Workplace accommodations play a crucial role in supporting cancer survivors’ return to work. Understanding the available evidence on these accommodations can inform policies and practices that enhance workforce reintegration.
Objective
This systematic review aims to map and synthesize evidence on workplace accommodations for cancer survivors, addressing the research question: How does the literature report accommodations in the workplace for cancer survivors?
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the Journal of Cancer Survivorship, identifying 372 articles published between 2012 and 2022. Studies included were peer-reviewed, focused on return-to-work accommodations for cancer survivors, available in Portuguese or English, and accessible online. The review analyzed studies involving men and women aged 15 or older with various cancer types.
Results
After applying inclusion criteria, 31 articles were analyzed. Research activity peaked in two specific years, but publications were consistent throughout the period. The reviewed studies employed diverse methodologies, including literature reviews, qualitative, mixed-methods, and quantitative approaches. Workplace accommodations were categorized into key themes: organizational changes, environmental support, public and company policies, employer and employee education, comprehensive multidisciplinary support, and communication strategies.
Conclusions
The findings emphasize the significance of organizational changes in facilitating cancer survivors’ return to work. Robust public policies, inclusive workplace environments, and effective communication are essential for sustainable reintegration. Employer commitment and multidisciplinary support play critical roles in ensuring long-term success.
World Health Organization: Regional Office for Europe. World Cancer Report: cancer research for cancer development. Europe: IARC, 2020.
2.
MaherEJ. Managing the consequences of cancer treatment and the English national cancer survivorship initiative. Acta Oncol2013; 52: 225–232.
3.
RowlandJHHewittMGanzPA. Cancer survivorship: a new challenge in delivering quality cancer care. J Clin Oncol2006; 24: 5101–5104.
4.
De BoerAGEMTaskilaTOjajärviA, et al.Cancer survivors and unemployment: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. JAMA2009; 301: 753–762.
5.
WellsMWilliamsBFirniglD, et al.Supporting ‘work-related goals’ rather than ‘return to work’ after cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of 25 qualitative studies. Psychooncology2013; 22: 1208–1219.
6.
DejoursCBarrosJDOLancmanS. A centralidade do trabalho para a construção da saúde. Rev Ter Ocup Univ São Paulo2016; 27: 228–235.
7.
RiosCFMRosslerJH. Labor as the leading activity in the psychic development of adult individual. Psicol Estud2017; 22: 563–573.
8.
SteinerJFNowelsCTMainDS. Returning to work after cancer: quantitative studies and prototypical narratives. Psychooncology2010; 19: 115–124.
9.
WolversMDJLeensenMCJGroeneveldIF, et al.Longitudinal associations between fatigue and perceived work ability in cancer survivors. J Occup Rehabil2019; 29: 540–549.
10.
TorpSNielsenRAGudbergssonSB, et al.Work-related outcomes in self-employed cancer survivors: a European multi-country study. J Occup Rehabil2019; 29: 361–374.
11.
De BoerAGEMTorpSPopaA, et al.Long-term work retention after treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv2020; 14: 135–150.
12.
ZhangY, Wang Y, Wu A, et al.The prevalence and determinants of return to work in head and neck cancer survivors: a scoping review. Springer, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10090-3.
13.
ButowPLaidsaar-PowellRKoningsS, et al.Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies. J Cancer Surviv2020; 14: 114–134.
14.
Stergiou-KitaM, Grigorovich A, Tseung V, et al.Qualitative meta-synthesis of survivors’ work experiences and the development of strategies to facilitate return to work. J Cancer Surviv2014; 8: 657–670.
15.
LizarondoLSternCCarrierJ, et al.Chapter 8: Mixed methods systematic reviews. In: AromatarisELockwoodCPorrittK, etal (eds) JBI manual for evidence synthesis [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI, 2024, pp.10–30. [cited 2025 May 13]. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
16.
ThomasJHardenA. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol2008; 8: 45.
17.
AlleaumeCParaponarisABendianeMK, et al.The positive effect of workplace accommodations on the continued employment of cancer survivors five years after diagnosis. Support Care Cancer2020; 28: 4435–4443.
18.
De AzuaGR, Vaz-Luis I, Bovagnet T, et al.Perceived discrimination at work: examining social, health and work-related factors as determinants among breast cancer survivors – evidence from the prospective CANTO cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health2022; 76: 918–924.
19.
BergerIBeckLJonesJ, et al.Exploring the needs of cancer survivors when returning to or staying in the workforce. J Occup Rehabil2020; 30: 480–495.
20.
ChiuCY, Chan F, Strauser D, et al.State rehabilitation services tailored to employment status among cancer survivors. J Occup Rehabil2014; 24: 89–99.
21.
ChowSLTingASSuTT. Development of conceptual framework to understand factors associated with return to work among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Iran J Public Health2014; 43: 391–405.
22.
de BoerAGTaskilaTKTammingaSJ, et al.Intervention to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015; 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007569.pub3
23.
de RijkA, Amir Z, Cohen M, et al.The challenge of return to work in workers with cancer: employer priorities despite variation in social policies related to work and health. J Cancer Surviv2020; 14: 188–199.
24.
DorlandHFAbmaFIRoelenCAM, et al.Factors influencing work functioning after cancer diagnosis: a focus group study with cancer survivors and occupational health professionals. Support Care Cancer2016; 24: 261–266.
25.
FassierJB, Lamort-Bouché M, Broc G, et al.Developing a return to work intervention for breast cancer survivors with the intervention mapping protocol: challenges and opportunities of the needs assessment. Front Public Health2018; 6: 35.
26.
FryHERumrillPD. Contemporary vocational rehabilitation strategies for people with advanced cancer: a literature review and conceptual framework. J Vocat Rehabil2024; 60: 7–17.
27.
GossCLevermentIMGde BonoAM. Breast cancer and work outcomes in health care workers. Occup Med (Oxford)2014; 64: 635–637.
28.
GrussI, Hanson G, Bradley C, et al.Colorectal cancer survivors’ challenges to returning to work: a qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)2019; 28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13044
29.
JaffeSAGuestDDSussmanAL, et al.A sequential explanatory study of the employment experiences of population-based breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivors. Cancer Causes Control2021; 32: 1213–1225.
30.
KollerupALadenburgJHeinesenE, et al.The importance of workplace accommodation for cancer survivors – the role of flexible work schedules and psychological help in returning to work. Econ Hum Biol2021; 43: 101057.
31.
KongYC, Rauf N, Subramanian S, et al.Working after cancer: in-depth perspectives from a setting with limited employment protection policies. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00962-z. Published.
32.
KurosawaS, Yamaguchi T, Mori A, et al.Resignation and return to work in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation close up. J Cancer Surviv2022; 16: 1004–1015.
33.
MakAKYChaidaroonSFanG, et al.Unintended consequences: the social context of cancer survivors and work. J Cancer Surviv2014; 8: 269–281.
34.
MoskowitzMCToddBLChenR, et al.Function and friction at work: a multidimensional analysis of work outcomes in cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv2014; 8: 173–182.
35.
MotoiNOoshimaASuzukiY, et al.Research on Cancer Screening Promotion and Employment Support for Employees with Cancer at Business Establishments.
36.
PaltrinieriS, Vicentini M, Mancuso P, et al.Return to work of Italian cancer survivors: a focus on prognostic work-related factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 569–580.
37.
SohnKJParkSYKimS. A scoping review of return to work decision-making and experiences of breast cancer survivors in Korea. Support Care Cancer2021; 29: 1741–1751.
38.
StehleLHoosainMvan NiekerkL. A systematic review of work-related interventions for breast cancer survivors: potential contribution of occupational therapists. Work2022; 72: 59–73.
39.
StepanikovaIPowroznikKCookKS, et al.Exploring long-term cancer survivors’ experiences in the career and financial domains: interviews with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. J Psychosoc Oncol2016; 34: 2–27.
40.
Stergiou-KitaMPritloveCKirshB. The ‘Big C’—stigma, cancer, and workplace discrimination. J Cancer Surviv2016; 10: 1035–1050.
41.
Stergiou-KitaM, Dubuis T, Rothe U, et al.Impact of job accommodations on return to work in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv2021; 15: 1–16.
42.
StoneDSGanzPAPavlishC, et al.Young adult cancer survivors and work: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv2017; 11: 765–781.
43.
ThomsonMDSiminoffLA. Managing work and cancer treatment: experiences among survivors of hematological cancer. Cancer2018; 124: 2824–2831.
44.
TiedtkeCDe RijkAVan den BroeckA, et al.Employers’ experience on involvement in sickness absence/return to work support for employees with cancer in small enterprises. J Occup Rehabil2020; 30: 635–645.
45.
Von AhDStoreySCrouchA. Relationship between self-reported cognitive function and work-related outcomes in breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv2018; 12: 246–255.
46.
WuW, Yackel HD, Salner A, et al.Work-health balance of cancer survivors returning to work: a meta-ethnography. Eur J Oncol Nurs2024; 68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102482
47.
van EgmondMPDuijtsSFAVermeulenSJ, et al.Return to work in sick-listed cancer survivors with job loss: Design of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer2015; 15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1051-1
48.
WiseJMKonkle-ParkerDRaperJL, , et al.Understanding the psychosocial context of employment and occupational productivity among women living with HIV: a mixed-methods study. Work2024; Pre-press:1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230363.
49.
da RochaECL, Lucchesi PAO, Faria MGA, et al.Content validity evidence of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work-21. Rev Bras Enferm2023; 76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0453
50.
HoefsmitNHoukesINijhuisFJN. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: A systematic literature review. 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9359-z.
51.
DésironHAMCrutzenRGodderisL, et al.Bridging health care and the workplace: formulation of a return-to-work intervention for breast cancer patients using an intervention mapping approach. J Occup Rehabil2016; 26: 350–365.
52.
Lopes Da RochaEC, Ildefonso APR, Faria MGA, et al.Estratégias de promoção do retorno ao trabalho de sobreviventes ao câncer: revisão integrativa da literatura. [in press].
