This study comprehensively evaluated occupational health, safety, and welfare conditions in small and medium enterprises.
Objective
The research used an integrated framework combining physical, mechanical, and psychological risk evaluation. Given the limited research infrastructure in informal industrial sectors, the investigation aimed to establish baseline occupational health data for policy intervention development.
Methods
This cross-sectional exploratory study employed a mixed methods approach designed specifically for resource-constrained informal sector research. Data were collected from 10 randomly selected SMEs and 1 large-scale industry for comparative analysis. A culturally adapted questionnaire was developed and validated after reviewing existing international tools that proved inadequate for the Indian SME context, including 50 workers selected through stratified sampling.
Results
Workers faced severe multi-dimensional occupational hazards with alarming injury rates: cut injuries (26%, n = 13), hearing impairment from noise exposure (26%, n = 13), respiratory disorders from metal dust (20%, n = 10), skin allergies from metal handling (14%, n = 7), and thermal burns (12%, n = 6). 86% of workers (n = 43) showed complete unawareness of psychological health impacts, while 57% (n = 29) worked excessive 12-h shifts, violating regulatory standards. Critical safety gaps included 52% of workers operating without any personal protective equipment and zero pre-employment health screenings across all surveyed industries.
Conclusions
This study reveals critical systemic failures in occupational safety within SME steel industries, with workers experiencing simultaneous physical, mechanical, and psychological hazards. The integrated assessment approach uncovered previously underreported psychological health neglect alongside documented physical risks. The findings establish baseline data for this understudied sector and demonstrate significant associations between safety practices and health outcomes.
HughesMMustafaM. Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in SMES: evidence from an emerging economy: antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in SMES. J Small Bus Manag2017; 55: 115–140.
6.
PrasannaRJayasundaraJNaradda GamageSK, et al. Sustainability of SMEs in the competition: a systemic review on technological challenges and SME performance. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex2019; 5: 100. [Online]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2199-8531/5/4/100 (accessed 26 September 2025).
7.
VinodkumarMNBhasiM. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accid Anal Prev2010; 42: 2082–2093. [Online]. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457510001855 (accessed 26 September 2025).
8.
BognaFDellGRaineriA. Incorporating internal context into the design of occupational health and safety research and intervention programmes in SMEs. Small Enterp Res2018; 25: 168–182.
9.
BharwanaSAAliSRizwanM, et al. Occupational health and safety conditions in small medium sized enterprises of iron furniture manufacturing units. Environ Eng Manag J2019; 18: 545–553. [Online]. Available at: http://www.eemj.icpm.tuiasi.ro/pdfs/vol18/full/no3/1_62_Bharwana_14.pdf (accessed 26 September 2025).
10.
SharmaBM, et al.Unlocking India’s potential in managing endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs): importance, challenges, and opportunities. Expo Health2023; 15: 841–855.
11.
TakalaJ, et al.Global estimates of the burden of injury and illness at work in 2012. J Occup Environ Hyg2014; 11: 326–337.
ZahoorHChanAPCUtamaWP, et al.Determinants of safety climate for building projects: SEM-based cross-validation study. J Constr Eng Manag2017; 143: 05017005.
17.
MannilaS. Informal employment and vulnerability in less developed markets. In: VuoriJBlonkRPriceRH (eds.) Sustainable working lives. Aligning perspectives on health, safety and well-being. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015, pp. 17–33. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9798-6_2.
18.
MahdevariSShahriarKEsfahanipourA. Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ2014; 488: 85–99. [Online]. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969714005865 (accessed 26 September 2025).
19.
International Labour Organization. Safety and Health at Work: ILO Introductory Report. 2019.
CappellettiRCeppiMClaudatusJ, et al.Health status of male steel workers at an electric arc furnace (EAF) in trentino, Italy. J Occup Med Toxicol2016; 11: 7.
KumarS, et al.Challenges and opportunities associated with waste management in India. R Soc Open Sci2017; 4: 160764.
24.
SchreibauerECHipplerMBurgessS, et al. Work-related psychosocial stress in small and medium-sized enterprises: an integrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 7446. [Online]. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7446 (accessed 26 September 2025).
25.
GarnicaGBBarrigaGDC. Barriers to occupational health and safety management in small Brazilian enterprises. Production2018; 28: e20170046. [Online]. Available at: https://www.scielo.br/j/prod/a/77ygV3GcJDmSDCWbBNtwRTQ/?lang=en (accessed 26 September 2025).
26.
KongtipPYoosookWChantanakulS. Occupational health and safety management in small and medium-sized enterprises: an overview of the situation in Thailand. Saf Sci2008; 46: 1356–1368. [Online]. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753507001361 (accessed 26 September 2025).
NuwayhidIA. Occupational health research in developing countries: a partner for social justice. Am J Public Health2004; 94: 1916–1921.
29.
DidaNDaregaJLemesaF, et al.Occupational injury and its correlated factors among small-scale industry workers in towns of bale zone, Southeast Ethiopia. J Environ Public Health2019; 2019: 1–8.
Ministry of Steel, Government of India. Annual report 2022–23.
32.
PattonMQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. No Title, 2015. [Online]. Available at: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1971430859763109203 (accessed 26 September 2025).
BiberSH. The practice of qualitative research: Engaging students in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Incorporated, 2016.
36.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
37.
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants. 2017.
38.
LoewensonR. Globalization and occupational health: a perspective from Southern Africa. Bull World Health Organ2001; 79: 863–868. [Online]. Available: https://www.scielosp.org/article/bwho/2001.v79n9/863-868/ (accessed 26 September 2025).
39.
BarbosaCAzevedoRRodriguesMA. Occupational safety and health performance indicators in SMEs: a literature review. Work2019; 64: 217–227.
40.
TomitaSArphornSMutoT, et al.Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among Thai and Myanmar migrant seafood processing factory workers in Samut Sakorn Province, Thailand. Ind Health2010; 48: 283–291. [Online]. Available at: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/indhealth/48/3/48_3_283/_article/-char/ja/ (accessed 26 September 2025).
41.
RahmanMAslamMNHSultanaJ, et al.Study of small and medium enterprises (SME) products in Bangladesh: Performance and quality improvement of a selected product. Int J Sci Eng Res2013; 4(1).
TranTTL. Innovations and solutions for Vietnamese Medium-sized enterprises to participate in supporting industries. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://unitesi.unive.it/handle/20.500.14247/8853 (accessed 26 September 2025).
