Organizations face increasing pressure to respond to environmental concerns, yet fostering pro-environmental behaviour among employees remains a persistent challenge. Leadership, particularly green inclusive leadership, is considered vital in promoting such behaviours, but the underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently explored.
Objective
This study investigates how green inclusive leadership influences employees’ pro-environmental behaviour by examining the mediating roles of environmental passion and green self-efficacy. It also explores the moderating role of face consciousness in enhancing these relationships.
Methods
Data were collected through a structured survey from employees in environmentally conscious organizations in China, yielding 356 valid responses. Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) was conducted with SmartPLS to examine the direct, mediating and moderating relationships among the study variables.
Results
The results show that green inclusive leadership significantly enhances both environmental passion and green self-efficacy, which, in turn, mediate its positive effect on pro-environmental behaviour. Moreover, face consciousness moderates these relationships by amplifying the influence of environmental passion and green self-efficacy on employee behaviour.
Conclusions
This study contributes theoretically by integrating leadership, psychological, and cultural perspectives through the lens of social exchange theory. Practically, it highlights the importance of promoting climate action by encouraging organizations to cultivate inclusive leadership, strengthen employees’ psychological resources, and tailor green initiatives to align with cultural norms—such as face consciousness—particularly in collectivist societies.
Statista. (2024, 24 October). Hotel industry in China.
4.
AhujaJYadavMSergioRP. Green leadership and pro-environmental behaviour: a moderated mediation model with rewards, self-efficacy and training. Int J Ethics Syst2023; 39: 481–501.
5.
YanWRafiqM. How and when green agile leadership influence on pro-environmental behaviour. Work2025; 81: 2857–2867.
6.
RafiqMXiuqingD. Green inclusive leadership at the helm: pro-environmental behavior and environmental strategy in steering environmental performance. Leadersh Organ Dev J2025; 46: 416–431.
7.
HanYRenWTangB. Research on the relationship between environmental servant leadership, employee environmental proactivity, employee environmental creativity and organizational environmental citizenship behavior. Work2025; 80: 1782–1791.
8.
HameedRRehamanNShoaibM, et al.Promoting pro-environmental behavior among one belt one road firms’ employees through the lens of green human resource practices. Work2023; 76: 1373–1384.
9.
HuJXiongLZhangM, et al.The mobilization of employees’ psychological resources: how servant leadership motivates pro-customer deviance. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag2023; 35: 115–136.
10.
LiliZRafiqM. The impact of green participative leadership on pro-environmental behavior: mediating role of green self-efficacy and moderating role of environmental awareness. J Hosp Tour Insights2025; 8: 1783–1802.
11.
SenbetoDL. Unravelling green innovative behavior in pilgrimage tourism: the role of learning climate and green self-efficacy. J Sustain Tour2025; 33: 1235–1261.
12.
RafiqMXiuqingD. Empowering green minds: the role of job embeddedness, environmental commitment and job autonomy in promoting pro-environmental behavior. J Hosp Tour Insights2024; 7: 932–948.
13.
BovensM. The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
14.
JiangR. Differences in social media profile picture selection motivation: a comparison between Chinese and US users. 2018.
15.
BaoYZhouKZSuC. Face consciousness and risk aversion: do they affect consumer decision-making?Psychol Market2003; 20: 733–755.
16.
RenTJinXRafiqM, et al.Moderation of housing-related factors on psychological capital–job embeddedness association. Front Psychol2019; 10: 1618.
17.
MolmLD. Homans’s vision of social exchange. 1st edition. London, United Kingdom: Routledge, 2016.
18.
CropanzanoRAnthonyELDanielsSR, et al.Social exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad Manag Ann2017; 11: 479–516.
19.
CropanzanoRMitchellMS. Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review. J Manag2005; 31: 874–900.
20.
RafiqMChamT-HTapsirSH, et al.How does globally responsible leadership promotes pro-environmental behavior through green management initiatives?J Glob Responsib2024; 15: 466–484.
21.
SaleemFMateouSMalikMI. How green transformational leaders trigger environmental performance? Unleashing the missing links through green self-efficacy, green empowerment, and green training of employees. Sustainability2024; 16: 9982.
22.
AfsarBBadirYKianiUS. Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: the influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. J Environ Psychol2016; 45: 79–88.
23.
LiLZhengX. Does subordinate moqi ignite employee creativity? The role of self-efficacy and face consciousness. Chin Manag Stud2024: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-09-2023-0458
24.
HollanderEP. Leadership and social exchange processes. Boston, MA: Springer, 1980.
25.
RenwickDWSRedmanTMaguireS. Green human resource management: a review and research agenda. Int J Manag Rev2013; 15: 1–14.
26.
HarterJKSchmidtFLKillhamEA, et al.Q12 meta-analysis: The relationship between engagement at work and organizational outcomes. Omaha, NE: Gallup, 2009.
27.
JabbourCJCSantosFCA. The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. Int J Hum Resour Manag2008; 19: 2133–2154.
28.
BoiralO. Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. J Bus Ethics2009; 87: 221–236.
29.
GistMEMitchellTR. Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad Manage Rev1992; 17: 183–211.
30.
Setó-PamiesDPapaoikonomouE. A multi-level perspective for the integration of ethics, corporate social responsibility and sustainability (ECSRS) in management education. J Bus Ethics2016; 136: 523–538.
31.
NewmanANielsenISmythR, et al.Mediating role of psychological capital in the relationship between social support and wellbeing of refugees. Int Migr2018; 56: 117–132.
32.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, United State: Worth Publishers, 1997.
33.
AbabnehOMA. How do green HRM practices affect employees’ green behaviors? The role of employee engagement and personality attributes. J Environ Planning Manage2021; 64: 1204–1226.
34.
ParkerSKBindlUKStraussK. Making things happen: a model of proactive motivation. J Manag2010; 36: 827–856.
35.
LiZXueJLiR, et al.Environmentally specific transformational leadership and employee’s pro-environmental behavior: the mediating roles of environmental passion and autonomous motivation. Front Psychol2020; 11: 1408.
36.
WayneSJShoreLMLidenRC. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: a social exchange perspective. Acad Manage J1997; 40: 82–111.
37.
SaeedBBAfsarBHafeezS, et al.Promoting employee's pro environmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag2019; 26: 424–438.
38.
CrantJM. Proactive behavior in organizations. J Manag2000; 26: 435–462.
39.
ThibautJWKelleyHH. The social psychology of groups. Oxford, England: John Wiley, 1959.
40.
RafiqMWeiweiW. Managerial trust outlook in China and Pakistan. Hum Syst Manage2017; 36: 363–368.
41.
WuWRafiqMChinT. Employee well-being and turnover intention. Career Dev Int2017; 22: 797–815.
42.
StegLDreijerinkLAbrahamseW. Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: a test of VBN theory. J Environ Psychol2005; 25: 415–425.
43.
FosterBMuhammadZYuslizaMY, et al.Determinants of pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace. Sustainability2022; 14: 4420. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084420
44.
MuradMLiC. Impact of green inclusive leadership on employee green creativity: mediating roles of green passion and green absorptive capacity. Leadersh Organ Dev J2025; 46: 118–138.
45.
AboramadanMCrawfordJTurkmenogluMA, et al.Green inclusive leadership and employee green behaviors in the hotel industry: does perceived green organizational support matter?Int J Hosp Manag2022; 107: 103330.
46.
LeeS-HWorkmanJ. How do face consciousness and public self-consciousness affect consumer decision-making?J Open Innov Technol Market Compl2020; 6: 144.
47.
RuepertAKeizerKStegL, et al.Environmental considerations in the organizational context: a pathway to pro-environmental behaviour at work. Energy Res Soc Sci2016; 17: 59–70.
48.
WeiHLiZChudheryMAZ, et al.How does consumers’ face consciousness influence green self-efficacy and consumption behavior, and how does electronic and social media persuasion moderate these relationships?Comput Human Behav2024; 153: 108091.
AlshebamiASFazalSASerajAHA, et al.Fostering potential entrepreneurs: an empirical study of the drivers of green self-efficacy in Saudi Arabia. Disc Sustain2024; 5: 21.
51.
BozionelosNSimmeringMJ. Methodological threat or myth? Evaluating the current state of evidence on common method variance in human resource management research. Hum Resour Manag J2022; 32: 194–215.
52.
JordanPJTrothAC. Common method bias in applied settings: the dilemma of researching in organizations. Aust J Manag2020; 45: 3–14.
53.
KockFBerbekovaAAssafAG. Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: detection, prevention and control. Tour Manag2021; 86: 104330.
54.
KniefUForstmeierW. Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behav Res Methods2021; 53: 2576–2590.
55.
NembhardIMEdmondsonAC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav2006; 27: 941–966.
56.
ChenY-SChangC-HYehS-L, et al.Green shared vision and green creativity: the mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Qual Quant2015; 49: 1169–1184.
57.
NewmanATseHHMSchwarzG, et al.The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: the role of entrepreneurial leadership. J Bus Res2018; 89: 1–9.
58.
XueXRafiqMMengF, et al.21st Anniversary of job embeddedness: a retrospection and future research agenda. Work2023; 76: 991–1005.
59.
RafiqMFarrukhMAttiqS, et al.Linking job crafting, innovation performance, and career satisfaction: the mediating role of work engagement. Work2023; 75: 877–886.
