Background: Basic Military Training (BMT) in the Canadian Armed Forces includes high physical demands. Given low levels of fitness in the Canadian population, the Basic Training Fitness Test (BTFT) was introduced to assess early readiness, and a Pre Basic Military Training (Pre-BMT) program was developed to support preparation.
Objective: This study aimed to identify predictors of BTFT success and examine the influence of Pre BMT engagement.
Methods: From January to November 2024, 3933 candidates (687 female) completed assessments during week one of BMT including the BTFT, body composition analysis, and a Pre-BMT engagement survey. Logistic regression with elastic net regularization models predicted BTFT success for the full cohort and by sex.
Results: Overall BTFT success was 91.8%, with males outperforming females (96.2% vs. 70.9%). The full cohort model (AUC = 0.87) retained sex, body fat percentage, skeletal muscle mass, age, height, candidate type, recruitment duration, and Pre-BMT engagement. Lower body fat, greater muscle mass, younger age, and officer cadet status were associated with higher odds of success; female sex predicted lower odds. The male model (AUC = 0.82) also retained height, while the female model (AUC = 0.78) included previous pregnancy, but excluded candidate type and Pre-BMT engagement. Engagement level was not a significant predictor in any model.
Conclusions: Body composition emerged as the strongest determinant of BTFT success, underscoring the value of targeted pre-conditioning to increase muscle mass and reduce adiposity. Tailored training strategies that account for sex may enhance readiness. Given low Pre-BMT participation, its potential role in candidate preparation warrants further study.
RossRChaputJPGiangregorioLM, et al.Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for adults aged 18–64 years and adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2020; 45: S57–S102.
2.
RolloSLangJJRobertsKC, et al.Health associations with meeting the Canadian 24-h movement guidelines for adults: results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep2022; 33: 16–26.
3.
Yáñez SepúlvedaRTuestaMCortés RocoG, et al.Body composition classification with electrical bioimpedance in Chilean military by sex. Int J Morphol2024; 42: 1053–1061.
4.
SchramBOrrRNiederbergerB, et al.Cardiovascular demand differences between male and female US marine recruits during progressive loaded hikes. J Strength Cond Res2024; 38: e454–e458.
5.
RichmondVLCarterJMWilkinsonDM, et al.Comparison of the physical demands of single-sex training for male and female recruits in the British army. Mil Med2012; 177: 709–715.
6.
BlackerSDWilkinsonDMRaysonMP. Gender differences in the physical demands of British army recruit training. Mil Med2009; 174: 811–816.
7.
WoodPSGrantCCdu ToitPJ, et al.Effect of mixed basic military training on the physical fitness of male and female soldiers. Mil Med2017; 182: e1771–9.
8.
LarocheMAChasséÉThéoretD, et al.Assessment of training load, sleep, injuries, and operational physical performance during basic military qualification. Mil Med2023; 188: e2018–e2025.
9.
ChasséELarocheMADufourCA, et al.Association between musculoskeletal injuries and the Canadian armed forces physical employment standard proxy in Canadian military recruits. Mil Med2020; 185: e1140–6.
10.
PrinceSAMelvinARobertsKC, et al.Sedentary behaviour surveillance in Canada: trends, challenges and lessons learned. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2020; 17: 34.
RobinsonMSiddallABilzonJ, et al.Low fitness, low body mass and prior injury predict injury risk during military recruit training: a prospective cohort study in the British Army. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med2016; 2: e000100.
16.
SeftonJMLohseKRMcAdamJS. Prediction of injuries and injury types in army basic training, infantry, armor, and cavalry trainees using a common fitness screen. J Athl Train2016; 51: 849–857.
FoulisSAProctorSPSpieringBA, et al.Model for musculoskeletal injury risk factors among US army basic combat trainees. JAMA Netw Open2025; 8: e2513177–e2513177.
20.
Jasp Team. 2024.
21.
ChasséETingelstadHCNeedham-BeckSC, et al.Factors affecting performance on an army urban operation casualty evacuation for male and female soldiers. Mil Med2019; 184: e856–e862.
22.
RobitailleEReillyTHeipelS, et al.The value of strength as a predictor of musculoskeletal injury in Canadian armed forces basic infantry candidates. Mil Med2024; 189: e1675–e1682.
23.
VikmoenOTeienHKRaustølM, et al.Sex differences in the physiological response to a demanding military field exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports2020; 30: 1348–1359.
24.
ReillyTDrainJSharpM, et al.HFM: Combat Integration, Implications for Physical Employment Standards. 2019. Report No.: NATO STO-TR-HFM-269.
25.
KnapikJJHauretKGMarinR, et al.Association between ambulatory physical activity and injuries during United States army basic combat training. J Phys Act Health2011; 8: 496–502.
26.
BulmerSDrainJRTaitJL, et al.Quantification of recruit training demands and subjective wellbeing during basic military training. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 7360.
27.
Müller-SchillingLGundlachNBöckelmannI, et al.Physical fitness as a risk factor for injuries and excessive stress symptoms during basic military training. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2019; 92: 837–841.
28.
OrrRMCohenBSAllisonSC, et al.Models to predict injury, physical fitness failure and attrition in recruit training: a retrospective cohort study. Mil Med Res2020; 7: 26.
29.
KreiselBRScottKMFlorkiewiczEM, et al.The relationship between self-efficacy, aerobic fitness, and traditional risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in military training: a prospective cohort study. Int J Sports Phys Ther2025; 20: 56–70.
30.
PopeRPHerbertRKirwanJD, et al.Predicting attrition in basic military training. Mil Med1999; 164: 710–714.
31.
PrinceSACardilliLReedJL, et al.A comparison of self-reported and device measured sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2020; 17: 31.
32.
TomesCDSawyerSOrrR, et al.Ability of fitness testing to predict injury risk during initial tactical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inj Prev2020; 26: 67–81.
33.
PihlainenKVaaraJOjanenT, et al.Effects of baseline fitness and BMI levels on changes in physical fitness during military service. J Sci Med Sport2020; 23: 841–845.
34.
BurleySDDrainJRSampsonJA, et al.Positive, limited and negative responders: the variability in physical fitness adaptation to basic military training. J Sci Med Sport2018; 21: 1168–1172.
35.
SanerNJKuangJChengIT, et al.One size does not fit all: cardiorespiratory fitness adaptations to basic military training are attenuated in female recruits and recruits with high baseline fitness. J Strength Cond Res2024; 38: 1724–1731.
36.
BurbageJRawcliffeAJSaundersS, et al.The incidence of breast health issues and the efficacy of a sports bra fit and issue service in British army recruits. Ergonomics2021; 64: 1052–1061.
37.
DalyDHigginsAHannonS, et al.Trajectories of postpartum recovery: what is known and not known. Clin Obstet Gynecol2022; 65: 594–610.
38.
OrrRMFordKStierliM. Implementation of an ability-based training program in police force recruits. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30: 2781–2787.
39.
RoosLHofstetterMCMäderU, et al.Training methods and training instructors’ qualification are related to recruits’ fitness development during basic military training. J Strength Cond Res2015; 29: S178–S186.
40.
DyrstadSMHansenBHHolmeIM, et al.Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc2014; 46: 99–106.
