Agriculture remains one of the most high-risk sectors characterized by persistent gender disparities in accident profiles and recovery outcomes. Deciphering these divergences is crucial for designing targeted preventive and rehabilitative interventions.
Objective
This study examines gender-based differences in occupational accident severity within the Spanish agricultural sector, utilizing medical leave duration as a proxy to identify key personal, organizational, and material determinants.
Methods
Using official national labor records (2019–2023), the study analyzed 122,220 accidents. Severity was operationalized through lost workdays. Student's t-tests evaluated gender-based disparities across personal and material variables.
Results
While men exhibited higher accident frequency and overall severity, women reported significantly longer recovery periods in specific contexts. In micro-enterprises (1–5 employees), women's leave averaged 9.1 days longer than men's. While younger females record shorter recovery durations than their male counterparts, this differential reverses after age 45; specifically, the 45–54 cohort, females’ absences exceed those of males by 3.76 days. Although women exhibit faster recovery across the most prevalent accident categories, they experience significantly protracted medical leave for bone fractures, exceeding the male average by 17.99 days. Finally, while migrant workers recorded shorter absences, these gender disparities remained consistent regardless of nationality.
Conclusions
Results underscore the need for gender-sensitive prevention strategies addressing the ergonomic demands of female workers. Prioritizing micro-enterprises and aging populations in safety protocols is vital for mitigating disparities and reducing absences. While this study uses Spanish data, findings offer broader implications for agricultural contexts with similar labor and organizational structures.
BarazaXCugueró-EscofetN. Severity of occupational agricultural accidents in Spain, 2013–2018. Saf Sci2021; 143: 105422.
2.
Stergiou-KitaMLafranceMPritloveC, et al.Examining theoretical approaches to men and masculinity in the context of high-risk work: applications, benefits and challenges. Saf Sci2017; 96: 150–160.
3.
JarénCIbarrolaAMangadoT, et al.Fatal tractor accidents in the agricultural sector in Spain during the past decade. Agronomy2022; 12: 1694.
4.
RezaeiRSeidiMKarnasiounM. Pesticide exposure reduction: extending the theory of planned behavior to understand Iranian farmers’ intention to apply personal protective equipment. Saf Sci2019; 120: 527–537.
5.
HolteKAFolloG. Making occupational health and safety training relevant for farmers: evaluation of an introductory course in occupational health and safety in Norway. Saf Sci2018; 109: 368–376.
6.
FontanedaICamino-LópezMAGonzález-AlcántaraOJ, et al.Gender differences in lost work days due to occupational accidents. Saf Sci2019; 114: 23–29.
7.
Garcia-HerreroSMGarcíaJMARitzelDO. Influence of task demands on occupational stress: gender differences. J Saf Res2012; 43: 365–374.
8.
MomoseYSuenagaT. Gender differences in the occurrence of nonfatal agricultural injuries among farmers in Fukuoka, Japan. J Rural Med2015; 10: 57–64.
9.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Nota de prensa Encuesta sobre la estructura de las explotaciones agrícolas 2023, https://www.ine.es/dyngs/Prensa/EEEA2023.htm (2025, accessed 24 February 2026).
MargolisKA. Underground coal mining injury: a look at how age and experience relate to days lost from work following an injury. Saf Sci2010; 48: 417–421.
13.
MataAGonzálezA. Los empresarios agrícolas y la contratación de temporeros: el caso de la Plana de Lleida. Rev Intern Organ2017; 19: 143–162, https://repositori.udl.cat/handle/10459.1/65178.
14.
AnderssonELundqvistP. Gendered agricultural space and safety: towards embodied, situated knowledge. J Agromedicine2014; 19: 303–315.
15.
Bel-LatourLGraniéMA. The influence of the perceived masculinity of an occupation on risk behavior: the case of firefighters. Saf Sci2022; 150: 105702.
Else-QuestNMHydeJS. The psychology of women and gender: half the human experience. New York: Sage Publications Inc, 2017.
18.
MessingKLefrançoisMSaint-CharlesJ. Observing inequality: can ergonomic observations help interventions transform the role of gender in work activity?Comput Support Coop Work2021; 30: 215–249.
19.
CaffaroFRoccatoMMichelettiM, et al.Falls from agricultural machinery: risk factors related to work experience, worked hours, and operators’ behavior. Hum Factors2018; 60: 20–30.
20.
KarttunenJPRautiainenRH. 362 Gender differences in work tasks and injuries in agriculture. Inj Prev2016; 22: A1–A397.
21.
BandeRLópez-MoureloE. The impact of worker’s age on the consequences of occupational accidents: empirical evidence using Spanish data. J Labor Res2015; 36: 129–174.
22.
BarazaXCugueró-EscofetNRodríguez-ElizaldeR. Statistical analysis of the severity of occupational accidents in the mining sector. J Saf Res2023; 86: 364–375.
23.
BryantL. Gendered bodies, gendered knowledges: information technology in everyday farming. Soc Sci Comput Rev2003; 21: 464–474.
24.
BarazaXCugueró-EscofetN. Immigration and occupational accidents: a comparative study of accident severity among foreign and Spanish citizens in the agricultural sector. Span J Agric Res2022; 20: e0105.
25.
Martín-RománALMoralAPinillos-FrancoS. Are women breaking the glass ceiling? A gendered analysis of the duration of sick leave in Spain. Int J Health Econ Manag2024; 24: 107–134.
26.
PfeiferC. Impact of wages and job levels on worker absenteeism. Int J Manpow2010; 31: 59–72.
27.
OscaALópez-AraújoB. Work stress, personality and occupational accidents: should we expect differences between men and women?Saf Sci2020; 124: 104582.
28.
Ley de la Seguridad Social. Real Decreto Legislativo 8/2015, de 30 de octubre, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley General de la Seguridad Social. (2015, accessed 5 December 2024).
29.
AranaIMangadoJArnalP, et al.Evaluation of risk factors in fatal accidents in agriculture. Span J Agric Res2010; 8: 592–598.
BlanchATorrellesBAlujaA, et al.Age and lost working days as a result of an occupational accident: a study in a shiftwork rotation system. Saf Sci2009; 47: 1359–1363.
34.
BravoGCastellucciHILavallièreM, et al.The influence of age on fatal work accidents and lost days in Chile between 2015 and 2019. Saf Sci2022; 147: 105599.
35.
SalviaL. The restructuring of Italian agriculture and its impact upon capital labour relations: labour contracting and exploitation in the fresh fruit and vegetable supply chain of the Lazio Region, Central Italy. J Agrar Change2020; 20: 98–112.
36.
Briones-VozmedianoEGonzález-GonzálezA. Explotación y precariedad sociolaboral, la realidad de las personas migrantes trabajadoras en agricultura en España. Archiv Prev Riesgos Lab2022; 25: 18–24.
37.
CummingsSREastellR. Stop (mis) classifying fractures as high-or low-trauma or as fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int2020; 31: 1023–1024.
38.
ZambonIPiergentiliASalvatiL, et al.Applied research for a safer future: exploring recent job accidents in agriculture, Italy (2012-2017). Processes2018; 6: 87.
39.
MariscalMALópez-PereaEMLópez-GarcíaJR, et al.The influence of employee training and information on the probability of accident rates. Int J Ind Ergon2019; 72: 311–319.
40.
ComanMAMarcuACherechesRM, et al.Educational interventions to improve safety and health literacy among agricultural workers: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 1114.
41.
ShortallSMcKeeASutherlandLA. Why do farm accidents persist? Normalising danger on the farm within the farm family. Sociol Health Illn2019; 41: 470–483.
McLaughlinACSpruferaJF. Aging farmers are at high risk for injuries and fatalities: how human-factors research and application can help. N C Med J2011; 72: 481–483.
