The emergence and accessibility of generative artificial intelligence (AI), such as ChatGPT, has facilitated opportunities for use of AI among vocational rehabilitation (VR) counselors and employment specialists for support in job development and recommendations for people with disabilities.
Objective
This study examined potential biases of ChatGPT in its responses to prompts requesting specific job recommendations for case vignettes based on specific disability types.
Method
ChatGPT 4o mini was probed for job placement recommendations for seven disability types and a no disability control across vignette conditions that varied by gender and level of case detail.
Results
Several significant differences between disability and vignette condition regarding average income level and categorization of jobs emerged. Notably, individuals with intellectual disabilities and those with serious mental illness were suggested occupations with lower salaries. Vignettes with intellectual disability showed a higher proportion of restricted job types compared to every other disability type explored in this study. Further, salaries were lowest when individual interests were omitted from the profile, while high salaries were observed when little to no information was included in the vignette. Alternatively, low salaries were observed for individuals with intellectual disabilities across all conditions.
Conclusion
Overall, these findings suggest the need for careful and thoughtful use of AI tools among VR counselors and employment support providers.
AliM.SchurL.BlanckP. (2011). What types of jobs do people with disabilities want?Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9266-0
2.
BogartK. R.RosaN. M.SlepianM. L. (2018). Born that way or became that way: Stigma toward congenital versus acquired disability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(4), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218757897
3.
BonaccioS.ConnellyC. E.GellatlyI. R.JethaA.Martin GinisK. A. (2020). The participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle: Employer concerns and research evidence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5
4.
BurkeJ.BezyakJ.FraserR. T.PeteJ.DitchmanN.ChanF. (2013). Employers’ attitudes towards hiring and retaining people with disabilities: A review of the literature. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 19(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrc.2013.2
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Prevalence of disability by occupation group — United States, 2016–2020. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 72(25), 689–692. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7220a1
6.
ChenZ. (2023). Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: Removing human prejudices in employment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-00716-0
7.
ColorafiK.CupplesL.KallmanD.KennedyJ. (2021). Disability stories: Personal perspectives of people with disabilities on navigating the U.S. health system. Disability & Society, 38(9), 1585–1607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.2004879
8.
DalginR.BelliniJ. (2008). Invisible disability disclosure in an employment interview: Impact on employers’ hiring decisions and views of employability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 52(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355207311311
9.
DaneshjouR.SmithM. P.SunM. D.RotembergV.ZouJ. (2021). Lack of transparency and potential bias in artificial intelligence data sets and algorithms: A scoping review. JAMA Dermatology, 157(11), 1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3129
10.
El MorrC.KundiB.MobeenF.TaleghaniS.El-LahibY.GormanR. (2024). AI and disability: A systematic scoping review. Health Informatics Journal, 30(3), 14604582241285743. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241285743
11.
EricksonW.LeeC.von SchraderS. (2025). Disability statistics from the American Community Survey (ACS).NY: Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI). Retrieved from Cornell University Disability Statistics website: www.disabilitystatistics.org
12.
GalderisiS.HeinzA.KastrupM.BeezholdJ.SartoriusN. (2015). Toward a new definition of mental health. World Psychiatry, 14(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20231
Guzman, G., & Kollar, M. ((2024, September). U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, P60-282, Income in the United States: 2023. U.S. Government Publishing Office.
15.
JajtnerK. M.MitraS.FountainC.NicholsA. (2020). Rising income inequality through a disability lens: Trends in the United States 1981-2018. Social Indicators Research, 151(1), 81–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02379-8
16.
KaplanD. M.PalitskyR.Arconada AlvarezS. J.PozzoN. S.GreenleafM. N.AtkinsonC. A.LamW. A. (2024). What's in a name? Experimental evidence of gender bias in recommendation letters generated by ChatGPT. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e51837. https://doi.org/10.2196/51837
17.
KarakaşÜÖzdemirV. (2025). Artificial intelligence and environmental impact: Moving beyond humanizing vocabulary and anthropocentrism. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 29(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2024.0197
18.
KayeH. S.JansL. H.JonesE. C. (2011). Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities?Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21, 526–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9302-8
19.
KinnL. G.CostaM.VollI.AustrheimG.AasR. W.DavidsonL. (2021). Navigating between unpredictable icebergs”: A meta-ethnographic study of employment specialists’ contributions in providing job support for people with mental illness. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 31(3), 512–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09943-6
20.
LeeE. E.TorousJ.De ChoudhuryM.DeppC. A.GrahamS. A.KimH. C.PaulusM. P.KrystalJ. H.JesteD. V. (2021). Artificial intelligence for mental health care: Clinical applications, barriers, facilitators, and artificial wisdom. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 6(9), 856–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.02.001
21.
McDanielsB. (2016). Disproportionate opportunities: Fostering vocational choice for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160807
22.
McDonaldH. R.DerryM.BavusoE. (2025). Embracing the future: Artificial intelligence in the provision of pre-employment transition services to autistic and neurodivergent youth. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 62(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/10522263241312734
23.
McDonnallM. C.CmarJ. L.McKnightZ. S. (2022). Beyond employment rates: Earnings of people with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 116(4), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482 ( 221121830
24.
MorwaneR. E.DadaS.BornmanJ. (2021). Barriers to and facilitators of employment of persons with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review. African Journal of Disability, 10, 833. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v10i0.833
NagtegaalR.de BoerN.van BerkelR.DerksB.TummersL. (2023). Why do employers (fail to) hire people with disabilities? A systematic review of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 33(2), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10076-1
27.
National Center on Advancing Person-Centered Practices and Systems (NCAPPS). (2021, May 10). Wisconsin Employment First Conference: Final presentation [PowerPoint slides].
Newman-GriffisD.RauchbergJ. S.AlharbiR.HickmanL.HochheiserH. (2023). Definition drives design: Disability models and mechanisms of bias in AI technologies. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v28i1.12903
PackinN. G. (2021). Disability discrimination using artificial intelligence systems and social scoring: Can we disable digital bias?Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8(2), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3724556
32.
ParkY.HuJ. (2023). Bias in artificial intelligence: Basic primer. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 18(3), 394–396. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000000000000078
33.
ReardonK.UnruhD. K.RoweD. A. (2025). Employer perspectives toward hiring and retaining individuals with disabilities: A national survey of entry-level employers. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 62(3), 310–324.https://doi.org/10.1177/10522263251326524
34.
Sánchez-MonederoJ.DencikL.EdwardsL. (2020). What does it mean to ‘solve’ the problem of discrimination in hiring? In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372849
35.
ShogrenK.A.DeanE.E.LinnenkampB.RaleyS.K.MartinisJ.BlanckP. (2021). Supported decision-making. In KhemkaI.HicksonL. (Eds.), Decision making by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Positive psychology and disability series (pp. 21–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74675-9_2.
SundarV.O’NeillJ.HoutenvilleA. J.PhillipsK. G.KeirnsT.SmithA.KatzE. E. (2018). Striving to work and overcoming barriers: Employment strategies and successes of people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-170918
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024a, April 3). May 2023 state occupational employment and wage estimates – Illinois. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/oes/2023/may/oes_il.htm
42.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2022, March 30). Persons with a disability: Barriers to employment, types of assistance, and other labor-related issues — July 2021 (USDL-22-0555). U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/dissup_03302022.htm
U.S. Department of Education, National Clearinghouse for Rehabilitation Training Materials. (2026). For VR counselors [Web page]. https://ncrtm.ed.gov/vr-journey
46.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Rehabilitation Services Administration. (2024, October 18). Dear colleague letter (DCL-25-01): Artificial intelligence and its role in vocational rehabilitation services [Dear colleague letter]. https://rsa.ed.gov/sites/default/files/subregulatory/DCL-25-01-Final_0.pdf
47.
VestlingM.TufvessonB.IwarssonS. (2003). Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(3), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970310010475
48.
WernerS. (2015). Public stigma and the perception of rights: Differences between intellectual and physical disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.030
WunderlichG. S.RiceD. P.AmadoN. L. (Eds.). (2002). The dynamics of disability: Measuring and monitoring disability for Social Security programs. National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220734/
