Background: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are among the leading occupational diseases, often resulting in prolonged work absences and complicating the return-to-work process. These absences can result in social, economic, and psychological consequences, making reintegration into work more challenging. Factors such as age, education, motivation, and workplace environment also influence the return process.
Objective: To identify, through a systematic review, the main challenges influencing the return and retention in work for employees on leave due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the updated PRISMA. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese between 2012 and 2022 were included in the following databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Scopus. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted CASP tool to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies.
Results: A total of 671 records were identified, and after screening and eligibility assessment, 11 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. The main challenges identified included: emotional aspects, functional capacity, sociodemographic factors (age, education, economic factors), health system access, worker protection policies, workplace organization, and work relationships.
Conclusions: The study highlights the complexity of returning to work and its impact on workers, emphasizing the need for improved public health policies and worker protection measures. Other: Registered with PROSPERO, ID: CRD42022325805.
ToldráRCDaldonMTBSantosMC, et al.Facilitators and barriers to returning to work: the experience of workers treated at a reference center for occupational health, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Saude Ocup [Internet]2010 Jun [cited 2022 Nov]; 35: 10–22. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbso/a/8K6FM6rGjcXRzG9JYDjZvnx/.
LancmanSJardimTA. The impact of work organization on mental health: a study in work psychodynamics. Rev Ter Ocup Univ São Paulo [Internet]2004 Aug [cited 2022 Nov]; 15: 82–89. Available from: http://www.revistas.usp.br/rto/article/view/13943.
ScopelMJ.Return to work: trajectory of metalworkers with RSI/WMSD [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2023 Feb]. Available from: https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/7233
7.
FeijóCDA. Views on the cessation of disability retirement: perspectives of the actors involved in the return-to-work process. Master's thesis [internet]. São Paulo: University of São Paulo, Brasil, 2022 [cited 2023 Mar]. Available from: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/6/6143/tde-28062022-150128
8.
AlbanesiBPireddaMBraviM, et al.Interventions to prevent and reduce work-related musculoskeletal injuries and pain among healthcare professionals: a comprehensive systematic review of the literature. J Safety Res2022 Sep; 82: 124–143.
9.
Antwi-AfariMFLiHChanAHS, , et al.A science mapping-based review of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers. J Safety Res [Internet]. 2023 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Jun]; 85: 114–128. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437523000117 doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.011
10.
BültmannUShersonDOlsenJ, , et al.Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil [Internet]. 2009 Mar [cited 2023 Jul]; 19: 81–93. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10926-009-9162-7 doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9162-7
YangLBranscumABovbjergV, et al.Assessing disabling and non-disabling injuries and illnesses using accepted workers’ compensation claims data to prioritize industries of high risk for Oregon young workers. J Safety Res2021 Jun; 77: 241–254.
VolkmerCMonticelliMReibnitzKS, et al.Female urinary incontinence: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Cienc Saude Coletiva [Internet]. 2012 Oct [cited 2023 Mar]; 17: 2703–2715. Available from:10.1590/S1413-81232012001000019
17.
Van BeurdenKMVermeulenSJAnemaJR, et al.A participatory return-to-work program for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: a process evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil [Internet]. 2012 Mar [cited 2023 Jul]; 22: 127–140. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10926-011-9314-4 doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9314-4
18.
HamnesBRønningenASkarbøÅ.Experiences of participating in return-to-work group programmes for people with musculoskeletal disorders: a focus group study. Musculoskeletal Care [Internet]. 2017 Sep [cited 2023 Jul]; 15: 272–280. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/msc.1210 doi:10.1002/msc.1210
19.
NäsiEPerkiöMKokkinenL.The complexity of decreased work ability: individuals’ perceptions of factors that affect returning to work after sickness absence. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2021 Dec 23 [cited 2023 Jul]; 19: 113. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/113 doi:10.3390/ijerph19010113
20.
NastasiaICoutuMFRivesR, et al.Role and responsibilities of supervisors in the sustainable return to work of workers following a work-related musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil [Internet]. 2021 Mar [cited 2023 Jul]; 31: 107–118. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10926-020-09896-w doi:10.1007/s10926-020-09896-w
21.
RashidMKristofferzonMLNilssonA. Predictors of return to work among women with long-term neck/shoulder and/or back pain: a 1-year prospective study. PLoS One [Internet]2021 Nov 23 [cited 2023 Jul]; 16: e0260490. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260490
SvanholmFLiedbergGMLöfgrenM, et al.Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain who have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program: a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil [Internet]. 2020 Nov 23 [cited 2023 Jul]; 44: 736–744. Available from:10.1080/09638288.2020.1780479
YoungAEChoiYBesenE. An exploration of the factors considered when forming expectations for returning to work following sickness absence due to a musculoskeletal condition. PLoS One [Internet]2015 Nov 18 [cited 2023 Jul]; 10: e0143330. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143330.
26.
YoungAEChoiY. Work-related factors considered by sickness-absent employees when estimating timeframes for returning to work. PLoS One [Internet]2016 Oct 5 [cited 2023 Jul]; 11: e0163674. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163674.
27.
SouzaMELDFaimanCJS.Work, health and identity: repercussions of returning to work after absence due to illness or accident on professional identity. Saúde Ética Justiça [Internet]. 2007 Nov 7 [cited 2023 Aug];12:22. Available from: http://www.revistas.usp.br/sej/article/view/44356
28.
NegriJRCervenyGCDOMontebeloMIDL, et al.Sociodemographic and occupational profile of workers with RSI/WMSD: an epidemiological study. Rev Baiana Saude Publica [Internet]2014 Sep 1 [cited 2023 Aug]; 38: 555–570. Available from: http://inseer.ibict.br/rbsp/index.php/rbsp/article/viewFile/608/pdf_575
29.
LancmanSSimonelliAPRodriguesDS. Return to work and permanence processes: structuring elements for the construction of an action model. In: SimonelliAPRodriguesDS (eds) Health and work under debate: old questions, new perspectives. Brasília: Paralelo, 2013, pp.135–158.
BatistaWFG. Exploring the relationship between cultural values, social axioms and attitudes towards older workers. [PhD thesis]. São Paulo: Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, 2020.
32.
LecoursALalibertéMLordMM, et al.The process of rehabilitation, return and stay at work of aging workers who suffered an occupational injury: a portrait based on the experience of Canadian stakeholders. J Occup Rehabil [Internet]2022 Dec [cited 2023 Sep]; 32: 790–802. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10926-022-10045-8 doi:10.1007/s10926-022-10045-8
33.
GaedkeMÂKrugSBF. Quem eu sou? A identidade de trabalhadoras portadoras de LER/DORT (Who am I? The identity of female workers with RSI/WMSD). M A2008; 7: 120–137.
34.
OakmanJCluneSStuckeyR. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Australia: the latest research on work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Canberra: Safe Work Australia, 2019.
35.
KampTBrouwerSHylkemaTH, et al.Psychosocial working conditions play an important role in the return-to-work process after total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Occup Rehabil [Internet]. 2022 Jun [cited 2023 Sep]; 32: 295–305. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10926-021-10006-7 doi:10.1007/s10926-021-10006-7.
36.
BarbieriDFNogueiraHCBergaminLJ, et al.Physical and psychosocial indicators among office workers from public sector with and without musculoskeletal symptoms. Work [Internet]2012 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Sep]; 41: 2461–2466. Available from: https://content.iospress.com/articles/work/wor0481.
37.
LancmanSBarrosJOSilvaMD, et al.Interrelationship between organizational and relational aspects and the return-to-work process: a case study with nursing professionals at a teaching hospital in Brazil. J Occup Rehabil2017 Mar; 27: 49–58.
38.
LancmanSBarrosoBIL. Mental health: professional rehabilitation and the return to work – a systematic review. Work2021; 69: 439–448.
