Critics of the case method have argued that cases too frequently overempha-size the formal and rational aspects of organizational functioning. Responding to these concerns, Harvard Business School (HBS) announced a commitment to broaden case content. In this study, narrative analysis is used to investigate the content of the 36 most popular HBS cases of 1996. It reveals that these cases continue to reflect the rational domain bias that engendered the original criticism. The authors provide guidance to both case users and writers through the identification of four perceptual hazards (metathemes) that characterize the rationality bias.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
Bartz, D., & Calabrese, R. (1991). Enhancing graduate school business programs. Journal of Management Development, 10(1), 26-33.
3.
Behrman, J., & Levin, R. (1984). Are business schools doing their job? Harvard Business Review, 62, 140-146.
4.
Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
Bludent, R. G. (1993). The real case method: A response to critics of business education. Case Research Journal, 13, 106-119.
6.
Boje, D. (1991). The story telling organization: A study of story performance in an office supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106-126.
7.
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1984). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Bolman, L., & Granell, E. (1999, December 9-11). Versatile leadership: A comparative analysis of reframing in Venezuelan managers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Ibero American Academy of Management, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
9.
Bridges, W. (1994). Job shift: How to prosper in a workplace without jobs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Burnett, S. (1992). Can management education deliver what business needs. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 32-33.
11.
Corey, E. R. (1976). The use of cases in management education. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications.
12.
Dass, P. (1999). Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 68-81.
13.
Drucker, P. (1992). Managing for the future. New York: Truman-Taltey Books.
14.
Drucker, P. (2001, November 3). The next society. Economist, 3-20.
15.
Eccles, R. G., & Nohria, N. (1992). Beyond the hype: Rediscovering the essence of management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
17.
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1994). Small group decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Hammond, J. (1980). Learning by the case method. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Heise, D. (1992). Ethnography (2nd ed.). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
20.
Hertz, R., & Imber, J. B. (Eds.). (1995). Studying elites using qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Hilmer, F. G., & Donaldson, L. (1996). The trivialization of management. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 26-37.
22.
Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aaronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 596-692). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
Kelly, F. J., & Kelly, H. M. (1986). What they really teach you at the Harvard Business School. New York: Warner Books.
24.
Kets de Vries, M .F. R., & Miller, D. (1987). Interpreting organizational texts. Journal of Management Studies, 24(3), 233-247.
25.
Keys, B., & Wolfe, J. (1988). Management education and development: Current issues and emerging trends. Journal of Management, 14(2), 205-230.
26.
Lee, W. B., & Skarke, M. G. (1996). Value-added fads: From passing fancy to eternal truths. Journal of Management Consulting, 9(2), 10-15.
27.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Linder, J. (1990). Writing cases: Tips and pointers. Boston: Harvard Business School Publications.
29.
Manning, P. K., & Cullum-Swan, B. (1994). Narrative, content and semiotic analysis. In N. K. Denzion & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 284-321). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
McHenry, S. (1986). A better MBA. Ms Magazine, 15(4), 56-58.
32.
Mintzberg, H. (1976). Planning on the left side and managing on the right. Harvard Business Review, 54(4), 49-55.
33.
Mintzberg, H. (1996). Musings on management. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 61-68.
34.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Nussbaum, B., & Beam, A. (1986). Remaking the Harvard B-School. Business Week, 29(38), 54-59.
36.
Oxford American Dictionary. (1980). New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Ratliff, R. L. (1990). An argument for case research. Case Research Journal, 10, 1-15.
38.
Simon, H. (1977). Models of discovery. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
39.
Wetlaufer, S. (1999). Organizing for empowerment: An interview with AES's Roger Sant and Dennis Bakke. Harvard Business Review, 97(1), 112-123.
40.
Whitehead, A. N. (1925). Science in the modern world. New York: Free Press.
