This article reports on the rationale, design, implementation, and outcomes of new competency-based courses at a U.K. university. Follow-up research among students and staff members indicates that students taking the competency-based courses appear to be much more skilled than their predecessors in the academic and vocational areas taught on the courses, are receiving higher grades, and are having good success in being selected for jobs. The article also provides a model for design and delivery based on experiential and metacognitive theory and on research asking students for their reactions to this new way of learning and their preferences for competency-based course design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boam, R.
, & Sparrow, P. (1992). Designing and achieving competency. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Boud, D.
, Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. New York: Kogan Page/Nichols Publishing Company.
3.
Bowden, J.
, & Masters, G. (1993). Implications for higher education of a competency-based approach to education and training. Canberra, Australia: AGPS.
4.
Boyatzis, R.
(1982). The competent manager—A model for effective performance. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Brown, A. L.
(1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Dahlin, B.
(1999). Ways of coming to understand: Metacognitive awareness among first-year university students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 43, 191-208.
7.
Duley, J. S.
(1981). Field experience education. In A. W. Chickering (Ed.), The modern American college. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Hager, P.
, Athanassou, J., & Gonczi, A. (1994). Assessment—Technical manual. Canberra, Australia: AGPS.
9.
Ho, B.
(1997). Reactions of students to reflective learning in a technical report-writing course. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 211-227.
10.
Hoffmann, T.
(1999). The meanings of competency. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), 275-285.
11.
Katz, N.
, & Hartman-Maeir, A. (1997). Occupational performance and metacognition. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(2), 53-62.
12.
Kolb, D. A.
(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Metcalfe, J.
, & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.). (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Mezirow, J.
(1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32, 3-24.
15.
Rogers, C. R.
(1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
16.
Rutherford, P.
(1995). Competency based assessment. Melbourne, Australia: Pitman.
17.
Spicer, D. P.
, & Sadler-Smith, E. (1998, June). Cognitive style and levels of learning. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual ELSIN Conference, Sunderland, UK.
18.
Sternberg, R. J.
(1998). Metacognition, abilities and developing expertise: What makes an expert student?Instructional Science, 26, 127-140.
19.
Sternberg, R. J.
, & Kolligian, J., Jr. (1990). Competence considered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
