Firefighters face substantial physical demands in their profession, executing a range of challenging tasks under variable and high-stress conditions. Understanding the relationship between body composition and occupational performance tests (OPTs) can help to prepare both current and aspiring firefighters for the physical demands of the job.
Objective
To evaluate the relationship between body composition and the completion of firefighting OPTs.
Methods
The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies utilized career or firefighter recruits and examined the association of measures of body composition, body fat percentage (BF%), fat-free mass (FFM), fat mass (FM) and body mass index (BMI), with OPT outcomes. The meta-analysis synthesized correlation coefficients via a random-effects model.
Results
The systematic review included 26 studies. Body composition was assessed through a mix of laboratory and field tests. Twenty studies featured an OPT circuit with simulated fire suppression and rescue tasks. Pooled correlations between time to complete an OPT with fat free mass, body fat%, and body mass index were r̅ = −0.61, r̅ = 0.46, and r̅ = 0.10, respectively. For individual firefighting tasks, pooled correlations were generally strongest for FFM, followed by BF%, with weakest correlations observed for BMI.
Conclusions
The literature indicates that greater FFM and lower BF% are beneficial for the performance of firefighting OPTs, highlighting the importance of focusing on specific body composition measures for firefighter capabilities. The findings can be used to inform body composition screening and training programs designed to optimize firefighters’ ability to perform occupational duties.
OrrRSimasVCanettiE, et al.A Profile of injuries sustained by firefighters: a critical review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16: 3931.
3.
LeABMcNultyLADyalM-A, et al.Firefighter overexertion: A continuing problem found in an analysis of non-fatal injury among career firefighters. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 7906.
4.
MartinZTSchlaffRAHemenwayJK, et al.Cardiovascular disease risk factors and physical fitness in volunteer firefighters. Int J Exerc Sci2019; 12: 764–776.
5.
PostonWSCHaddockCKJahnkeSA, et al.The prevalence of overweight, obesity, and substandard fitness in a population-based firefighter cohort. J Occup Environ Med2011; 53: 266–273.
6.
SoteriadesESSmithDLTsismenakisAJ, et al.Cardiovascular disease in US firefighters: a systematic review. Cardiol Rev2011; 19: 202–215.
7.
PostonWSCJitnarinNHaddockCK, et al.Obesity and injury-related absenteeism in a population-based firefighter cohort. Obesity2011; 19: 2076–2081.
8.
Powell-WileyTMPoirierPBurkeLE, et al.Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2021; 143: e984–e1010.
9.
JahnkeSAPostonWSCHaddockCK, et al.Obesity and incident injury among career firefighters in the central United States. Obes Silver Spring Md2013; 21: 1505–1508.
10.
SoteriadesESHauserRKawachiI, et al.Obesity and risk of job disability in male firefighters. Occup Med Oxf Engl2008; 58: 245–250.
11.
BungumTSatterwhiteMJacksonAW, et al.The relationship of body mass index, medical costs, and job absenteeism. Am J Health Behav2003; 27: 456–462.
12.
CawleyJRizzoJAHaasK. Occupation-specific absenteeism costs associated with obesity and morbid obesity. J Occup Environ Med2007; 49: 1317–1324.
13.
JansMPvan den HeuvelSGHildebrandtVH, et al.Overweight and obesity as predictors of absenteeism in the working population of The Netherlands. J Occup Environ Med2007; 49: 975–980.
14.
HowardJTPotterLB. An assessment of the relationships between overweight, obesity, related chronic health conditions and worker absenteeism. Obes Res Clin Pract2014; 8: e1–e15.
15.
AbelMGPalmerTGTrubeeN. Exercise program design for structural firefighters. Strength Cond J2015; 37: 8–19.
16.
GledhillNJamnikVK. Characterization of the physical demands of firefighting. Can J Sport Sci J Can Sci Sport1992; 17: 207–213.
17.
FerreiraDVMarinsECavalcanteP, et al.Identifying the most important, frequent, and physically demanding tasks of Brazilian firefighters. Ergonomics2024; 67: 111–122.
18.
Flores QuirozNWallsRCicioneA, et al.Fire incident analysis of a large-scale informal settlement fire based on video imagery. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct2021; 55: 102107.
19.
LangfordELBergstromHCLanhamS, et al.Evaluation of work efficiency in structural firefighters. J Strength Cond Res2023; 37: 2457–2466.
20.
StevensonRDMSiddallAGTurnerPFJ, et al.A task analysis methodology for the development of Minimum physical employment standards. J Occup Environ Med2016; 58: 846–851.
21.
PayneWHarveyJ. A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standards. Ergonomics2010; 53: 858–871.
22.
ScroggsKSimonsonSR. Writing a needs analysis: exploring the details. Strength Cond J2021; 43: 87.
23.
SmithDL. Firefighter fitness: improving performance and preventing injuries and fatalities. Curr Sports Med Rep2011; 10: 167–172.
24.
BussJ. Limitations of body mass index to assess body fat. Workplace Health Saf2014; 62: 264.
25.
NevillAMStewartADOldsT, et al.Relationship between adiposity and body size reveals limitations of BMI. Am J Phys Anthropol2006; 129: 151–156.
26.
NorrisMSMcAllisterMGonzalezAE, et al.Predictors of work efficiency in structural firefighters. J Occup Environ Med2021; 63: 622–628.
27.
RasJSoteriadesESSmithDL, et al.Evaluation of the relationship between occupational-specific task performance and measures of physical fitness, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health in firefighters. BMC Public Health2024; 24: 20.
28.
JagimARLuedkeJADobbsWC, et al.Physiological demands of a self-paced firefighter air-management course and determination of work efficiency. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol2023; 8: 21.
29.
WohlgemuthKJJeskoAFrostV, et al.Characteristics of slow and fast performers on a firefighter air consumption test. Appl Ergon2024; 118: 104262.
30.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: n71.
31.
HauschildVDDeGrootDWHallSM, et al.Fitness tests and occupational tasks of military interest: a systematic review of correlations. Occup Environ Med2017; 74: 144–153.
32.
FrostCToczkoMMerriganJJ, et al.The effects of sleep on firefighter occupational performance and health: a systematic review and call for action. Sleep Epidemiol2021; 1: 100014.
33.
MoolaSMunnZSearsK, et al.Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): the Joanna Briggs Institute’s approach. JBI Evid Implement2015; 13: 163.
VandenbrouckeJPvon ElmEAltmanDG, et al.Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLOS Med2007; 4: e297.
37.
Huedo-MedinaTBSánchez-MecaJMarín-MartínezF, et al.Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: q statistic or I2 index?Psychol Methods2006; 11: 193–206.
TufanaruCMunnZStephensonM, et al.Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. JBI Evid Implement2015; 13: 196.
40.
SchmidtFLHunterJE. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. London, UK: Sage Publications, Ltd., 2015.
41.
WelzTDoeblerPPaulyM. Fisher transformation based confidence intervals of correlations in fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol2022; 75: 1–22.
42.
OrwinRG. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. J Educ Stat1983; 8: 157–159.
43.
HendersonNDBerryMWMaticT. Field measures of strength and fitness predict firefighter performance on physically demanding tasks. Pers Psychol2007; 60: 431–473.
44.
MisnerJEPlowmanSABoileauRA. Performance differences between males and females on simulated firefighting tasks. J Occup Med Off Publ Ind Med Assoc1987; 29: 801–805.
45.
MichaelidesMAParpaKMThompsonJ, et al.Predicting performance on a firefighter’s ability test from fitness parameters. Res Q Exerc Sport2008; 79: 468–475.
46.
MichaelidesMAParpaKMHenryLJ, et al.Assessment of physical fitness aspects and their relationship to firefighters’ job abilities. J Strength Cond Res2011; 25: 956–965.
47.
MisnerJEBoileauRAPlowmanSA. Development of placement tests for firefighting: a long-term analysis by race and sex. Appl Ergon1989; 20: 218–224.
48.
WillifordHNDueyWJOlsonMS, et al.Relationship between fire fighting suppression tasks and physical fitness. Ergonomics1999; 42: 1179–1186.
49.
MarvinGSchramBOrrR, et al.Occupation-Induced fatigue and impacts on emergency first responders: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023; 20: 7055.
50.
DavisPODotsonCOSanta MariaDL. Relationship between simulated fire fighting tasks and physical performance measures. Med Sci Sports Exerc1982; 14: 65–71.
51.
MisnerJEBoileauRAPlowmanSA, et al.Leg power characteristics of female firefighter applicants. J Occup Med Off Publ Ind Med Assoc1988; 30: 433–437.
52.
SchmidtCMckuneA. Association between physical fitness and job performance in fire-fighters. Ergon SA2012; 24: 44–57.
53.
RasJSmithDLKengneAP, et al.Cardiovascular disease risk factors, musculoskeletal health, physical fitness, and occupational performance in firefighters: a narrative review. J Environ Public Health2022; 2022: 7346408.
54.
RasJSoteriadesESSmithDL, et al.Association between physical fitness and musculoskeletal health in firefighters. Front Physiol2023; 14: 1210107.
55.
SaariAIRenzGDavisP, et al.The influence of age on firefighter combat challenge performance and exercise training habits. J Strength Cond Res2020; 34: 2500–2506.
56.
XuDSongYMengY, et al.Relationship between firefighter physical fitness and special ability performance: predictive research based on machine learning algorithms. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 7689.
57.
MotaJABarnetteTJGerstnerGR, et al.Relationships between neuromuscular function and functional balance performance in firefighters. Sci Rep2018; 8: 15328.
58.
RyanEDLaffanMRTrivisonnoAJ, et al.Neuromuscular determinants of simulated occupational performance in career firefighters. Appl Ergon2022; 98: 103555.
59.
SheaffAKBennettAHansonED, et al.Physiological determinants of the candidate physical ability test in firefighters. J Strength Cond Res2010; 24: 3112–3122.
60.
RheaMRAlvarBAGrayR. Physical fitness and job performance of firefighters. J Strength Cond Res2004; 18: 348–352.
61.
BlackerSDRaysonMPWilkinsonDM, et al.Physical employment standards for U.K. Fire and rescue service personnel. Occup Med Oxf Engl2016; 66: 38–45.
62.
SkinnerTLKellyVGBoytarAN, et al.Aviation rescue firefighters physical fitness and predictors of task performance. J Sci Med Sport2020; 23: 1228–1233.
63.
RyanEDLaffanMRTrivisonnoAJ, et al.Neuromuscular determinants of simulated occupational performance in career firefighters. Appl Ergon2022; 98: 103555.
64.
ChizewskiABoxAKeslerRM, et al.High intensity functional training (HIFT) improves fitness in recruit firefighters. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 13400.
65.
Marcel-MilletPRavierGGroslambertA. Effect of protective equipment on Firefighters’ external and internal workloads during a simulated rescue intervention. J Strength Cond Res2022; 36: 2291–2297.
66.
ClarkSReneATheurerWM, et al.Association of body mass index and health status in firefighters. J Occup Environ Med2002; 44: 940–946.
67.
CornellDJGnacinskiSLZamzowA, et al.Influence of body mass index on movement efficiency among firefighter recruits. Work2016; 54: 679–687.
68.
TaylorNASPeoplesGEPetersenSR. Load carriage, human performance, and employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Physiol Appl Nutr Metab2016; 41: S131–S147.
69.
MondalHMishraSP. Effect of BMI, body fat percentage and fat free mass on maximal oxygen consumption in healthy young adults. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR2017; 11: CC17–CC20.
70.
SilvestreRWestCMareshCM, et al.Body composition and physical performance in men’s soccer: a study of national athletic association division 1 team. J Strength Cond Res2006; 20: 177.
71.
GendronPFreibergerELaurencelleL, et al.Greater physical fitness is associated with better air ventilation efficiency in firefighters. Appl Ergon2015; 47: 229–235.
72.
JacksonASJanssenISuiX, et al.Longitudinal changes in body composition associated with healthy ageing: men, aged 20–96 years. Br J Nutr2012; 107: 1085–1091.
73.
BredellaMA. Sex differences in body composition. In: Mauvais-JarvisF (ed.) Sex and gender factors affecting metabolic homeostasis, diabetes and obesity. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 9–27.
74.
RahemiHNigamNWakelingJM. The effect of intramuscular fat on skeletal muscle mechanics: implications for the elderly and obese. J R Soc Interface2015; 12: 20150365.
75.
BlimkieCJRSaleDGBar-OrO. Voluntary strength, evoked twitch contractile properties and motor unit activation of knee extensors in obese and non-obese adolescent males. Eur J Appl Physiol1990; 61: 313–318.
76.
MooreBABembenDALeinDH, et al.Fat mass is negatively associated with muscle strength and jump test performance. J Frailty Aging2020; 9: 214–218.
77.
GoranMFieldsDAHunterGR, et al.Total body fat does not influence maximal aerobic capacity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord J Int Assoc Study Obes2000; 24: 841–848.
78.
OlatejuIVOpaleye-EnakhimionTUdeoguJE, et al.A systematic review on the effectiveness of diet and exercise in the management of obesity. Diabetes Metab Syndr2023; 17: 102759.
ChowdhuryRShahDPayalAR. Healthy worker effect phenomenon: revisited with emphasis on statistical methods - A review. Indian J Occup Environ Med2017; 21: 2–8.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
