Spinal cord injury is common in the working age population in Bangladesh, and work participation following injury is complex due to its physical, psychological, social and economic impacts on the lives of injured persons, their families and communities. Few evidence-based resources are available to occupational therapists in Bangladesh to guide their practice in supporting work re-engagement of this population.
Objective
To explore the Occupational Therapists’ experiences about the usefulness of the Worker Role Interview in spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Bangladesh.
Method
Occupational therapists at a rehabilitation centre received training to use the Worker Role Interview. Four therapists in the spinal unit were then recruited, and participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
Four themes were identified: supports patients’ agency to express themselves and work possibilities; initiates self-inquiry about the prospects of working; facilitates understanding of patients beyond their injury; and contextualising the interview for local practice.
Conclusion
The Worker Role Interview provides a useful way for occupational therapists in Bangladesh to understand how people view their work after spinal cord injury, which may promote the design of client-centred and meaningful interventions.
AasR. W.ThingbC.HolteK. A.LieK.LodeI. A. (2011). On long term sick leave due to musculoskeletal diseases and disorders. Experiences of work demands. Work, 39(3), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2011-1171
2.
AnalytisP.BarclayL.FosseyE.DowningM.PonsfordJ. L.RossP. (2025). Patients’ perspectives of receiving an early vocational rehabilitation following major traumatic injury. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(23), 6146–6154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2476036
3.
ArebergC.BejerholmU. (2013). The effect of IPS on participants’ engagement, quality of life, empowerment, and motivation: A randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(6), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2013.765911
4.
AsmundsdottirE. E. (2004). The worker role interview: A powerful tool in Icelandic work rehabilitation. Work, 22(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2004-00334
5.
BloomJ.DorsettP.McLennanV. (2020). Vocational rehabilitation to empower consumers following newly acquired spinal cord injury. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 53(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-201091
6.
BravemanB. (1999). The model of human occupation and prediction of return to work: A review of related empirical research. Work, 12(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-1999-00003
BurnsS. M.BoydB. L.HillJ.HoughS. (2010). Psychosocial predictors of employment status among men living with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 55(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018583
ChevalierZ.KennedyP.SherlockO. (2009). Spinal cord injury, coping and psychological adjustment: A literature review. Spinal Cord, 47(11), 778–782. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.60
11.
EganB. E.RayC.MimsA.EganT.HowardE.EganM. (2015). The worker role interview: A tool for documenting psychosocial factors that influence return to work. Mental Health Special Interest Section Quarterly, 38(3), 1–4.
12.
EkbladhE.SandqvistJ. (2015). Psychosocial Factors’ influence on work ability of people experiencing sick leave resulting from common mental disorders. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 31(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2015.1055530
13.
Enemark LarsenA.Jessen WingeC.ChristensenJ. R. (2021). Clinical utility of the danish version of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(3), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2019.1634150
14.
FengerK.KramerJ. M. (2007). Worker role interview: Testing the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version. Scandavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120601040743
15.
FisherG. S. (1999). Administration and application of the worker role interview: Looking beyond functional capacity. Work, 12(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-1999-00004
16.
ForsythK.BravemanB.KielhofnerG.EkbladhE.HaglundL.FengerK.KellerJ. (2006). Psychometric properties of the worker role interview. Work, 27(3), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2006-00574
17.
HiltonG.UnsworthC.MurphyG. (2018). The experience of attempting to return to work following spinal cord injury: A systematic review of the qualitative literature. Disability & Rehabilitation, 40(15), 1745–1753. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1312566
18.
HoqueM. F.HasanZ.RazzakA. T. M. A.HelalS. U. (2012). Cervical spinal cord injury due to fall while carrying heavy load on head: A problem in Bangladesh. Spinal Cord, 50(4), 275–277. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.153
19.
HossainM. S.HarveyL. A.IslamM. S.RahmanM. A.LiuH.HerbertR. D.on behalf of theC. T. C. (2020). Loss of work-related income impoverishes people with SCI and their families in Bangladesh. Spinal Cord, 58(4), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0382-1
20.
IslamM. S.HafezM. A.AkterM. (2011). Characterization of spinal cord lesion in patients attending a specialized rehabilitation center in Bangladesh. Spinal Cord, 49(7), 783–786. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.36
21.
JeyathevanG.Catharine CravenB.CameronJ. I.JaglalS. B. (2020). Facilitators and barriers to supporting individuals with spinal cord injury in the community: Experiences of family caregivers and care recipients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(13), 1844–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1541102
22.
JulianC. H.ValenteJ. M. (2015). Psychosocial factors related to returning to work in U. S. Army Soldiers. Work, 52(2), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-152113
23.
KaderM.PereraN. K. P.Sohrab HossainM.IslamR. (2018). Socio-demographic and injury-related factors contributing to activity limitations and participation restrictions in people with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh. Spinal Cord, 56(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-017-0001-y
24.
KentM. L.DorstynD. S. (2014). Psychological variables associated with employment following spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis. Spinal Cord, 52(10), 722–728. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2014.92
25.
KhazaeipourZ.Norouzi-JavidanA.KavehM.MehrabaniF. K.KazaziE.Emami-RazaviS.-H. (2014). Psychosocial outcomes following spinal cord injury in Iran. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 37(3), 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000174
26.
KielhofnerG.BravemanB.BaronK.FisherG.HammelJ.LittletonM. (1999). The model of human occupation: Understanding the worker who is injured or disabled. Work, 12(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-1999-00002
27.
KollerB.NiedermannK.KlipsteinA.HaugboelleJ. (2011). The psychometric properties of the German version of the new worker role interview (WRI-G 10.0) in people with musculoskeletal disorders. Work, 40(4), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-2011-1252
28.
LeeJ.KielhofnerG. (2010). Vocational intervention based on the model of human occupation: A review of evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120903082260
29.
LexellE. M.LangdellI.LexellJ. (2017). Vocational situation and experiences from the work environment among individuals with neuromuscular diseases. Work, 56(4), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-172527
30.
LiamputtongP. (2013). Making sense of qualitative data: The analysis process. In Qualitative research methods (4th ed., pp. 252). Oxford University Press.
31.
MollerC.-L.LingahT.PhehlukwayoS. M. (2017). “We all need employment” - an exploration of the factors which influence the return to work after a severe traumatic brain injury. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(3), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.17159/2310-3833/2017/v47n3a4
32.
ParkJ.GrossD. P.RayaniF.NorrisC. M.RobertsM. R.JamesC.GuptillC.EsmailS. (2019). Model of human occupation as a framework for implementation of motivational interviewing in occupational rehabilitation. Work, 62(4), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-192895
33.
PostM. W.van LeeuwenC. M. (2012). Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: A review. Spinal Cord, 50(5), 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2011.182
34.
RahmanM. H.NasreenM. (2025). Vocational rehabilitation services for persons with disabilities in Bangladesh: Identifying service gaps and scopes for improvement. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 63(2), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/10522263251356228
35.
RamakrishnanK.JohnstonD.GarthB.MurphyG.MiddletonJ.CameronI. (2016). Early access to vocational rehabilitation for inpatients with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study of Patients’ perceptions. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 22(3), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2203-183
36.
ShamrockH. J.GrayM.CameronM.OprescuF. (2016). Physical disabilities in Asia: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature written in English. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(9), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616640802
37.
StrømstadK.SkarpaasL. S.HaslerudS. I.AlveY. A.SandqvistJ.AasR. W. (2024). Exploring return to work barriers through the lens of model of human occupation. The NOW WHAT project. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31(1), 2297732. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2297732
38.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
39.
ToomeyM.NicholsonD.CarswellA. (1995). The clinical utility of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Can J Occup Ther, 62(5), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749506200503
40.
UddinT.IslamM. T.HossainM.HossainM. S.SalekA. K. M.IslamM. J.HaqueS.RahimH. R.HossainM. S.HassanuzzamanM.IslamM.KhanM. U. H.AhmedS.MahmudK.HasanM. R.TasnimA.HaqueM. A. (2023). Demographic and clinical characteristics of persons with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: Database for the international spinal cord injury community survey 2023. Neurotrauma Rep, 4(1), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0040
41.
UddinT.SiddiqueeN.RahmanM. A.HelalS. U.KiekensC. (2022). Rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury in Bangladesh. Mymensingh Medical Journal, 31(4), 1093–1101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36189557/
42.
UllahM. M.FosseyE.StuckeyR. (2025). Meaning of work participation after spinal cord injury in Bangladesh: A qualitative study in a low- and middle-income country context. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 35 (4), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10244-5
43.
UllahM. M.SarkerA.ChowdhuryS. K. (2015). Assessment for returning to work after spinal cord injuries and patient’s vocational preferences. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 50(3), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-151995
44.
YngveM.EkbladhE. (2015). Clinical utility of the worker role interview: A survey study among Swedish users. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 22(6), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2015.1007161
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
