Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-11
The impact of green human resource management on corporate social responsibility: The mediating role of pro-environmental psychological climate and behavior
Emerging environmental concerns have prompted organizations to adopt Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Traditional business practices alone are no longer sufficient for CSR success, requiring organizations to revisit their business processes and practices.
Objective
This study examines the role of Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) practices in enhancing CSR performance, focusing on the mediating roles of pro-environmental psychological climate and pro-environmental behavior.
Methods
Data were collected through a structured survey from 382 middle- and top-level managers working in large manufacturing firms in Pakistan. Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze the data and assess the impact of GHRM dimensions on CSR.
Results
The findings demonstrate that GHRM dimensions have a positive impact on CSR, with the exception of green training and development. Additionally, pro-environmental psychological climate and pro-environmental behavior significantly mediate the relationship between GHRM practices and CSR.
Conclusion
This study underscores the significance of GHRM practices in fostering CSR and highlights the critical roles of psychological climate and behavior in achieving CSR goals. These findings provide actionable insights for organizations aiming to enhance their CSR initiatives.
RenwickDWSRedmanTMaguireS. Green human resource management: a review and research agenda*. Int J Manage Rev2013; 15: 1–14.
2.
IslamTHussainDAhmedI,et al.Ethical leadership and environment specific discretionary behaviour: the mediating role of green human resource management and moderating role of individual green values. Can J Admin Sci/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L'Administration2021; 38: 442–459.
3.
BudhwarPPereiraVMellahiK,et al.The state of HRM in the Middle East: challenges and future research agenda. Asia Pac J Manage2019; 36: 905–933.
4.
RoscoeSSubramanianNJabbourCJC,et al.Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: enhancing a firm's environmental performance for sustainable development. Bus Strat Environ2019; 28: 737–749.
5.
YanJHuW. Environmentally specific transformational leadership and green product development performance: the role of a green HRM system. Int J Manpow2022; 43: 639–659.
6.
BoxallP. The development of strategic HRM: reflections on a 30-year journey. Lab Ind2018; 28: 21–30.
7.
HameedRRehamanNShoaibM,et al.Promoting pro-environmental behavior among one belt one road firms’ employees through the lens of green human resource practices. Work2023; 76: 1–12.
8.
NausheenHMahmoodYImranM,et al.Impact of corporate social responsibility on value creation: the mediating role of innovative performance. J Manag Pract Human Soc Sci2022; 6: 92–103.
9.
AfsarBBadirYKianiUS. Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: the influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. J Environ Psychol2016; 45: 79–88.
10.
WuWLiuYChinT,et al.Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. Int J Environ Res Public Health2018; 15: 68.
11.
WangZSarkisJ. Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. J Cleaner Prod2017; 162: 1607–1616.
12.
FerrarisABelyaevaZBrescianiS. The role of universities in the Smart City innovation: Multistakeholder integration and engagement perspectives. J Bus Res2020; 119: 163–171.
13.
KhanAJUl HameedWIqbalJ, et al.Green HRM and employee efficiency: the mediating role of employee motivation in emerging small businesses. Front Environ Sci2022; 10: 1044629.
14.
IftikarTHussainSMalikMI, et al.Green human resource management and pro-environmental behaviour nexus with the lens of AMO theory. Cogent Bus Manag2022; 9: 2124603.
15.
RazaSAKhanKA. Impact of green human resource practices on hotel environmental performance: the moderating effect of environmental knowledge and individual green values. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag2022; 34: 2154–2175.
16.
HameedZNaeemRMHassanM, et al.How GHRM is related to green creativity? A moderated mediation model of green transformational leadership and green perceived organizational support. Int J Manpow2022; 43: 595–613.
17.
SaeedBBAfsarBHafeezS, et al.Promoting employee's proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag2019; 26: 424–438.
18.
AnsariNYFarrukhMRazaA. Green human resource management and employees pro-environmental behaviours: examining the underlying mechanism. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag2021; 28: 229–238.
19.
HameedRRehmanNTufailS,et al.Green human resource management and environmental knowledge: a moderated mediation model to endorse green CSR. Front Environ Sci2023; 11: 1136957.
20.
AlSuwaidiMEidRAgagG. Understanding the link between CSR and employee green behaviour. J Hosp Tourism Manag2021; 46: 50–61.
21.
del BríoJÁFernandezEJunqueraB. Management and employee involvement in achieving an environmental action-based competitive advantage: an empirical study. Int Journal of Human Resource Management2007; 18: 491–522.
22.
TurbanDBGreeningDW. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manage J1997; 40: 658–672.
23.
CiocirlanCE. Environmental workplace behaviors: definition matters. Organ Environ2017; 30: 51–70.
24.
PandeyV. Role of HR in creating appropriate environmental awareness avenues using green HRM techniques in Indian organizations: a study of life style and perception, 2019.
25.
BansalPRothK. Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J2000; 43: 717–736.
26.
HuoXAzharARehmanN,et al.The role of green human resource management practices in driving green performance in the context of manufacturing SMEs. Sustainability (Switzerland)2022; 14: 16776.
27.
NishiiLHLepakDPSchneiderB. Employee attributions of the “why” of HR practices: their effects on employee attitudes and behaviors, and customer satisfaction. Pers Psychol2008; 61: 503–545.
28.
OstroffCBowenDE. Reflections on the 2014 decade award: is there strength in the construct of HR system strength?Acad Manage Rev2016; 41: 196–214.
29.
JacksonSERenwickDWJabbourCJ,et al.State-of-the-art and future directions for green human resource management: introduction to the special issue. German J Hum Resour Manag2011; 25: 99–116.
30.
FernándezEJunqueraBOrdizM. Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature. Int Journal of Human Resource Management2003; 14: 634–656.
31.
HicklentonCHineDWLoiNM. Can work climate foster pro-environmental behavior inside and outside of the workplace?PloS One2019; 14: e0223774.
32.
GlissonC. The role of organizational culture and climate in innovation and effectiveness. Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov2015; 39: 245–250.
33.
MorinDPailléPReymondA. “L’attraction organisationnelle: Une recension de la documentation scientifique”, La fidélisation des ressources humaines: Approches conceptuelles et recherches empiriques2011, Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec.
34.
StalcupLDDealeCSToddSY. Human resources practices for environmental sustainability in lodging operations. J Hum Resourc Hosp Tour2014; 13: 389–404.
35.
JacksonSESeoJ. The greening of strategic HRM scholarship. Organ Manag J2010; 7: 278–290.
36.
DailyBFHuangSC. Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. Int J Oper Prod Manage2001; 21: 1539–1552.
37.
ZoogahDB. The dynamics of Green HRM behaviors: a cognitive social information processing approach. German J Hum Resour Manag2011; 25: 117–139.
38.
JabbourCJCde Sousa JabbourABLGovindanK, et al.Environmental management and operational performance in automotive companies in Brazil: the role of human resource management and lean manufacturing. J Cleaner Prod2013; 47: 129–140.
39.
NetoASJabbourCJCde Sousa JabbourABL. Green training supporting eco-innovation in three Brazilian companies: practices and levels of integration. Ind Commer Train2014; 46: 387–392.
40.
SarkisJGonzalez-TorrePAdenso-DiazB. Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: the mediating effect of training. J Oper Manage2010; 28: 163–176.
41.
PerronGMCôtéRPDuffyJF. Improving environmental awareness training in business. J Cleaner Prod2006; 14: 551–562.
42.
GholamiRWatsonRTHasanH, et al.Information systems solutions for environmental sustainability: how can we do more?J Assoc Inform Syst2016; 17: 521–536.
43.
JabbourCJCSantosFCA. The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. Int Journal of Human Resource Management2008; 19: 2133–2154.
44.
JabbarMHAbidM. A study of green HR practices and its impact on environmental performance: A review. MAGNT Research Report, 2015.
45.
DumontJShenJDengX. Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: the role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Hum Resour Manage2017; 56: 613–627.
46.
JiangKLepakDPHuJ,et al.How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Acad Manage J2012; 55: 1264–1294.
47.
ShenJBensonJJ. When CSR is a social norm: how socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. J Manage Stud2016; 42: 1723–1746.
48.
QuinnRESpreitzerGM. The road to empowerment: seven questions every leader should consider. Organ Dyn1997; 26: 37–49.
49.
TariqSJanFAAhmadMS. Green employee empowerment: a systematic literature review on state-of-art in green human resource management. Qual Quant2016; 50: 237–269.
ZhouZMiC. Social responsibility research within the context of megaproject management: trends, gaps and opportunities. Int J Project Manage2017; 35: 1378–1390.
52.
BambergSMöserG. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol2007; 27: 14–25.
53.
NortonTAZacherHAshkanasyNM. Organisational sustainability policies and employee green behaviour: the mediating role of work climate perceptions. J Environ Psychol2014; 38: 49–54.
54.
LeungYWRosenthalS. Explicating perceived sustainability-related climate: A situational motivator of pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland)2019; 11: 231.
55.
WangSWangJLiJ,et al.Do motivations contribute to local residents engagement in pro-environmental behaviors? Resident-destination relationship and pro-environmental climate perspective. J Sustain Tour2020; 28: 834–852.
56.
PailléPRaineriN. Linking perceived corporate environmental policies and employees eco-initiatives: the influence of perceived organizational support and psychological contract breach. J Bus Res2015; 68: 2404–2411.
57.
GaoYLMattilaASLeeS. A meta-analysis of behavioral intentions for environment-friendly initiatives in hospitality research. Int J Hosp Manag2016; 54: 107–115.
58.
VlachosPAPanagopoulosNGRappAA. Employee judgments of and behaviors toward corporate social responsibility: a multi-study investigation of direct, cascading, and moderating effects. J Organ Behav2014; 35: 990–1017.
59.
Jones ChristensenLMackeyAWhettenD. Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: the role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. Acad Manag Perspect2014; 28: 164–178.
60.
SchneiderBWhiteSSPaulMC. Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: tests of a causal model. J Appl Psychol1998; 83: 150–163.
61.
PriesemuthMSchminkeMAmbroseML,et al.Abusive supervision climate: a multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Acad Manage J2014; 57: 1513–1534.
62.
SurrocaJTribóJAWaddockS. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strateg Manage J2010; 31: 463–490.
63.
BoiralO. Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth?Organ Sci2007; 18: 127–146.
64.
RobertsonJLBarlingJ. Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. J Organ Behav2013; 34: 176–194.
65.
LammCMajdandžićJ. The role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy–A critical comment. Neurosci Res2015; 90: 15–24.
66.
PailléPBoiralO. Pro-environmental behavior at work: construct validity and determinants. J Environ Psychol2013; 36: 118–128.
67.
RuepertAKeizerKStegL, et al.Environmental considerations in the organizational context: a pathway to pro-environmental behaviour at work. Energy Res Soc Sci2016; 17: 59–70.
68.
BangwalDTiwariPChamolaP. Green HRM, work-life and environment performance. Int J Environ Workp Empl2017; 4: 244–268.
69.
KrejcieRVMorganDW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas1970; 30: 607–610.
70.
JabbourCJCSantosFCANaganoMS. Contributions of HRM throughout the stages of environmental management: methodological triangulation applied to companies in Brazil. Int Journal of Human Resource Management2010; 21: 1049–1089.
71.
ChouJC. Hotels’ environmental policies and employee personal environmental beliefs: interactions and outcomes. Tour Manag2014; 40 : 436–446.
72.
KimS-HKimMHanH-S,et al.The determinants of hospitality employees’ pro-environmental behaviors: the moderating role of generational differences. Int J Hosp Manag2016; 52: 56–67.
73.
TurkerD. How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. J Bus Ethics2009; 89: 189–204.
74.
AzharARehmanN. Exploring the Nexus of green knowledge and corporate sustainable performance in Pakistan and China. Knowl Manag Res Pract2024: 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2024.2434065.
75.
AzharARehmanNMajeedN,et al.Employer branding: a strategy to enhance organizational performance. Int J Hosp Manag2024; 116: 103618.
76.
PetterSStraubDRaiA. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q2007; 31: 623–656.
77.
IslamTKhanMMAhmedI,et al.Promoting in-role and extra-role green behavior through ethical leadership: mediating role of green HRM and moderating role of individual green values. Int J Manpow2020; 42: 1102–1123.
78.
AzharARehmanNAlyasT,et al.AI Adoption for green performance: an understanding of moderated mediation model. Int J Hosp Manag2025; 129: 104191.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
