Business schools often assign student group projects to enhance student learning of course content and to build teamwork skills. However, the characteristics of effective collaborative learning tasks, including group goals and individual accountability, are often not found in student group projects assigned in business classes. The current research found that content learning was actually inhibited by the use of a group project. The results indicate that the students who completed a project in groups learned less of the project-related content than did students who completed a shortened version of the project individually. The characteristics of business school group projects, peer-learning projects, and group projects in the workplace are compared and contrasted. Implications for program and course design are discussed.
Ausubel, D. E. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Norwell, MA: Kluwer
2.
Academic. Bacon, D. R. (2003). Assessing learning outcomes: A comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 31-36.
3.
Bacon, D. R., & Novotny, J. (2002). Exploring achievement striving as a moderator of the grading leniency effect. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 4-14.
4.
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Anderson, E. S. (2001). Methods of assigning players to teams: A review and novel approach. Simulation and Gaming, 32, 6-17.
5.
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Silver, W. S. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23, 467-488.
6.
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Stewart-Belle, S. (1998). Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20, 63-71.
7.
Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory (2nd ed.). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. Retrieved from http://ericae.net/irt/baker/
8.
Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593-604.
9.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman, Green.
10.
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Bolton, M. K. (1999). The role of coaching in student teams: A “just-in-time” approach to learning. Journal of Management Education, 23, 233-250.
12.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Bowen, D. D. (1998). Team frames: The multiple realities of the team. Journal of Management Education, 22, 95-103.
14.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
15.
Comer, D. R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48, 647-667.
16.
Deeter-Schmelz, D. R., Kennedy, K. N., & Ramsey, R. P. (2002). Enriching our understanding of student team effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 114-124.
17.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497-509.
18.
Goldschmid, M. L. (1971). The learning cell: An instructional innovation. Learning and Development, 2, 1-6.
19.
Gosenpud, J. J., & Washbush, J. B. (1991). Predicting simulation performance: Differences between individuals and groups. In W. J. Wheatley & J. Gosenpud (Eds.), Developments in business simulation and experiential exercises (pp. 44-48). Stillwater, OK: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning.
20.
Herman, E. D., Keldsen, S. Z., & Miller, J. G. (2001). States of development in collaborative learning: Administrative perspectives on teaming in MBA programs. Boston: Boston University School of Management Center for Team Learning.
21.
Hernandez, S. A. (2002). Team learning in a marketing principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 73-85.
22.
Kahn, W. (1995). Group process checkpoints for team learning in the classroom. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14, 310-326.
23.
Kimber, D. (1996). Collaborative learning in management education: Issues, benefits, problems and solutions: A literature review. ultiBASE. Retrieved from http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/june96/kimbe1.htm
24.
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
25.
Mallinger, M. (1998). Maintaining control in the classroom by giving up control. Journal of Management Education, 22, 472-483.
26.
McKeachie, W. J. (1990). Research on college teaching: The historical background. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 189-200.
27.
McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (9th ed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
28.
McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y., Smith, D. A. F., & Sharma, R. (1990). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post Secondary Teaching and Learning.
29.
Mesch, D. J. (1991). The jigsaw technique: A way to establish individual accountability in group work. Journal of Management Education, 15, 355-358.
30.
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. E. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Michaelsen, L. K., & Black, R. H. (1994). Building learning teams: The key to harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In S. Kadel & J. Keehner (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 65-81). State College, PA: National Center for Teaching Learning and Assessment.
32.
Mundell, B., & Pennarola, F. (1999). Shifting paradigms in management education: What happens when we take groups seriously?Journal of Management Education, 23, 663-683.
33.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 78-95.
35.
Reichardt, C. S. (1979). The statistical analysis of data from nonequivalent group designs. In T. D. Cook & D. T. Campbell (Eds.), Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings (pp. 147-205). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
Schomberg, S. F. (1986, April). Involving high ability students in learning groups. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
37.
Shaw, J. B., Fisher, C. D., & Southey, G. N. (1999). Evaluating organizational behavior teaching innovations: More rigorous designs, more relevant criteria, and an example. Journal of Management Education, 23, 509-536.
38.
Slavin, R. E. (1988). Cooperative learning and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 46, 31-33.
39.
Strijbos, J. W. (2000). A classification model for group-based learning. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://kurs.nks.no/eurodl/eurodlen/index.html
40.
Strong, J. T., & Anderson, R. E. (1990). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 61-67.
41.
Webb, N. J., & Grib, T. F. (1967). Teaching process as a learning experience: The experimental use of student-led groups (Final Report, HE-000-882). Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
42.
Wildt, A. R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1978). Analysis of covariance (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-012). Beverly Hills, CA; London: Sage.
43.
Williams, D. L., Beard, J. D., & Rymer, J. (1991). Team projects: Achieving their full potential. Journal of Marketing Education, 13, 45-53.
44.
Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1998). BIGSTEPS computer program for Rasch measurement (version 2.82), Chicago: MESA Press. Available from www.winsteps.com/bigsteps.htm
45.
Wright, B. D., Linacre, J. M., Gustafson, J. E., & Martin-Löf, P. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
46.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.
