Since the occurrence of unsafe behaviors is mostly influenced by personality traits and the impact of occupational stress on individuals varies. Therefore, examining the personality dimensions and occupational stress of workers can be used as predictive tools for safety behaviors.
Objective
This study evaluated the link between personality traits and safety behaviors in mine workers, considering occupational stress as a mediating factor.
Methods
This descriptive correlational study was conducted on 600 workers employed in the mining industries of eastern Iran. Data were collected by the safety behavior questionnaire, NEO-FFI personality traits, and Osipow occupational stress inventory. This study employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) techniques using SmartPLS 3 to analyze data.
Results
The results indicated that the personality traits of openness to experience (β = 0.095, p=0.025) and conscientiousness (β = 0.110, p=0.008) have positive and significant effects on safety compliance. The direct effects of extraversion (β = 0.136, p=0.002) and openness (β = 0.149, p<0.001) were also positive and significant on safety participation, while neuroticism showed a negative and significant effect on safety participation (β = -0.099, p=0.035). The results also confirmed a mediating role of occupational stress in the relationship between individual traits and safety behaviors of the workers.
Conclusions
Mining managers should pay more attention to the personality traits of workers, and improving work conditions to reduce occupational stress can lead to increased safety behaviors among workers.
TakalaJHämäläinenPSauniR, et al.Global-, regional-and country-level estimates of the work-related burden of diseases and accidents in 2019. Scand J Work Environ Health2024; 50: 73.
2.
AramSA. Managing occupational health among goldminers in Ghana: modelling the likelihood of experiencing occupational related health problems. Plos one2021; 16: e0254449.
3.
Cruz-AusejoLCama-TtitoNASolanoPF, et al.Occupational accidents in mining workers: scoping review of studies published in the last 13 years. BMJ open2024; 14: e080572.
4.
HalvaniGFallahHBarkhordariA, et al.A survey of causes of occupational accidents at working place under protection of Yazd social security organization in 2005. Iran Occupational Health2010; 7: 22–29.
5.
HaynesSHMayDCLambertEG, et al.An examination of the effects of personal and workplace variables on correctional staff perceptions of safety. Am J Crim Justice2020; 45: 145–165.
6.
TongRYangXParkerT, et al.Exploration of relationships between safety performance and unsafe behavior in the Chinese oil industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind2020; 66: 104167.
7.
ZareARadSYDehghaniF, et al.Assessment and analysis of studies related human error in Iran: A systematic review. J Health Saf Work2017; 7: 267–278.
8.
GongXLiuQYeG, et al.Analyzing the impact of group norms on workers’ safety behaviors in a construction team. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2018, Springer.
9.
RasmussenKGlasscockDJHansenON, et al.Worker participation in change processes in a danish industrial setting. Am J Ind Med2006; 49: 767–779.
10.
IzadiNAminianOEsmaeiliB. Occupational accidents in Iran: risk factors and long term trend (2007–2016). J Res Health Sci2019; 19: e00448.
MullenJ. Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work. J Saf Res2004; 35: 275–285.
13.
DeArmondSChenPY. Occupational safety: the role of workplace sleepiness. Accid Anal Prev2009; 41: 976–984.
14.
LiXLongYYangC, et al.Research on psychophysiological characteristics of construction workers during consciously unsafe behaviors. Heliyon2023; 9: e20484.
15.
DerdowskiLAMathisenGE. Psychosocial factors and safety in high-risk industries: a systematic literature review. Saf Sci2023; 157: 105948.
16.
SeoD-C. An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Saf Sci2005; 43: 187–211.
17.
HessJ. Enhancing innovation processes through the application of emotional intelligence skills. Review Pub Administration Manag2014; 2: 2.
18.
JerabekIMuoioD. The stress profile: The influence of personal characteristics on response to occupational trauma. Occupational Stress: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice: IGI Global; p. 264–305. 2020.
19.
GhasemiRAbedinlouRAlimohammadiI, et al.The relationship between emotional intelligence, personality traits and safety behaviors in metal industries workers: confirmatory factor analysis. Work2021; 70: 909–915.
20.
JohnOPRobinsRWPervinLA. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, 2010.
LonglongZ. Retracted: personality traits that associate with sustainable behaviors perceived by individuals. Brain Behav2023; 13: e3147.
23.
BeusJMDhananiLYMcCordMA. A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: addressing unanswered questions. Journal of Applied Psychology2015; 100: 481.
24.
DoerrAJ. When and how personality predicts workplace safety: evaluating a moderated mediation model. J Saf Res2020; 75: 275–283.
25.
PourmazaherianMBaqutayanSMSIdrusD. The role of the big five personality factors on accident: a case of accidents in construction industries. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy2021; 7: 34–43.
26.
BanduraA. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol2001; 52: 1–26.
27.
WuXLiYYaoY, et al.Development of construction workers job stress scale to study and the relationship between job stress and safety behavior: an empirical study in Beijing. Int J Environ Res Public Health2018; 15: 2409.
28.
PizarroJMFuenzalidaFA. Mental health in mine workers: a literature review. Ind Health2021; 59: 343–370.
29.
DemeroutiEBakkerABNachreinerF, et al.The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology2001; 86: 499.
30.
TongRWangXWangL, et al.A dual perspective on work stress and its effect on unsafe behaviors: the mediating role of fatigue and the moderating role of safety climate. Process Saf Environ Prot2022; 165: 929–940.
31.
ChopikWJKitayamaS. Personality change across the life span: insights from a cross-cultural, longitudinal study. J Pers2018; 86: 508–521.
32.
MorganHS. Personality traits as risk factors for occupational injury in health care workers. 2007.
33.
WangJMHartlACLaursenB, et al.The high costs of low agreeableness: low agreeableness exacerbates interpersonal consequences of rejection sensitivity in US and Chinese adolescents. J Res Pers2017; 67: 36–43.
34.
BradleyBHBaurJEBanfordCG, et al.Team players and collective performance: how agreeableness affects team performance over time. Small Group Research2013; 44: 680–711.
35.
FallonJDAvisJMKudischJD, et al.Conscientiousness as a predictor of productive and counterproductive behaviors. J Bus Psychol2000; 15: 339–349.
36.
DongYLiuFJiangY, et al.Neuroticism and aggressive behavior among left-behind children: the mediating roles of interpersonal sensitivity and bullying victimization. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 11072.
37.
CellarDFNelsonZCYorkeCM, et al.The five-factor model and safety in the workplace: investigating the relationships between personality and accident involvement. J Prev Interv Community2001; 22: 43–52.
38.
HongYKimM-JSohnYW. The relationship between job insecurity and safety behavior: the buffering role of leadership ethics. Sustainability2023; 15: 13910.
39.
YangLBashiru DanwanaSIssahakuF-l, et al.Investigating the effects of personality on the safety behavior of gold mine workers: a moderated mediation approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 16054.
40.
KhandanMKoohpaeiAMobinizadehV. The relationship between emotional intelligence with general health and safety behavior among workers of a manufacturing industry in 2014–15. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences2017; 24: 63–70.
41.
CannizzaroERamaciTCirrincioneL, et al.Work-related stress, physio-pathological mechanisms, and the influence of environmental genetic factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16: 4031.
42.
EbstrupJFEplovLFPisingerC, et al.Association between the five factor personality traits and perceived stress: is the effect mediated by general self-efficacy?Anxiety, Stress & Coping2011; 24: 407–419.
43.
PopoolaBIIlugboEA. Personality traits as predictors of stress among female teachers in Osun state teaching service. Edo Journal of Counselling2010; 3: 173–188.
44.
TabassumMAkshayaI. The Impact of Personality Traits on Occupational Stress and Quality of Life among Higher Secondary School Teachers. International Journal of Indian Psychȯlogy2024; 12: 1153–1176.
45.
KheirkhahMShayeganFHaghaniH, et al.The relationship between job stress, personality traits and the emotional intelligence of midwives working in health centers of lorestan university of medical sciences in 2017. J Med Life2018; 11: 365.
46.
BanfiJTRandallJG. A meta-analysis of trait mindfulness: relationships with the big five personality traits, intelligence, and anxiety. J Res Pers2022; 101: 104307.
47.
XuWZhaoBJinC. A meta-analysis of the relationship between personality traits and cyberbullying. Aggress Violent Behav2024; 79: 101992.
OthmanAKAbasMKIshakMS. The moderating role of spiritual intelligence on the relationship between job stress and job performance of employees in a banking sector. Journal of Islamic Management Studies2017; 1: 89–103.
50.
BronkhorstB. Behaving safely under pressure: the effects of job demands, resources, and safety climate on employee physical and psychosocial safety behavior. J Saf Res2015; 55: 63–72.
51.
ZhangYChenXGongS, et al.Dual hierarchical modelling for the influence of job role demands on psychosocial safety behavior: evidence from coal industry. Int J Ind Ergon2022; 89: 103291.
52.
WangDWangXXiaN. How safety-related stress affects workers’ safety behavior: the moderating role of psychological capital. Saf Sci2018; 103: 247–259.
53.
HobfollSEHalbeslebenJNeveuJ-P, et al.Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior2018; 5: 103–128.
54.
BakkerABDemeroutiE. Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol2017; 22: 273.
55.
CostaPTJrMcCraeRR. Neo Personality Inventory: American Psychological Association. 2000.
56.
Garousi-FarshiMMehriyarAHGhazi-TabatabaieM. The application of the new neo personality test (neo) and analytical examination of its characteristics and factor structure among Iranian university students. Human Sciences (Al-Zahra University)2001; 11: 173–198.
57.
HaghshenasH. Persian Version and standardizljtion of NED personality inventory-revised. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology1999; 4: 38–48.
58.
MahdiniaMArsangJSSadeghiA, et al.Development and validation of a questionnaire for safety behavior assessment. Iran Occupational Health Journal2016; 13: 92–102.
SharifianSAminianOKiyaniM, et al.The evaluation of the degree of occupational stress and factors influencing it in forensic physicians working in legal medicine organization in Tehran-autumn of 2005. 2006.
61.
KhaghanizadehMEbadiASiratiNM, et al.The study of relationship between job stress and quality of work life of nurses in military hospitals. 2008.
62.
SepahvandMJJavadiMMokhtariJ, et al.Assessment of job stress and its relationship with demographic and recruitment parameters in Iranian navy personnel. Journal of Marine Medicine2019; 1: 141–148.
63.
KlineRB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications. 2023.
64.
Hair JrJFHultGTMRingleCM, et al.Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook. Cham: Springer Nature, 2021.
65.
ChinWW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: MarcoulidesGA (ed.) Methodology for business and management. Modern methods for business research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1998, pp.295–336.
66.
HenselerJRingleCMSinkovicsRR. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: SinkovicsRRGhauriPN (eds) Advances in international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009, pp.277–320.
67.
TugadeMMFredricksonBL. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol2004; 86: 320.
68.
ParizadehSSamavatyanHNouriA, et al.Pathology of unsafe behaviors and investigating their relationship with personality characteristics and locus of control in employees of the executive projects of khuzestan province gas company. J Saf Promot Inj Prev2018; 6: 99–112.
69.
MahmoudiSFamIAfsartalaB, et al.Evaluation of relationship between the rate of unsafe behaviors and personality trait case study: construction project in a car manufacturing company. Journal of Health and Safety at Work2014; 3: 51–58.
70.
XiaNTangYLiD, et al.Safety behavior among construction workers: influences of personality and leadership. J Constr Eng Manag2021; 147: 04021019.
71.
FosterJ. How personality influences safety related work behavior. The Online Newsletter for Personality Science2010; 5: 1–3.
72.
TerraccianoALöckenhoffCECrumRM, et al.Five-Factor model personality profiles of drug users. BMC psychiatry2008; 8: 22.
73.
Abu RayaMOgunyemiAOBroderJ, et al.The neurobiology of openness as a personality trait. Front Neurol2023; 14: 1235345.
74.
KenSAlanH. Influence of personality and safety climate on risk perception of Hong Kong construction workers. In: 26th International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (IMECS 2018), 2018; Newswood Limited.
75.
XuXYanXZhangQ, et al.The chain mediating role of psychological resilience and neuroticism between intolerance of uncertainty and perceived stress among medical university students in southwest China. BMC psychiatry2023; 23: 861.
76.
KongWYangYZhangF, et al.Mediating role of occupational stress and job satisfaction on the relationship between neuroticism and quality of life among Chinese civil servants: a structural equation model. Health Qual Life Outcomes2020; 18: 34.
77.
Colodro-CondeLCouvy-DuchesneBZhuG, et al.A direct test of the diathesis–stress model for depression. Mol Psychiatry2018; 23: 1590–1596.
78.
SosnowskaJDe FruytFHofmansJ. Relating neuroticism to emotional exhaustion: a dynamic approach to personality. Front Psychol2019; 10: 2264.
79.
NiaziS. Personality traits as predictor of self-esteem of university students: moderating role of openness to experience. Journal of Behavioural Sciences2017; 27: 102–119.
80.
TianQChengL. Effects of four-week mindfulness training on job pressure, burnout, and coping strategies in sports coaches: a randomised controlled trial. WORK2025; 81: 2631–2639.
