Work is essential for social inclusion, yet individuals with physical, sensory, or chronic pain disabilities face unique barriers to employment despite existing laws and policies. This study aimed to model the different employment integration pathways for people with these disabilities.
Objective
The objective was to explore and categorize employment integration pathways for individuals with physical, sensory, or chronic pain disabilities, identifying key factors influencing their journey into the workforce.
Methods
A qualitative phenomenological approach was used, involving semi-structured interviews with 83 participants from urban, semi-urban, and rural areas, either employed or seeking employment. The interviews were analyzed thematically to identify patterns and construct a typology of pathways.
Results
Three distinct pathways emerged: linear, obstacle-ridden, and reorientation. All participants reported facing discrimination, with the obstacle-ridden pathway seeing the highest incidence. Many participants across all pathways were overqualified for their jobs. The integration of virtual platforms in the workplace was seen as beneficial, reducing barriers related to travel and communication.
Conclusions
This study enhances understanding of employment integration for people with physical disabilities in Quebec's workplace and educational systems. Despite laws and policies aimed at promoting inclusion, individuals with disabilities continue to encounter systemic barriers. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to address these challenges and improve employment outcomes for people with disabilities.
MooreMMercureD et VulturM. La signification du travail: nouveau modèle productif et ethos du travail au Québec. Coll. Sociologie contemporaine, PUL, Québec, 290 p. Revue Organisations et Territoires2011; 20: 77–78.
2.
HébertB-PKevinsCMofidiA, et al.Profil démographique, d’emploi et de revenu des personnes ayant une incapacité âgées de 15 ans et plus au Canada, 2022. Ottawa, Canada: Statistique Canada, 2024.
3.
ShueyKMWillsonAE. Trajectories of work disability and economic insecurity approaching retirement. Journals of Gerontologie, Series B2019; 74: 1200–1210.
4.
Organisation des Nations Unies. Convention relative aux droits des personnes handicapées. 2006.
5.
Statistics Canada. Canadian Survey on Disability. 2018.
6.
Statistics Canada. Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017 to 2022. 2023.
7.
EricksonWLeeCVon SchraderS. Disability statistics from the American community survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute (YTI), 2017. Retrieved from Cornell University Disability Statistics website: www disabilitystatistics org.
8.
ClarkePLathamK. Life course health and socioeconomic profiles of Americans aging with disability. Disabil Health J2014; 7: S15–S23.
9.
KwonC-kArcherM. Conceptualizing the marginalization experiences of people with disabilities in organizations using an ableism lens. Hum Resour Dev Rev2022; 21: 324–351.
10.
Statistique Canada. Guide fédéral de référence sur l'incapacité. 2013.
11.
LindsaySFuentesKTomasV,et al.Ableism and workplace discrimination among youth and young adults with disabilities: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil2023; 33: 20–36.
12.
FougeyrollasP. Le funambule, le fil et la toile. Québec, Canada: Presses de l'Université Laval, 2010.
13.
DesplatCEarleTGirardW. L’intégration socioprofessionnelle des personnes ayant des incapacités. Québec: Université Laval, 2016.
14.
Medina-MirapeixFEscolar-ReinaPGascon-CanovasJJ, et al.Personal characteristics influencing patients’ adherence to home exercise during chronic pain: a qualitative study. J Rehabil Med2009; 41: 347–352.
15.
McDiarmidC. Accessibilité dans les organisations du secteur public fédéral au Canada. Ottawa, Canada: Statistique Canada, 2021.
16.
Organisation internationale du travail. Promouvoir l’emploi et le travail décent dans un monde en mutation, Addendum 2020 à l'Étude d'ensemble. Genève: Bureau international du Travail, 2021.
17.
Charte canadienne des droits et libertés, art 10, C12 (1982).
18.
Commission des droits de la personnes et des droits de la jeunesse. Rapport annuel du groupe visé des personnes handicapées 2021. Loi sur l’accès à l’égalité en emploi dans des organismes publics. Montréal, Québec: Direction de l’accès à l’égalité et des services-conseils, 2021.
19.
Vérificateur général du Québec. Rapport du Vérificateur général du Québec à l’Assemblée nationale pour l’année 2020–2021. Intégration et maintien en emploi des jeunes personnes handicapées. Audit de performance. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec, 2020.
20.
SabariegoCCoenenMItoE, et al.Effectiveness of integration and re-integration into work strategies for persons with chronic conditions: a systematic review of European strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health2018; 15: 552.
21.
FougeyrollasPBoucherNFisetD, et al.Handicap, environnement, participation sociale et droits humains : du concept d’accès à sa mesure. Hum Dev Disabil Soc Change2015: 5–28. https://doi.org/10.7202/1086792ar
22.
BarnesE. The minority body: A theory of disability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2016.
23.
GrenierYBoucherNFougeyrollasP, et al.Participation des personnes en situation de handicap à la gouvernance locale : comment mesurer l’impact des stratégies de développement local inclusif? Recension des concepts utiles. Dév Hum, Handicap Change Soc2015: 29–65. https://doi.org/10.7202/1086793ar
24.
FortinM-FGagnonJ. Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche: méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives. Québec: Chenelière éducation, 2016.
25.
NtebutseJGCroyereN. Intérêt et valeur du récit phénoménologique: une logique de découverte. Rech Soins Infirm2016; 1: 28–38.
26.
MucchielliAPailléP. L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Armand Colin, 2021.
27.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJ. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.
28.
WongJSuHKudlaA, et al.Facilitators and barriers to employment for people with physical disabilities: a cross-sectional study. Work2024; 79: 1673–1684.
29.
ShierMGrahamJRJonesME. Barriers to employment as experienced by disabled people: a qualitative analysis in Calgary and Regina, Canada. Disabil Soc2009; 24: 63–75.
30.
LindsayS. Discrimination and other barriers to employment for teens and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil2011; 33: 1340–1350.
31.
SharmaDPrabhuGN. Navigating competency in an ableist world: the lived experiences of disabled individuals in education and the workplace. J Bus Ethics2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-05958-2
32.
AliMSchurLBlanckP. What types of jobs do people with disabilities want?J Occup Rehabil2011; 21: 199–210.
33.
DongSEtoOLiuL,et al.Examining psychosocial factors associated with receiving workplace accommodations among people with disabilities. Work2023; 75: 799–811.
34.
TurcotteM. Persons with disabilities and employment. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada, 2014.
35.
YilmazV. An examination of disability and employment policy in Turkey through the perspectives of disability non-governmental organisations and policy-makers. Disabil Soc2020; 35: 760–782.
36.
LardyS. Rapport d'activités [Activity Report]. Courbevoie, France: France Compétences, 2022.
37.
OsmaniKJDeBackerTKCrowsonHM,et al.Effects of work experiences on the post-school employment outcomes of youth with disabilities: a study of one state vocational rehabilitation agency’s transition program. J Vocat Rehabil2022; 56: 177–191.
38.
PozzebonSChampagneM. L'intégration professionnelle des personnes handicapées: que font les organisations avant-gardistes?Gestion2009; 34: 103–115.
39.
MlynarykCLabergeMMartinM. School-to-work transition for youth with severe physical disabilities: stakeholder perspectives. Work2017; 58: 427–438.
40.
Lengnick-HallMLGauntPMKulkarniM. Overlooked and underutilized: people with disabilities are an untapped human resource. Hum Resour Manage2008; 47: 255–273.
41.
JupilleJDeloffreSLeguayD,et al.Disability, recruitment and job retention: identifying barriers and facilitators from the employers’ point of view. Work2025; 80: 202–211.
42.
Loi assurant l’exercice des droits des personnes handicapées en vue de leur intégration scolaire, professionnelle et sociale, E-20.1 (2004).
43.
HarcourtMLamHHarcourtS. Discriminatory practices in hiring: institutional and rational economic perspectives. Int J Hum Resour Manag2005; 16: 2113–2132.
44.
Office des personnes handicapées du Québec. Une action gouvernementale concertée à l'égard des personnes handicapées, Mise en oeuvre 2021–2024 de la politique, À part entière : pour un véritable exercice du droit à l'égalité. 2021.
45.
HulseggeGOttenWvan de VenHA, et al.Employers’ attitude, intention, skills and barriers in relation to employment of vulnerable workers. Work2022; 72: 1215–1226.
46.
MettävainioBIAhlgrenC. Facilitating factors for work return in unemployed with disabilities: a qualitative study. Scand J Occup Ther2004; 11: 17–25.
47.
Urrejola-ContrerasGPPerezMAHerrera-MirandaF, et al.Adaptations in the workplace as a labor inclusion strategy for people with physical disabilities: an integrative review. Work2025; 80: 962–973.
48.
LabergeMDupontA. L’impact de la COVID sur les obstacles et les facilitateurs à l’emploi chez des personnes en situation de handicap” [The COVID's impact on barriers and facilitators to employment for people in a disabiling situation]. 89e Congrès de l’ACFAS, colloque 448; 2022 12 may 2022; Université Laval, Canada.
