There is a paradox in the field of physical activity, where leisure-time physical activity and occupational physical activity have inconsistent associations with health outcomes. Therefore, an increasing number of studies have investigated the associations between occupational physical activity and health outcomes. Given the rapid growth of publications in the field, an analytical synthesis of the literature is needed.
Objective
The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to assess scientific productivity and provide a knowledge structure for the field of occupational physical activity and health from 2004 to 2024.
Methods
Eligible publications records indexed on the Web of Science were downloaded for conducting a performance analysis, science mapping and visualisation. The VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Microsoft Excel were used to conduct the bibliometric analysis.
Results
During the past two decades, a total of 1619 publications in the field of occupational physical activity for health were included. Healy G.N. and Dunstan D.W. were the most published authors in this field (41 publications). The USA (415 publications) and the University of Queensland (88 publications) were the most published countries and research institutions. The knowledge structure in this field showed a path of evolution from observational to intervention studies. Human resource management and organisational behaviour would be future research topics.
Conclusions
Results of this bibliometric analysis provide researchers and other stakeholders with a comprehensive knowledge structure in the field of occupational physical activity for health and evidence-based recommendations for future research.
BullFCAl-AnsariSSBiddleS, et al.World health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med2020; 54: 1451–1462.
2.
HallalPCAndersenLBBullFC, et al.Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet2012; 380: 247–257.
3.
LearSAHuWRangarajanS, et al.The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. Lancet2017; 390: 2643–2654.
4.
BrownJCWinters-StoneKLeeA,et al.Cancer, physical activity, and exercise. Compr Physiol2012; 2: 2775–2809.
5.
PearceMGarciaLAbbasA, et al.Association between physical activity and risk of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat2022; 79: 550–559.
6.
JanssenTIVoelcker-RehageC. Leisure-time physical activity, occupational physical activity and the physical activity paradox in healthcare workers: a systematic overview of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud2023; 141: 104470.
7.
CoenenPHuysmansMAHoltermannA, et al.Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants. Br J Sports Med2018; 52: 1320–1326.
8.
CillekensBHuysmansMAHoltermannA, et al.Physical activity at work may not be health enhancing. A systematic review with meta-analysis on the association between occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease mortality covering 23 studies with 655 892 participants. Scand J Work Environ Health2022; 48: 86–98.
9.
ChengWZhangZChengW, et al.Associations of leisure-time physical activity with cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 44 prospective cohort studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol2018; 25: 1864–1872.
10.
DempseyPCHadgraftNTWinklerEAH, et al.Associations of context-specific sitting time with markers of cardiometabolic risk in Australian adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2018; 15: 114.
11.
DempseyPCBiddleSJBumanMP, et al.New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2020; 17: 151.
12.
ShalaR. I'm active enough in my job.’ why is occupational physical activity not enough?Br J Sports Med2022; 56: 897–898.
13.
ClemesSAO'ConnellSEEdwardsonCL. Office workers’ objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity during and outside working hours. J Occup Environ Med2014; 56: 298–303.
14.
ParrySStrakerL. The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health2013; 13: 296.
15.
van UffelenJGWongJChauJY, et al.Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med2010; 39: 379–388.
16.
RosenkranzSKMaileyELUmanskyE, et al.Workplace sedentary behavior and productivity: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 6535.
17.
AllesøeKAadahlMJacobsenRK, et al.Prospective relationship between occupational physical activity and risk of ischaemic heart disease: are men and women differently affected?Eur J Prev Cardiol2023; 30: 858–867.
18.
NakagawaSSamarasingheGHaddawayNR, et al.Research weaving: visualizing the future of research synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol2019; 34: 224–238.
19.
KumarMGeorgeRJAnishaPS. Bibliometric analysis for medical research. Indian J Psychol Med2023; 45: 277–282.
20.
DonthuNKumarSMukherjeeD, et al.How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res2021; 133: 285–296.
21.
YangZHotterbeexPMarentP-J, et al.Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and cognitive function among older adults: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024. Ageing Res Rev2024; 97: 102283.
22.
YangZChenSBaoR, et al.Public health concern on sedentary behavior and cardiovascular disease: a bibliometric analysis of literature from 1990 to 2022. Medicina (Kaunas)2022; 58: 1764.
23.
LucenaPLCCostaSFGDBatistaJBV, et al.Scientific production on workplace bullying and nursing: a bibliometric study. Rev Esc Enferm USP2018; 52: e03354.
24.
EchchakouiS. Why and how to merge Scopus and web of science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. J Market Anal2020; 8: 165–184.
25.
ArchambaultÉCampbellDGingrasY,et al.Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and scopus. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2009; 60: 1320–1326.
26.
RamezaniMTayefiBZandianE, et al.Workplace interventions for increasing physical activity in employees: a systematic review. J Occup Health2022; 64: e12358.
27.
SmithLMcCourtOSawyerA, et al.A review of occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviour correlates. Occup Med2016; 66: 185–192.
28.
CillekensBLangMvan MechelenW, et al.How does occupational physical activity influence health? An umbrella review of 23 health outcomes across 158 observational studies. Br J Sports Med2020; 54: 1474–1481.
29.
Van EckNJWaltmanL. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics2010; 84: 523–538.
30.
ChenC. Citespace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol2006; 57: 359–377.
31.
GochfeldM. Occupational medicine practice in the United States since the industrial revolution. J Occup Environ Med2005; 47: 115–131.
32.
BasuA. Does a country’s scientific ‘productivity’depend critically on the number of country journals indexed?Scientometrics2010; 82: 507–516.
33.
DingDRamirez VarelaABaumanAE, et al.Towards better evidence-informed global action: lessons learnt from the lancet series and recent developments in physical activity and public health. Br J Sports Med2020; 54: 462–468.
BaumanAMaGCuevasF, et al.Equity and non-communicable disease risk factors project collaborative group. Cross-national comparisons of socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of leisure-time and occupational physical activity, and active commuting in six Asia-pacific countries. J Epidemiol Community Health2011; 65: 35–43.
36.
AsiamahNAwuviry-NewtonKVieiraER, et al.Older Adults’ vigorous occupational physical activity levels in six countries are explained by country and ‘having multiple jobs’. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 14065.
37.
ClarkBKKarthikeyanPBarnabasE,et al.Physical activity and sitting time in occupational groups from Papua New Guinea. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2022; 95: 621–628.
38.
WelkG. Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Champaign (Il): Human Kinetics, 2002.
39.
KwakLProperKIHagströmerM,et al.The repeatability and validity of questionnaires assessing occupational physical activity-a systematic review. Scand J Work Environ Health2011; 37: 6–29.
40.
MaesIKetelsMVan DyckD,et al.The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures. BMC Public Health2020; 20: 1072.
41.
DillonKHiemstraMMitchellM, et al.Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: a secondary analysis. Appl Ergon2021; 97: 103551.
42.
LuoMGuptaNHoltermannA, et al.Revisiting the ‘physical activity paradox’ in a Chinese context: occupational physical activity and mortality in 142,302 urban working adults from the China Kadoorie Biobank study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac2022; 23: 100457.
43.
NeuhausMEakinEGStrakerL, et al.Reducing occupational sedentary time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on activity-permissive workstations. Obes Rev2014; 15: 822–838.
44.
StefanaEMarcianoFRossiD, et al.Wearable devices for ergonomics: a systematic literature review. Sensors (Basel)2021; 21: 777.
45.
BayerlePKerlingAKückM, et al.Effectiveness of wearable devices as a support strategy for maintaining physical activity after a structured exercise intervention for employees with metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil2022; 14: 24.
46.
CampbellMFitzpatrickRHainesA, et al.Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J2000; 321: 694–696.
47.
OjoSOBaileyDPBrierleyML, et al.Breaking barriers: using the behavior change wheel to develop a tailored intervention to overcome workplace inhibitors to breaking up sitting time. BMC Public Health2019; 19: 1126.
48.
ZhenYClaireFGrahamB. Internet-based Intervention Toolkit to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour among University Staff who Work from Home (WfH): A Pilot Trial. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Scottish Physical Activity Research Connection, Edinburgh, UK, 2021 November 11. [cited by 2024 November 16], https://actify.org.uk/module/1631.
49.
AmatoriSFerri MariniCGobbiE, et al.Short high-intensity interval exercise for workplace-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review on feasibility and effectiveness. Sports Med2023; 53: 887–901.
50.
FrutigerMBorotkanicsR. Systematic review and meta-analysis suggest strength training and workplace modifications may reduce neck pain in office workers. Pain Pract2021; 21: 100–131.
51.
SundstrupEJakobsenMDBrandtM, et al.Workplace strength training prevents deterioration of work ability among workers with chronic pain and work disability: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health2014; 40: 244–251.
52.
SafiAColeMKellyAL, et al.Workplace physical activity barriers and facilitators: a qualitative study based on employees physical activity levels. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 9442.
53.
OliverHThomasONeilR, et al.Stress and psychological wellbeing in British police force officers and staff. Curr Psychol2023; 42: 29291–29304.
54.
WangJVeugelersRStephanP. Bias against novelty in science: a cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators. Res Policy2017; 46: 1416–1436.
