Emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and the Internet of Things (IoT) improve ergonomic risk assessment and control.
Objective
This systematic review aims to investigate the use of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in assessing ergonomic risk factors in the workplace.
Methods
This study focuses on ergonomic risk assessment using AI, ML, and the IoT by analyzing published articles in English from 2013 to 2023. The search excluded review articles, books, letters, correspondence, and conference papers. Various keyword combinations related to “ergonomic risk assessment”, “ergonomics”, “Artificial Intelligence”, “machine learning”, “Internet of Things”, and “data science” were used in the search. Literature was collected from Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Out of 140 primary literature sources, 19 studies were selected based on the PRISMA approach.
Results
Some articles (68%) have developed risk assessment systems using AI, ML, and IoT to collect data on workers’ physical conditions and assess their postures. 32% of studies developed wearable devices to predict musculoskeletal disorder risks. Studies employ accelerometers and ML to automatically identify activities, improving ergonomic risk assessment. Researchers predict musculoskeletal disorder risks using computer vision, AI algorithms, and ML, along with ergonomic assessment systems and accelerometers.
Conclusion
Implementing smart wearable devices for ergonomic risk assessment is important. AI and machine learning in these devices enable real-time monitoring of workers’ movements and postures, identifying potential hazards associated with musculoskeletal disorders. This technology improves the efficiency and accuracy of risk assessments, reducing costs and time compared to traditional methods.
Al MainiMAl WeshahiYFosterHE, et al.A global perspective on the challenges and opportunities in learning about rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in undergraduate medical education. Clin Rheumatol2020; 39: 627–642.
2.
ParkJWKangM-YKimJI, et al.Influence of coexposure to long working hours and ergonomic risk factors on musculoskeletal symptoms: an interaction analysis. BMJ Open2022; 12: e055186–e055186.
3.
CostaBVieiraE. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med2010; 53: 285–323.
4.
BriggsAMWoolfADDreinhöferK, et al.Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull W H O2018; 96: 366–368.
5.
BevanS. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol2015; 29: 356–373.
6.
DielemanJLCaoJChapinA, et al.US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996–2016. JAMA2020; 323: 863–884.
7.
HulshofCTJPegaFNeupaneS, et al.The effect of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors on osteoarthritis of hip or knee and selected other musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int2021; 150: 106349–106349.
8.
NasriSMSusilowatiIHHasiholanBP, et al.The risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms during work from home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Saf Health Work2023; 14: 66–70.
9.
RawanMRMDarilMASubariK, et al.A Comparative studies of ten ergonomics risk assessment methods. In: IsmailAMohd DarilMAÖchsnerA (eds) Advanced transdisciplinary engineering and technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp.153–169.
10.
HoeVCWUrquhartDMKelsallHL, et al.Ergonomic interventions for preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck among office workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2018: 1–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008570.pub3
11.
YazdaniradSKhoshakhlaghAHHabibiE, et al.Comparing the effectiveness of three ergonomic risk assessment methods-RULA, LUBA, and NERPA-to predict the upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Indian J Occup Environ Med.2018; 22: 17–21.
12.
KimI-J. An ergonomic focus evaluation of work-related musculoskeletal disorders amongst operators in the UAE network control centres. Heliyon2023; 9: e21140–e21151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21140
13.
DonisiLCesarelliGPisaniN, et al.Wearable sensors and artificial intelligence for physical ergonomics: a systematic review of literature. Diagnostics2022; 12: 3048–3069. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123048
14.
ChatzisTKonstantinidisDDimitropoulosK. Automatic ergonomic risk assessment using a variational deep network architecture. Sensors2022; 22: 6051–6066. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166051
15.
AbdulmalekSNasirAJabbarWA, et al.IoT-Based healthcare-monitoring system towards improving quality of life: a review. Healthcare (Basel)2022; 10: 1993–2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101993
16.
MöckelLMohammadiHFarhang DehghanS. Editorial: the use of emerging technologies in occupational health and safety, volume II. Front Public Health2023; 11: 1–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1200044
17.
BazalukOTsopaVCheberiachkoS, et al.Ergonomic risk management process for safety and health at work. Front Public Health2023; 11: 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1253141
18.
PetratD. Artificial intelligence in human factors and ergonomics: an overview of the current state of research. Disc Artific Intell2021; 1: –3.
19.
UpadhyayHKJunejaSMuhammadG, et al.Analysis of IoT-related ergonomics-based healthcare issues using analytic hierarchy process methodology. Sensors2022; 22: 8232–8248. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218232
20.
ChanVCHRossGBClouthierAL, et al.The role of machine learning in the primary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review. Appl Ergon2022; 98: 103574–103574.
21.
LiuRLiuHCShiH, et al.Occupational health and safety risk assessment: a systematic literature review of models, methods, and applications. Saf Sci2023; 160: 106050.
22.
EdwardsNATalaricoMKChaudhariA, et al.Use of accelerometers and inertial measurement units to quantify movement of tactical athletes: a systematic review. Appl Ergon2023; 109: 103991.
23.
JoshiMDeshpandeV. A systematic review of comparative studies on ergonomic assessment techniques. Int J Ind Ergon2019; 74: 102865.
24.
HouL-XLiuRLiuH-C, et al.Two decades on human reliability analysis: a bibliometric analysis and literature review. Ann Nucl Energy2021; 151: 107969.
25.
NetoIRAmaralFG. Teaching occupational health and safety in engineering using active learning: a systematic review. Saf Sci2024; 171: 106391.
26.
KanadeSGDuffyVG. Exploring the effectiveness of virtual reality as a learning tool in the context of task interruption: a systematic review. Int J Ind Ergon2024; 99: 103548.
27.
SalisuSRuhaiyemNIREisaTAE, et al.Motion capture technologies for ergonomics: a systematic literature review. Diagnostics2023; 13: 2593.
28.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med2009; 151: W-65–W-94.
29.
HeidarimoghadamRMohammadfamIBabamiriM, et al.What do the different ergonomic interventions accomplish in the workplace? A systematic review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2022; 28: 600–624.
30.
LeeY-CLeeC-H. SEE: a proactive strategy-centric and deep learning-based ergonomic risk assessment system for risky posture recognition. Adv Eng Inf2022; 53: 101717.
31.
SenjayaWFYahyaBNLeeS-L. Ergonomic risk level prediction framework for multiclass imbalanced data. Comput Ind Eng2023; 184: 109556.
32.
Concha-PérezEGonzalez-HernandezHGReyes-AvendañoJA. Physical exertion recognition using surface electromyography and inertial measurements for occupational ergonomics. Sensors2023; 23: 9100.
33.
HoareauDFanXAbtahiF, et al.Evaluation of in-cloth versus on-skin sensors for measuring trunk and upper arm postures and movements. Sensors2023; 23: 3969.
34.
HanumegowdaPKGnanasekaranS. Prediction of work-related risk factors among bus drivers using machine learning. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 15179.
35.
DonisiLJacobDGuerriniL, et al.sEMG spectral analysis and machine learning algorithms are able to discriminate biomechanical risk classes associated with manual material liftings. Bioengineering2023; 10: 1103.
36.
ConfortiIMiletiIDel PreteZ, et al.Measuring biomechanical risk in lifting load tasks through wearable system and machine-learning approach. Sensors2020; 20: 1557.
37.
PeternelLFangCTsagarakisN, et al.A selective muscle fatigue management approach to ergonomic human-robot co-manipulation. Robot Comput Integr Manuf2019; 58: 69–79.
38.
SuJ-MChangJ-HIndrayaniNLD, et al.Machine learning approach to determine the decision rules in ergonomic assessment of working posture in sewing machine operators. J Saf Res2023; 87: 15–26.
39.
MassirisFernándezMFernándezJÁBajoJM, et al.Ergonomic risk assessment based on computer vision and machine learning. Comput Ind Eng2020; 149: 106816.
40.
HamiltonBCDairywalaMIHighetA, et al.Artificial intelligence based real-time video ergonomic assessment and training improves resident ergonomics. Am J Surg2023; 226: 741–746.
41.
Antwi-AfariMFLiHUmerW, et al.Construction activity recognition and ergonomic risk assessment using a wearable insole pressure system. J Constr Eng Manag2020; 146: 04020077.
42.
CaterinoMMancoPRinaldiM, et al.Ergonomic assessment methods enhanced by iot and simulation tools. In Macromolecular Symposia, 2021. Wiley Online Library.
43.
HosseinianSMZhuYMehtaRK, et al.Static and dynamic work activity classification from a single accelerometer: implications for ergonomic assessment of manual handling tasks. IISE Trans Occup Ergon Human Factors2019; 7: 59–68.
44.
LowJXWeiYChowJ, et al.ActSen-AI-enabled real-time IoT-Based ergonomic risk assessment system. In: 2019 IEEE International Congress on Internet of Things (ICIOT), 2019. IEEE.
45.
MenchiG. Human detection and behaviour prediction algorithms for robot reactive motion planning. In: School of science and technology. Iceland; Reykjavik University, 2021.
46.
LamookiSRHajifarSKangJ, et al.A data analytic end-to-end framework for the automated quantification of ergonomic risk factors across multiple tasks using a single wearable sensor. Appl Ergon2022; 102: 103732.
47.
HotaSTewariVChandelAK. Workload assessment of tractor operations with ergonomic transducers and machine learning techniques. Sensors2023; 23: 1408.
48.
DonisiLCesarelliGCocciaA, et al.Work-related risk assessment according to the revised NIOSH lifting equation: a preliminary study using a wearable inertial sensor and machine learning. Sensors2021; 21: 2593.
