CAD (Computer Aided Design) designers spend long hours in front of visual displays, using specialized automotive design software. In addition to musculoskeletal disorders that may result from prolonged static activities, these individuals are also exposed to high mental workloads.
Objective
This study aims to assess the effect of office strain levels on the mental workload and musculoskeletal disorders of the design department.
Methods
This descriptive-analytical study included 48 cases, consisting of the occupation of CAD designing from the computer design department, and 48 control participants, comprised of non-computer users. It assessed musculoskeletal disorders using the CMDQ (Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire), ergonomic risk with the ROSA (Rapid Office Strain Assessment), and mental workload with the NASA-TLX (NASA Task Load Index). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.
Results
In the case group, 37.5% were categorized as high risk for strain, compared to 31.25% in the control group. 27.08% of participants experienced an unacceptable level of mental workload according to NASA-TLX criteria, while only 17.71% were within the acceptable level. Significant relationships were found between office strain, musculoskeletal disorders, and mental workload, with a direct correlation between ROSA, NASA-TLX, and CMDQ scores (<0.011).
Conclusions
The most significant factors influencing office strain and mental workload among the occupation of CAD designing include ergonomic conditions in the workplace, duration of computer use, temporal demand, and the nature of job tasks. Factors such as health status, physical characteristics, and work experience are crucial in determining the intensity of mental workload and office strain.
Da CostaBRVieiraER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med2010; 53: 285–323.
2.
TittiranondaPRempelDArmstrongT, et al.Effect of four computer keyboards in computer users with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med1999; 35: 647–661.
3.
KatzJNAmickBCCarrollBB, et al.Prevalence of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in college students. Am J Med2000; 109: 586–588.
4.
SauterSMoonSD. Beyond biomechanics: psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders in office work. Hong Kong, China: CRC Press, 1996.
5.
CohenAL. Elements of ergonomics programs: a primer based on workplace evaluations of musculoskeletal disorders. Cincinnati OH: DIANE Publishing, 1997.
6.
SafetyEWorkH. The state of occupational safety and health in the European Union: pilot study: European Communities, 2000.
7.
PunnettLWegmanDH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2004; 14: 13–23.
8.
YektaeeTTabatabaee GhomsheFPiriL. The effect of ergonomic principles education on musculoskeletal disorders among computer users. J Rehabil2013; 13: 108–116.
9.
SonneMVillaltaDLAndrewsDM. Development and evaluation of an office ergonomic risk checklist: ROSA–rapid office strain assessment. Appl Ergon2012; 43: 98–108.
10.
KhanRSurtiARehmanR, et al.Knowledge and practices of ergonomics in computer users. J Pak Med Assoc2012; 62: 213.
11.
Ghassemi BroumandMAyatollahiM. Evaluation of the frequency of complications of working with computers in a group of young adult computer users. Pak J Med Sci2008; 24: 702–706.
12.
EllahiAKhalilMSAkramF. Computer users at risk: health disorders associated with prolonged computer use. J Bus Manag Econ2011; 2: 171–182.
13.
MarrasWSCutlipRGBurtSE, et al.National occupational research agenda (NORA) future directions in occupational musculoskeletal disorder health research. Appl Ergon2009; 40: 15–22.
14.
ValachiBValachiK. Mechanisms leading to musculoskeletal disorders in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc2003; 134: 1344–1350.
15.
SpielholzPSilversteinBMorganM, et al.Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics2001; 44: 588–613.
16.
AminianOPouryaghoubGShanbehM. One year study of musculoskeletal disorders and their relation to occupational stress among office workers: a brief report. Tehran Univ Med J2012; 70: 194–199.
17.
Hassanzadeh-RangiNKhosraviYRoshaniS, et al.Relationship between rapid office strain assessment (ROSA) with knowledge and behavior of the office workers in an oil and gas company in Iran. Occup Med Quart J2018; 10: 17–25.
18.
HashempourFSadra AbarghoueiN. Evaluation, identification & control of ergonomic risk factors in electronics companies (case study engineering company behpajooh). J Ergon2018; 5: 1–8.
19.
FerasatiFJalilianM. Evaluation of WMSDs in VDT users with Rapid office strain assessment (ROSA) method. Iran J Ergon2014; 1: 65–74.
20.
MahlaE. The impact of using ergonomic products on reducing musculoskeletal disorders in computer users through the Rapid Office Strain Assessment method. The 2nd International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Construction, Mining, Oil, Gas, and Power Projects: Iran Seismic Rehabilitation and Strengthening Institute, 2015.
21.
BlakeSMCaspersenCJFinneganJ, et al.The shape up challenge: a community-based worksite exercise competition. Am J Health Promot1996; 11: 23–34.
22.
JohnsonAWidyantiA. Cultural influences on the measurement of subjective mental workload. Ergonomics2011; 54: 509–518.
23.
KoohpaeiAKhandanMVosoughiS, et al.Industrial workers’ postures analysis by a new method named “loading on the upper body assessment” in Iran. Ann Trop Med Public Health2017; 10: 973–977.
24.
Raimona ZadryHDawalSZMTahaZ. The relation between upper limb muscle and brain activity in two precision levels of repetitive light tasks. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2011; 17: 373–384.
25.
WangZLiuHYuH, et al.Associations between occupational stress, burnout and well-being among manufacturing workers: mediating roles of psychological capital and self-esteem. BMC Psychiatry2017; 17: 64.
26.
YiXYangJGaoX, et al.The relationship between occupational stress, mental health and work ability of coal chemical workers in Xinjiang. Front Psychiatry2022; 13: 903534.
27.
AlarconGEschlemanKJBowlingNA. Relationships between personality variables and burnout: a meta-analysis. Work Stress2009; 23: 244–263.
28.
Pérusse-LachanceÉTremblayAChaputJ-P, et al.Mental work stimulates cardiovascular responses through a reduction in cardiac parasympathetic modulation in men and women, 2012.
29.
ChoobinehA. Methods of posture assessment in occupational ergonomics.Hamadan: Fanavaran, 2003, pp.79–96.
30.
BrolinAThorvaldPCaseK. Experimental study of cognitive aspects affecting human performance in manual assembly. Prod Manuf Res2017; 5: 141–163.
31.
SanLArranzB. The night and day challenge of sleep disorders and insomnia: a narrative review. Actas Esp Psiquiatr2024; 52: 45.
32.
Afifehzadeh-KashaniHChoobinehABakandS, et al.Validity and reliability of farsi version of Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ), 2011.
33.
MardiGKouhnavardBAhmadipanahV, et al.An investigation of rapid office strain assessment and rapid upper limb assessment in visual display terminal users. J Health Res Community2015; 1: 25–32.
34.
UlusuHAGencerMGündüzT. Assessment of musculoskeletal disorders and mental workload among office workers in the automotive industry. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci2024; 42: 1519–1531.
35.
MuhammadMS. The relationship between musculoskeletal disorders and mental workload among female computer workers at services sector in Shah Alam/Muhammad Mohd Said. Malaya: Universiti Malaya, 2021.
36.
HoonakkerPCarayonPGursesAP, et al.Measuring workload of ICU nurses with a questionnaire survey: the NASA Task Load Index (TLX). IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng2011; 1: 131–143.
37.
AlipourA. Neck and shoulder pain: Prevalence, incidence and risk factors The IKCo cohort study. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet (Sweden), 2008.
38.
ChoobinehARahimifardHJahangiriM, et al.Musculoskeletal injuries and their associated risk factors in office workplaces. Iran Occup Health2012; 8: 70–81.
39.
MatosMArezesPM. Ergonomic evaluation of office workplaces with Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA). Proc Manuf2015; 3: 4689–4694.
40.
Van NiekerkS-MLouwQAHillierS. The effectiveness of a chair intervention in the workplace to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms. A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2012; 13: –7.
41.
DavidGC. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med (Chic Ill)2005; 55: 190–199.
42.
ArmalAMokhtariniaHBiglarianA, et al.Face and convergent validity of Persian version of Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) checklist. Arch Rehabil2016; 16: 356–365.
43.
RochmanRWZuraidaR (eds). Workload assessment with NASA-TLX and work satisfaction as the basis of improvement of work systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Indian international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, 2022: IEOM Society International, IEOM Society International Warangal, Telangana ….
44.
MaoYRajuG. Prevalence and factors associated with musculoskeletal complaints among Chinese industrial designers: a cross-sectional study. J Public Health Emerg2025; 9: 1–15.
45.
AliDEsmaeilZMohammadN, et al.Risk assessment of computer users’ upper musculoskeletal limbs disorders in a power company by means of RULA method and NMQ in 1390. 2013.
46.
VahdatpourBBozorgiMTaheriMR. Investigating musculoskeletal discomforts and their relation to workplace ergonomic conditions among computer office workers at Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. JPMRE2019; 1: 52–58.
47.
Soria-OliverMLópezJSTorranoF, et al.Do psychosocial factors mediate the appearance of musculoskeletal symptoms? Evidence of an empirical study about the role of mental workload in computer workers. Plos One2021; 16: e0252179.
48.
GrandjeanEHüntingW. Ergonomics of posture—review of various problems of standing and sitting posture. Appl Ergon1977; 8: 135–140.
49.
RobertsonMAmick IIIBCDeRangoK, et al.The effects of an office ergonomics training and chair intervention on worker knowledge, behavior and musculoskeletal risk. Appl Ergon2009; 40: 124–135.
