Based on a qualitative study and a follow-up survey of 503 Singapore management students, the authors discuss the emergence of a new cultural attitude, kiasuism, one that has roots in the Chinese concept of face. The term kiasu, literally meaning “afraid to lose” in the Chinese Hokkien dialect, may lead students either to put in more effort so as to gain an upper hand over others (kiasu-positive) or to act in ways to prevent others from getting ahead of them (kiasu-negative). The impact of this attitude on in-class and out-of-class feedback-seeking behaviors is examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advisory Council of Youths
. (1989). Report of the Advisory Council on Youths. Singapore: The Council.
2.
Ashford, S. J.
(1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 465-487.
3.
Ashford, S. J.
, & Cummings, L. L. (1983).Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 370-398.
4.
Belensky, M. F.
, Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, L. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic.
5.
Bond, M. H.
, & Lee, P.W.H. (1981). Face-saving in Chinese culture: A discussion and experimental study of Hong Kong students. In A.Y.C. King & R.P.L. Lee (Eds.), Social life and development in Hong Kong (pp. 288-305). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
6.
Campbell, J. P.
, & Dunnette, M. D. (1968).Effectiveness of T-group experience in managerial training and development. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 73-104.
7.
Carner, R. L.
(1963).Levels of questioning. Education, 83, 554-550.
8.
Ching, G.
(1973). Chinese proverbs. Manila, the Philippines: National Book Store.
9.
Chua, C. C.
(1989, June 23). Kiasuism is not all bad. The Straits Times.
10.
Colaizzi, P. F.
(1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48-71). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Dillion, J. T.
(1986).Student questions and individual learning. Educational Theory, 36, 333-341.
12.
Dougherty, T. W.
, & Wall, J. A. (1991). Teaching in China during the age of reform. Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 232-243.
13.
Earley, P. C.
(1997). Face, harmony, and social structure. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Foo, C. P.
(1991, November 21). For every kiasu Singaporean there is a Par Chup She Hongkonger. The Straits Times.
15.
Frijida, N. H.
, & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 23-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Gall, M.
(1970).The use of questions in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 40, 707-721.
17.
Gao, G.
, Ting-Toomey, S., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1996). Chinese communication processes. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
18.
Good, T. L.
, Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H., & Emerson, H. (1987).Student passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology of Education, 60, 181-199.
19.
Gudykunst, W.
, Stewart, L., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1985). Communication, culture, and organizational processes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Hackman, J. R.
, & Oldham, G. R. (1976).Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
21.
Harrington, C. L.
(1992). Talk of embarrassment, exploring the taboo—repression—denial hypothesis. Symbolic Interaction, 15(2), 203-225.
22.
Ho, D.Y.F.
(1976).On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-884.
23.
Ho, J.T.S.
, Ang, C. E., Loh, J., & Ng, I. (1998). A preliminary study of kiasuism behavior—Is it unique in Singapore?Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(5/6), 359-370.
24.
Hofstede, G.
(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Hofstede, G.
(1993).Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7, 81-94.
26.
Holmes, B. H.
(1997). Want participation? Have them “Vote with their Feet”!Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 117-120.
27.
Hu, H. C.
(1944).The Chinese concept of “face.”American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64.
28.
Ilgen, D. R.
, Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979).Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
29.
Joreskorg K. G.
, & Sorbom, D. (1989). Lisrel 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: Joreskorg and Sorbom/SPSS.
30.
Kagda, S.
(1993, July 17). Totally opposing traits. The Business Times, Executive Lifestyle, p. 2-2.
31.
Karabenick, S. A.
, & Knapp, J. R. (1991).Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 221-230.
32.
Kluckhohn, F.
, & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in values orientations. Evanston, IL: Peterson.
33.
Morrison, E. W.
, & Bies, R. J. (1991). Impression management in the feedback-seeking process: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 522-541.
34.
Newcastle, H.
(1970). A study of teachers’ classroom questioning and responding techniques. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 079 260)
35.
Northcraft, G. B.
, & Ashford, S. J. (1990).The preservation of self in everyday life: The effects of performance expectations and feedback context on feedback inquiry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 42-64.
36.
Redding, S. G.
, & Ng, M. (1982). The role of face in the organizational perceptions of Chinese managers. Organization Studies, 3(3), 210-219.
37.
Reichardt, C. S.
, & Cook, T. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In C. Rhinehardt & T. Cook (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation (pp. 7-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
Schor, S. M.
, & Sabiers, M. (1995). T-groups in the classroom: Some examples of current practice. Journal of Management Education, 19(4), 523-539.
39.
Selmer, J.
(1997). Vikings and dragons: Swedish management in Southeast Asia. Hong Kong: David C. Lam Institute for East-West Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University.
40.
Smith, D. G.
(1977).College classroom interactions and critical thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 180-190.
41.
Spradley, J. P.
(1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, & Winston.
42.
Stevenson, H. W.
, & Lee, S. Y. (1996). The academic achievement of Chinese students. In M. H. Bond (Ed.) The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
43.
Ting-Toomey, S.
(Ed.). (1994). The challenge of facework: Cross-cultural and interpersonal issues. Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
Triandis, H. C.
(1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45.
Trompenaars, F.
(1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. London: The Economist Books.
46.
Yang, K. S.
(1993). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In L. Y. Cheng, F.M.C. Cheung, & C. N. Chen (Eds.), Psychotherapy for the Chinese: Selected papers from the first international conference (pp. 19-56). Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
47.
Yeo, S.
(1995, July 9). The lengths some parents will go to... The Sunday Times, Sunday Plus.
