.
31.
Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169-189.
32.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to manager information processing and organizational design. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
33.
Davis, D. J. (2003). Developing text for Web-based instruction. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 287-295). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Dillon, C. L., Hengst, H. R., & Zoller, D. (1991). Instructional strategies and student involvement in distance education: A study of the Oklahoma televised instruction system. Journal of Distance Education, 6(1), 28-41.
35.
Dumont, R. A. (1996). Teaching and learning in cyberspace. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 39(4), 192-204.
36.
du Toit, M., & du Toit, S. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User’s guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
37.
Dyck, J. L., & Smither, J. A. (1994). Age differences in computer anxiety: The role of computer experience, gender, and education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10, 239-248.
38.
Easton, S. S. (2003). Clarifying the instructor’s role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52, 87-105.
39.
Educators divided over rush for Internet learning. (1999, May 5). Navy Times, p. E5.
40.
Ellram, L. M., & Easton, L. (1999). Purchasing education on the Internet. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(1), 11-19.
41.
Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of Web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 443-457.
42.
Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
43.
Gains, J. (1999). Electronic mail: A new style of communication or just a new medium? An investigation into the text features of e-mail. English for Special Purposes, 18(1), 81-101.
44.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105.
45.
Gibson, C. C. (1996). Toward emerging technologies and distributed learning: Challenges and change. American Journal of Distance Education, 10, 47-49.
46.
Goldberger, A. S. (1971). Econometrics and psychometrics: A survey of communalities. Psychometrika, 36, 83-107.
47.
Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40-53.
48.
Greco, J. (1999). Going the distance for MBA candidates. Journal of Business Strategy, 20(3), 30-34.
49.
Guernsey, L. (1998). Colleges debate the wisdom of having on-campus students enroll in online classes. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(29), A29-A30.
50.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Interaction analysis of a global online debate and the development of a constructivist interaction analysis model for computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 395-429.
51.
Hair, J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
Hardy, D. W., & Boaz, M. H. (1997). Learner development: Beyond the technology. In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.), Teaching and learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs (pp. 41-48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Hayduk, L. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
54.
Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1996). Effects of communication mode and pre-discussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Information Systems Research, 7, 451-465.
55.
Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56.
Hiltz, S. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2003). Improving quantitative research methods in studies of asynchronous learning networks. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (Vol. 4, pp. 59-72). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for OnLine Education.
57.
Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., Turoff, M., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2000). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.aln.org/ainweb/journal/Vol4_issue2/le/hiltz/le-hiltz.htm
58.
Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 44-49.
59.
Hislop, G. W. (1999). Anytime, anyplace learning in an online graduate professional degree program. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 385-390.
60.
Hughes, M. A., Price, R. L., & Mares, D. M. (1986). Linking theory construction and theory testing: Models with multiple indicators of latent variables. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 128-145.
61.
Hutchins, H. (2003). Instructional immediacy and the seven principles: Strategies for facilitating online courses. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/distance/ojdla/fall63/hutchins63.html
62.
Jetton, T. L. (2003-2004). Using computer-mediated discussion to facilitate preservice teachers’ understanding of literacy assessment and instruction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 171-191.
63.
Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26.
64.
Jones, H. J., & Wolf, P. J. (2001). Teaching a graduate content area reading course via the Internet: Confessions of an experienced neophyte. Reading Improvement, 38(1), 2-9.
65.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL8: A guide to the program and applications (3rd ed.). Chicago: SSI Software.
66.
Larson, P. D. (2002). Interactivity in an electronically delivered marketing course. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 265-269.
67.
Lee, J., Hong, N. L., & Ling, N. L. (2001). An analysis of students’ preparation for the virtual learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 231-242.
68.
Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19, 265-291.
69.
Marks, R. B., & Sibley, S. D. (2004). Distance education and learning styles: Some disappointing results. Paper presented at the Applied Business Research Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
70.
Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). A model of business school students’ acceptance of a Web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 7-26.
71.
Mason, R. (1991). Analyzing computer conferencing interactions. International Journal of Computers in Adult Education and Training, 2(3), 161-173.
72.
May, S. (1994). Women’s experiences as distance learners: Access and technology. Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 81-98.
73.
May, S. (1995, March/April). Rediscovering an old technology. Adult Learning, 4, 17-19.
74.
May, S. (1996). Distance learning: Its impact on women. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 63(2), 39-44.
75.
Mayadas, F., Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C. (2002). Introduction. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education (pp. 7-11). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for OnLine Education.
76.
Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
77.
Menzel, K. E., & Carrell, L. J. (1999). The impact of gender and immediacy of willingness to talk and perceived learning. Communication Education, 48, 31-40.
78.
Merisotis, J. P. (1999). What’s the difference?—College-level distance and classroom-based education. Change, 31(3), 12-18.
79.
Moore, M. G. (1976). A model of independent study. Chapter II in Investigation of the interaction between the cognitive style of field independence and attitudes to independent study among adult learners who use correspondence independent study and self directed independent study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Ann Arbor, MI. (University Microfilms No. 76-20, 127)
80.
Moore, M. G. (1987). Print media. In J. A. Niemi & D. D. Gooler (Eds.), Technologies for learning outside the classroom. New directions for continuing education (pp. 41-50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
81.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-4.
82.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
83.
Myers, S. A., Zhong, M., & Guan, S. (1998). Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom. Communication Studies, 49, 240-253.
84.
Nadkarni, S. (2003). Instructional methods and mental models of students: An empirical investigation. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(4), 335-351.
85.
Neumann, P. G. (1998). Risks of e-education. Communications of the ACM, 41(10), 136.
86.
Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. J. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 427-440.
87.
Oliver, R. L., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1988). Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 495-507.
88.
Oliver, R., & Omari, A. (2001). Student responses to collaborating and learning in a Web-based environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 34-47.
89.
Parnell, J. A., & Carraher, S. (2003). The Management Education by Internet Readiness (MEBIR) Scale: Developing a scale to assess personal readiness for Internet-mediated management education. Journal of Management Education, 27, 431-446.
90.
Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference: A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Retrieved from www.ihep.com/PUB.htm
91.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401-426.
92.
Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 162-177.
93.
Rice, R. E. (1984). The new media: Communication, research, and technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
94.
Roblyer, M. D. (1996). The constructivist/objectivist debate: Implications for instructional technology research. Learning and Leading With Technology, 24(2), 12-16.
95.
Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(4), 33-48.
96.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 197-211.
97.
Rovai, A. P. (2004). A constructivist approach to online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79-93.
98.
Sanders, D. W., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. I. (2001). Student attitudes toward Web-enhanced instruction in an introductory biology course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 251-262.
99.
Shapley, P. (2000). Online education to develop complex reasoning skills in organic chemistry. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2). Retrieved December 1, 2002, from http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/index.asp
100.
Shea, P. J., Fredericksen, E. E., Pickett, A. M., & Pelz, W. E. (2004). Faculty development, student satisfaction, and reported learning in the SUNY learning network. In T. M. Duffy & J. R. Kirkley (Eds.), Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education (pp. 343-377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
101.
Sherry, A. C., Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1998). Assessing distance learners’ satisfaction with instruction: A quantitative and a qualitative measure. American Journal of Distance Education, 12(3), 4-28.
102.
Smith, G. G., Ferguson, D. L., & Caris, M. (2001). Teaching college courses: Online vs. face-to-face. T.H.E. Journal, 28(9), 18-24.
103.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104.
Strauss, S. G. (1996). Getting a clue: Communication media and information distribution effects on group process and performance. Small Group Research, 27(1), 115-142.
105.
Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom. Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 805-818.
106.
Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education Communication and Information, 2(1), 23-49.
107.
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (pp. 13-45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for OnLine Education.
108.
Thach, E. C., & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43(1), 57-79.
109.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167-187.
110.
Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 204-212.
111.
Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (1995). Software design and the future of the virtual classroom. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 4, 197-215.
112.
Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (2001). Effectively managing large enrollment courses: A case study. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Online education, Vol. 2. Proceedings of the 2000 summer workshop on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 55-77). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for OnLine Education.
113.
Twigg, C. (2000). Distance education: An oxymoron?The Learning MarketSpace. Retrieved July 1, 2000, from http://www.center.rpi.edu/Lforum/lm/july00.html
114.
Wagner, E. D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 19-26.
115.
Wang, M., Sierra, C., & Folger, T. (2003). Building a dynamic online learning community among adult learners. Education Media International, 40(1/2), 49-61.
116.
Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a Web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28, 975-996.
117.
Weigel, V. B. (2002). Deep learning for a digital age. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
118.
What’s new at LTDE? (2003). Learning Technology and Distance Education. Retrieved September 9, 2003, from http://wiscinfo.doit.wisc.edu/ltde/
119.
Whipp, J., & Schweizer, H. (2000). Meeting psychological needs in Web-based courses for teachers. Journal of Computing and Teacher Education, 17(1), 26-31.
120.
Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1997). Gender differences in computer-related attitudes and behavior: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 1-22.
121.
Wolfe, J. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and classroom discourse: Communication patterns of Hispanic and White students in networked classrooms. Written Communication, 17(4), 491-520.
122.
Woods, R. H., Jr. (2002). How much communication is enough in online courses?—Exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal email and learners’ perceptions of and participation in online learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 377-394.
123.
Yoo, Y., Kanawattanachai, P., & Citurs, A. (2002). Forging into the wired wilderness: A case study of a technology-mediated distributed discussion-based class. Journal of Management Education, 26, 139-163.
124.
Zhao, J. J., Alexander, M. W., Perreault, H., & Waldman, L. (2003). Impact of information technologies on faculty and students in distance education. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 45(1), 17-33.
