Whole-body vibration (WBV) poses significant health risks, including musculoskeletal disorders and discomfort, especially for individuals exposed to prolonged vibrations, such as drivers and industrial operators. This study evaluates the effects of vibration transmissibility on varying human masses, seat materials, backrest angles, and acceleration levels, aiming to inform the design of ergonomic seating systems that enhance safety and comfort in vibration-prone environments.
Objective
To assess the impact of vibrations on human subjects with varying masses representative of the 50th and 95th percentile Indian male population in a seated posture. Also, evaluate the influence of different seat cushion materials and the effect of backrest angles on transmitting vibrations through the human body at different acceleration levels.
Methods
A comprehensive 4-layered CAD model of a human subject, incorporating skin, muscles, bones, and organs, was developed. Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis was employed to evaluate the transmissibility of vibrations for each condition.
Results
The study revealed how variations in backrest angles, seat cushion materials, and acceleration levels affect the transmission of vibrations through the human body. The FEM analysis, coupled with the detailed human model, provided insights into the potential consequences for ergonomics and overall well-being. A slightly reclined backrest angle (10°–15°) can reduce the vertical vibration transmissibility by shifting the body's center of mass and distributing vibration forces more evenly. Also, polyurethane shall provide good comfort and reduce the effect of vibration on human subjects.
Conclusions
The findings offer valuable information for designing ergonomic seating solutions and emphasize the importance of protecting human safety and comfort in environments prone to vibrations. This research contributes to developing safer and more comfortable seating arrangements, enhancing individual health and comfort.
GolestaniNAbbassiRGaraniyaV, et al.Human reliability assessment for complex physical operations in harsh operating conditions. Process Saf Environ Prot2020; 140: 1–13.
2.
TatsunoJMaedaS. Effect of whole-body vibration exposure in vehicles on static standing balance after riding. Vibration2023; 6: 343–358.
3.
BangaHKGoelPKumarR, et al.Vibration exposure and transmissibility on dentist’s anatomy: a study of micro motors and air-turbines. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 4084.
4.
SinghKJPaleiSKKarmakarNC. Role of contributing factors on health risks of whole-body vibration exposure of heavy equipment and vehicle operators: a critical review. J Vib Control2023; 30: 2338–2355.
5.
BhatiaAKalsiSSehgalAK, et al.Comparative study of different seat cushion materials to improve the comfort of tractor seat. J Inst Eng (India): Ser A2022; 103: 387–396.
6.
KiranP. Effect of air cushion seating in passenger car on different road conditions. Indian J Sci Technol2020; 13: 1224–1231.
7.
GuptaMGuptaTC. Modal damping ratio and optimal elastic moduli of human body segments for anthropometric vibratory model of standing subjects. J Biomech Eng2017; 139: 101006.
8.
DominoniSGobbiMMastinuG, et al.Experimental assessment of the ride comfort of farm tractors. Proceedings Volume: Volume 1A: 33rd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference2013; 1A: 12912.
9.
SinghINigamSPSaranVH. Effect of backrest inclination on sitting subjects exposed to WBV. Procedia Technol2016; 23: 76–83.
10.
RakhejaSMandapuramSDongRG. Energy absorption of seated occupants exposed to horizontal vibration and role of back support condition. Ind Health2008; 46: 550–566.
11.
NawaysehN. Effect of the seating condition on the transmission of vibration through the seat pan and backrest. Int J Ind Ergon2015; 45: 82–90.
12.
JayasuriyaHSangpraditK. Dynamic performance and ride comfort evaluation of the seat suspension system in a small agricultural tractor to attenuate low-frequency vibration transmission. Agric Eng Int: CIGR J2014; 16: 207–216.
13.
BasriBGriffinMJ. Predicting discomfort from whole-body vertical vibration when sitting with an inclined backrest. Appl Ergon2013; 44: 423–434.
14.
TowardMGRGriffinMJ. The transmission of vertical vibration through seats: influence of the characteristics of the human body. J Sound Vib2011; 330: 6526–6543.
15.
PaddanGSMansfieldNJArrowsmithCI, et al.The influence of seat backrest angle on perceived discomfort during exposure to vertical whole-body vibration. Ergonomics2012; 55: 923–936.
16.
SinghKJPaleiSKKarmakarNC. Role of contributing factors on health risks of whole-body vibration exposure of heavy equipment and vehicle operators: a critical review. J Vib Control2024; 30: 2338–2355.
17.
WangKBoonpratatongAChenW, et al.The fundamental property of human leg during walking: linearity and nonlinearity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2023; 31: 4871–4881.
18.
VasconcelosDADuarteMLMDonadonLV, et al.Influence of whole-body vibration on the cognitive ability of reasoning. Cogn Technol Work2024; 26: 37–46.
19.
KouJWangYChenZ, et al.Gait planning and multimodal human-exoskeleton cooperative control based on central pattern generator. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2024; 30: 1–11.
20.
WangZGaoDDengK, et al.Robot base position and spacecraft cabin angle optimization via homogeneous stiffness domain index with nonlinear stiffness characteristics. Rob Comput Integr Manuf2024; 90: 102793.
21.
DongRLuZChengX, et al.Detailed development and validation of a finite element model for studying the entire spinal vibration behavior within a seated human body. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci2024; 238: 9323–9337.
22.
WangSHeJFanJ, et al.A time-domain method for free vibration responses of an equivalent viscous damped system based on a complex damping model. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control2023; 42: 1531–1540.
23.
SunCLiuCZhengX, et al.An analytical model of seated human body exposed to combined fore-aft, lateral, and vertical vibration verified with experimental modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 200: 110527.
24.
XuJChangLChenT, et al.Study of the bending properties of variable stiffness chain mail fabrics. Compos Struct2023; 322: 117369.
25.
HuangXChangLZhaoH, et al.Study on craniocerebral dynamics response and helmet protective performance under the blast waves. Mater Des2022; 224: 111408.
26.
LiangFMoLSunY, et al.Interlimb and intralimb synergy modeling for lower limb assistive devices: modeling methods and feature selection. Cyborg Bionic Syst2024; 5: 0122.
27.
InoueYKurodaYYamanoiY, et al.Development of wrist separated exoskeleton socket of myoelectric prosthesis hand for symbrachydactyly. Cyborg Bionic Syst2024; 5: 0141.
28.
GuXRenH. A survey of transoral robotic mechanisms: distal dexterity, Variable stiffness, and triangulation. Cyborg Bionic Syst2023; 4: 0007.
29.
LiZWangYDuX, et al.ASMNet: action and style-conditioned motion generative network for 3D human motion generation. Cyborg Bionic Syst2024; 5: 0090.
30.
CuiQDingZChenF. Hybrid directed hypergraph learning and forecasting of Skeleton-based human poses. Cyborg and Bionic Systems2024; 5: 0093.
31.
RenBLiuMDingR, et al.A survey on 3D Skeleton-based action recognition using learning method. Cyborg Bionic Syst2024; 5: 0100.
32.
ZhaoYGuoFSunY, et al.Modeling and vibration analyzing of a double-beam system with a coupling nonlinear energy sink. Nonlinear Dyn2024; 112: 9043–9061.
33.
KłodowskiARantalainenTHeinonenA, et al.The use of the flexible multibody approach for lower body skeletal loading analysis. Procedia IUTAM2011; 2: 93–100.
34.
LiuY-STsayT-SWangT-C. Muscles force and joints load simulation of bicycle riding using multibody models. Procedia Eng2011; 13: 81–87.
35.
ShabanaAAGantoiFMBrownMA. Integration of finite element and multibody system algorithms for the analysis of human body motion. Procedia IUTAM2011; 2: 233–240.
36.
TowardMGRGriffinMJ. Apparent mass of the human body in the vertical direction: inter-subject variability. J Sound Vib2011; 330: 827–841.
37.
JainKShrivastavaAMehtaC. Analysis of selected tractor seats for seating dimensions in laboratory. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal2007; 10: 1–10.
38.
KolichM. A conceptual framework proposed to formalize the scientific investigation of automobile seat comfort. Appl Ergon2008; 39: 15–27.
39.
ServadioPMarsiliABelfioreNP. Analysis of driving seat vibrations in high forward speed tractors. Biosystems Eng2007; 97: 171–180.
40.
BresselESmithGBranscombJ. Transmission of whole body vibration in children while standing. Clin Biomech2010; 25: 181–186.
41.
JainAKGuptaBB. A survey of phishing attack techniques, defence mechanisms and open research challenges. Enterp Inf Syst2022; 16: 527–565.
42.
ChaurasiaB. Human anatomy. New Delhi, India: CBS Publisher, 2000.
43.
SharmaSKalsiSSinghJ, et al.Effect on different anatomy layers of human subject during vibration conditions using FEM. J Inst Eng (India): Ser C2024; 105: 59–68.
44.
ChaurasiaB. Human anatomy regional and applied dissection and clinical. New Delhi, India: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt Ltd, 2016.
45.
MehtaCRTewariVK. Vibrational characteristics of tractor seat cushion materials and ride comfort. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control2002; 21: 77–85.
46.
KalsiSSinghI. Vibration effect on human subject in different postures using 4-layered CAD model. Int J Innovative Technol Exploring Eng2020; 9: 168–174.
47.
MehtaCRTewariVK. Damping characteristics of seat cushion materials for tractor ride comfort. J Terramech2010; 47: 401–406.
48.
DewanganKNYaoYRakhejaS. Seat-to-Head transmissibility responses of seated human body coupled with Visco-elastic seats. Vibration2022; 5: 860–882.
49.
KitazakiSGriffinMJ. A modal analysis of whole-body vertical vibration, using a finite element model of the human body. J Sound Vib1997; 200: 83–103.
