This article describes two experiential exercises relating Jungian psychological types to organizational ideals and perceptions of office politics. The first exercise explores the relationship between Jungian psychological types and organizational ideals. The second exercise explores how these organizational ideals influence perceptions of organizational politics. The exercises can be used separately or combined and are appropriate for a variety of management education settings. Guidelines are presented for administering the exercises and interpreting results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barger, N. J., & Kirby, L. K. (1995). The challenge of change in organizations. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
2.
Chanin, M. N., & Schneer, J. A. (1984). A study of the relationship between the Jungian personality dimensions and conflict-handling behavior. Human Relations, 37(10), 863-879.
3.
Comer, D. R. (1992). Preparing students to determine personally appropriate political behavior. Journal of Management Education, 16(3), 327-340.
4.
Dawson, P., & Dawson, P., III. (1986). Teaching political influence experientially. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 11(3), 133-135.
5.
Demarest, L. (1997). Looking at type in the workplace. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
6.
Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93-116.
7.
Fitzgerald, C., & Kirby, L. (Eds.). (1997). Developing leaders: Research and applications in psychological type and leadership development. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
8.
Fleming, J. E. (1985). A suggested approach for linking decision styles with business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 137-144.
9.
Fournier, V. (1997). Graduates’ construction systems and career development. Human Relations, 50(4), 363-391.
10.
Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1996). Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to study managers: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(1), 45-83.
11.
Hammer, A. L., & Huszczo, G. E. (1996). Teams. In A. L. Hammer (Ed.), MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (pp. 81-103). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12.
Henderson, J. C., & Nutt, P. C. (1980). The influence of decision style on decision-making behavior. Management Science, 26(4), 371-386.
13.
Hunt, R. G., Krzystofiak, F. J., Meindl, J. R., & Yousry, A. M. (1989). Cognitive style and decision making. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Performance, 44, 436-453.
14.
Martin, C. (1995). Looking at type and careers. Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
15.
Mitroff, I. I., Barabba, V. P., & Kilmann, R. H. (1977). The application of behavioral and philosophical technologies to strategic planning: A case study of a large federal agency. Management Science, 24(1), 44-58.
16.
Mitroff, I. I., & Kilmann, R. H. (1975). Stories managers tell: A new tool for organizational problem-solving. Management Review, 64(7), 18-28.
17.
Mitroff, I. I., & Kilmann, R. H. (1976). On organizational stories: An approach to the design and analysis of organization through myths and stories. In R. H. Kilmann, L. R. Pondy, & D. P. Slevin (Eds.), The management of organizational design (Vol. 1, pp. 189-207). New York: Elsevier North-Holland.
18.
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
19.
Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1993). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black. (Original work published in 1980)
20.
Ramsoomair, F. (1994). Relating theoretical concepts to life in the classroom: Applying the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 111-116.
21.
Robey, D., & Taggart, W. (1981). Measuring managers’ minds: The assessment of style in human information processing. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 375-383.
22.
Slocum, J. W., & Hellriegel, D. (1983, July/August). A look at how managers’ minds work. Business Horizons, 26, 58-68.
23.
Today’s college kids are naïve about the workplace. (1987, May 12). Wall Street Journal, p. 1.
