With the rapid advancement of digital technologies, organizations are increasingly collecting employee data to enhance management efficiency. However, this practice often leads to employees perceiving violations of their information privacy, which can negatively affect their job satisfaction. Despite the growing prevalence of digital monitoring, the psychological and behavioral consequences of privacy violations remain underexplored, particularly in the context of work stress and autonomy.
Objective
This study aims to investigate the impact of perceived information privacy violations on job satisfaction, with a focus on the mediating role of work stress and the moderating role of work autonomy. By applying the Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we seek to provide a deeper understanding of how privacy concerns impact employee well-being and offer practical insights for organizations to balance data collection with employee autonomy.
Methods
We conducted a structured questionnaire survey of 435 office workers from various industries, including manufacturing, finance, services, and internet sectors. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, correlation analysis, and bootstrapping techniques to test the proposed hypotheses. The study employed established scales to measure perceived information privacy violation, work stress, job satisfaction, and work autonomy.
Results
The results reveal that perceived information privacy violations significantly reduce job satisfaction. Work stress partially mediates this relationship, indicating that privacy concerns increase stress levels, which in turn lower job satisfaction. Additionally, work autonomy moderates the indirect impact, weakening the negative impact of privacy violations on job satisfaction. Specifically, employees with higher work autonomy experience less stress and are less affected by privacy concerns.
Conclusions
This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the adverse impacts of digital monitoring on employee well-being and offering practical guidance for organizations to mitigate these impacts. By fostering work autonomy and addressing privacy concerns, organizations can enhance job satisfaction and create a more supportive work environment. These findings are particularly relevant in the context of remote work and the increasing reliance on digital technologies in the workplace.
KelloggKCValentineMAChristinA. Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Acad Manag Ann2020; 14: 366–410.
2.
CharbonneauÉDobersteinC. An empirical assessment of the intrusiveness and reasonableness of emerging work surveillance technologies in the public sector. Public Adm Rev2020; 80: 780–791.
3.
ChengXSuLLuoXR, et al.The good, the bad, and the ugly: impact of analytics and artificial intelligence-enabled personal information collection on privacy and participation in ridesharing. Eur J Inform Syst2022; 31: 339–363.
4.
WestinAFSoloveDJ. Privacy and freedom, ed.New York: Ig Publishing, 2015.
5.
De VaujanyFLeclercq-VandelannoitteAMunroI, et al.Control and surveillance in work practice: cultivating paradox in ‘new’modes of organizing, Vol. 42, pp.675–695. London, England: Sage Publications Sage UK, 2021.
AlgeBJBallingerGATangiralaS, et al.Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. J Appl Psychol2006; 91: 221–232.
8.
AyyagariRGroverVPurvisR. Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. Mis Q2011; 35: 831–858.
9.
McnallLARochSG. Effects of electronic monitoring types on perceptions of procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and privacy 1. J Appl Soc Psychol2007; 37: 658–682.
10.
ZimmermannBMWillemTBredthauerCJ, et al.Ethical issues in social media recruitment for clinical studies: ethical analysis and framework. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: e31231.
11.
BhattPVempralaNValechaR, et al.User privacy, surveillance and public health during COVID-19–an examination of twitterverse. Inf Syst Front2023; 25: 1667–1682.
12.
LangerMKönigCJKrauseK. Examining digital interviews for personnel selection: applicant reactions and interviewer ratings. Int J Sel Assess2017; 25: 371–382.
13.
AlwaliJAlwaliW. The relationship between emotional intelligence, transformational leadership, and performance: a test of the mediating role of job satisfaction. Leadersh Org Dev J2022; 43: 928–952.
14.
RumrillSPBishopML. The role of employment status, change, and satisfaction for people who have completed substance use disorder treatment. Work (Reading, Mass)2023; 74: 355–369.
15.
Nguyen NgocTViet DungMRowleyC, et al.Generation z job seekers’ expectations and their job pursuit intention: evidence from transition and emerging economy. Int J Eng Bus Manag2022; 14: 1940337892.
16.
RafiqMFarrukhMAttiqS, et al.Linking job crafting, innovation performance, and career satisfaction: the mediating role of work engagement. Work (Reading, Mass)2023; 75: 877–886.
17.
LinXSivarakOChouT, et al.Exploring the effect of team-environment fit in the relationship between team personality, job satisfaction, and performance. Front Public Health2022; 10: 897482.
18.
MaX. Is professionals’ information security behaviors in Chinese it organizations for information security protection. Inf Process Manage2022; 59: 102744.
19.
HobfollSETironeVHolmgreenL, et al.Conservation of resources theory applied to major stress. In: Book stress: concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior. London: Academic Press, 2016, pp.65–71.
20.
BaumunkMJTangXRumrillSP, et al.Post-traumatic growth and trauma-informed care in vocational rehabilitation through the lens of the conservation of resources theory. Work (Reading, Mass)2023; 75: 3–10.
21.
NinausKDiehlSTerlutterR. Employee perceptions of information and communication technologies in work life, perceived burnout, job satisfaction and the role of work-family balance. J Bus Res2021; 136: 652–666.
22.
RuinerCKlumppM. Autonomy and new modes of control in digital work contexts–a mixed-methods study of driving professions in food logistics. Employee Relations: The International Journal2022; 44: 890–912.
23.
MalhotraA. The postpandemic future of work, Vol. 47, pp.1091–1102. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Sage CA, 2021.
24.
LuHZhaoYWhileA. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud2019; 94: 21–31.
25.
JudgeTAWeissHMKammeyer-MuellerJD, et al.Job attitudes, job satisfaction, and job affect: a century of continuity and of change. J Appl Psychol2017; 102: 356–374.
26.
TomaszewskaKKowalczukKMajchrowiczB, et al.Areas of professional life and job satisfaction of nurses. Front Public Health2024; 12: 1370052.
27.
KohCWShenWLeeT. Black–white mean differences in job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J Vocat Behav2016; 94: 131–143.
28.
TongchaiprasitPAriyabuddhiphongsV. Creativity and turnover intention among hotel chefs: the mediating effects of job satisfaction and job stress. Int J Hosp Manag2016; 55: 33–40.
29.
PuhakkaIJANokelainenPPylväsL. Learning or leaving? Individual and environmental factors related to job satisfaction and turnover intention. Vocat Learn2021; 14: 481–510.
30.
AshrafMA. The mediating role of work atmosphere in the relationship between supervisor cooperation, career growth and job satisfaction. The Journal of Workplace Learning2019; 31: 78–94.
31.
CheungFYWuAMChing ChiL. Effect of job insecurity, anxiety and personal resources on job satisfaction among casino employees in Macau: a moderated mediation analysis. J Hosp Market Manag2019; 28: 379–396.
32.
SainjuBHartwellCEdwardsJ. Job satisfaction and employee turnover determinants in fortune 50 companies: insights from employee reviews from indeed.com. Decis Support Syst2021; 148: 113582.
33.
StoermerSLauringJSelmerJ. Job characteristics and perceived cultural novelty: exploring the consequences for expatriate academics’ job satisfaction. Int J Hum Resour Manag2022; 33: 417–443.
34.
GrundCTilkesKR. Working time mismatch and job satisfaction - the role of employees’ time autonomy and gender. Int J Hum Resour Manag2023; 34: 4003–4025.
35.
WinkelhausSGrosseEHGlockCH. Job satisfaction: an explorative study on work characteristics changes of employees in intralogistics 4.0. J Bus Logist2022; 43: 343–367.
36.
HarariMBThompsonAHViswesvaranC. Extraversion and job satisfaction: the role of trait bandwidth and the moderating effect of status goal attainment. Pers Individ Differ2018; 123: 14–16.
37.
RussenMPasamehmetogluAGuchaitP, et al.Coworker support in a sexual harassment climate: a conservation of resources perspective. Int J Hosp Manag2024; 119: 103710.
38.
PengJYangXGuanX, et al.Will catering employees’ job dissatisfaction lead to brand sabotage behavior? A study based on conservation of resources and complexity theories. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag2022; 34: 1882–1905.
39.
GriepYBankinsSVander ElstT, et al.How psychological contract breach affects long-term mental and physical health: the longitudinal role of effort–reward imbalance. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being2021; 13: 263–281.
40.
BhaveDPTeoLHDalalRS. Privacy at work: a review and a research agenda for a contested terrain. J Manag2020; 46: 127–164.
41.
LiHSarathyRXuH. The role of affect and cognition on online consumers’ decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decis Support Syst2011; 51: 434–445.
42.
ClausenTPedersenLRMAndersenMF, et al.Job autonomy and psychological well-being: a linear or a non-linear association?Eur J Work Organ Psychol2022; 31: 395–405.
43.
ShawWSMainCJFindleyPA, et al.Opening the workplace after COVID-19: what lessons can be learned from return-to-work research?J Occup Rehabil2020; 30: 299–302.
44.
ChangYWongSFLibaque-SaenzCF, et al.The role of privacy policy on consumers’ perceived privacy. Gov Inf Q2018; 35: 445–459.
45.
ChoiHParkJJungY. The role of privacy fatigue in online privacy behavior. Comput Hum Behav2018; 81: 42–51.
46.
SamaranayakeVGamageC. Employee perception towards electronic monitoring at work place and its impact on job satisfaction of software professionals in Sri Lanka. Telemat Inform2012; 29: 233–244.
47.
AreheartBARobertsJL. Gina, big data, and the future of employee privacy. Yale Law J2019; 128: 710–790.
48.
HobfollSEHalbeslebenJNeveuJ, et al.Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav2018; 5: 103–128.
49.
GerichJLehnerR. Escape or activate? Pathways of work stress on substance use. Work2023; 74: 193–206.
50.
WallJLowryPBarlowJ. Organizational violations of externally governed privacy and security rules: explaining and predicting selective violations under conditions of strain and excess. J Assoc Inf Syst2016; 17: 39–76.
51.
NeupaneSNygårdC. Physical and mental strain at work: relationships with onset and persistent of multi-site pain in a four-year follow up. Int J Ind Ergon2017; 60: 47–52.
52.
BudakJRajhESlijepčevićS, et al.Conceptual research framework of consumer resilience to privacy violation online. Sustainability2021; 13: 1238.
53.
YangQHuoJXiY. Exploring the risk-taking tendency among migrant workers in the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of ontological security. Work (Reading, Mass)2021; 68: 269–283.
54.
ChenHQiR. Restaurant frontline employees’ turnover intentions: three-way interactions between job stress, fear of COVID-19, and resilience. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag2022; 34: 2535–2558.
55.
LangeMKayserI. The role of self-efficacy, work-related autonomy and work-family conflict on employee's stress level during home-based remote work in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 4955.
56.
MaEDuJXuST, et al.When proactive employees meet the autonomy of work—a moderated mediation model based on agency theory and job characteristics theory. Int J Hosp Manag2022; 107: 103326.
57.
MalinowskaDTokarzAWardzichowskaA. Job autonomy in relation to work engagement and workaholism: mediation of autonomous and controlled work motivation. Int J Occup Med Environ Health2018; 31: 445–458.
58.
BousinakisDHalkosG. Creativity as the hidden development factor for organizations and employees. Econ Anal Policy2021; 71: 645–659.
59.
JuyalR. Preserving personal autonomy: exploring the importance of privacy rights, their impact on society, and threats to privacy in the digital age. In: Book global perspectives on social media usage within governments.Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2023, pp.226–235.
60.
HarborthD. Human autonomy in the era of augmented reality—a roadmap for future work. Information2022; 13: 89.
61.
LeeCLeeCCKimS. Understanding information security stress: focusing on the type of information security compliance activity. Comput Secur2016; 59: 60–70.
62.
CohenLHTowbesLCFloccoR. Effects of induced mood on self-reported life events and perceived and received social support. J Pers Soc Psychol1988; 55: 669–674.
63.
IdaszakJRDrasgowFGuionR. A revision of the job diagnostic survey: elimination of a measurement artifact. J Appl Psychol1987; 72: 69–74.
64.
El BadawyTAMagdyMM. Assessing the impact of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction: an empirical study on faculty members with respect to gender and age. International Business Research2015; 8: 67.
65.
MotowidloSJPackardJSManningMR, et al.Occupational stress: its causes and consequences for job performance. J Appl Psychol1986; 71: 618–629.
66.
BrayfieldAHRotheHF. An index of job satisfaction. J Appl Psychol1951; 35: 307–311.
67.
SunZLiJLiB, et al.Digital leadership and deviant innovation: the roles of innovation self-efficacy and employee ambitions. Curr Psychol2024; 43: 1–12.
68.
Aguirre-UrretaMIHuJ. Detecting common method bias: performance of the harman's single-factor test. Acm Sigmis Database: Database Adv Inf Syst2019; 50: 45–70.
69.
PodsakoffPMMackenzieSBLeeJ, et al.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol2003; 88: 879–903.
70.
KockN. Common method bias in pls-sem: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int J E-Collab2015; 11: 1–10.
71.
FengWYanZZhangH, et al.A survey on security, privacy, and trust in mobile crowdsourcing. Ieee Internet Things J2018; 5: 2971–2992.
72.
ChenHSJaiTC. Trust fall: data breach perceptions from loyalty and non-loyalty customers. Servi Ind J2021; 41: 947–963.
73.
KalischkoTRiedlR. Electronic performance monitoring in the digital workplace: conceptualization, review of effects and moderators, and future research opportunities. Front Psychol2021; 12: 633031.
74.
AjunwaICrawfordKSchultzJ. Limitless worker surveillance. Calif Law Rev2017; 105: 735–776.
75.
SmithHJDinevTXuH. Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. Mis Q2011; 35: 989–1015.
76.
CulnanMJArmstrongPK. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organ Science (Providence, RI)1999; 10: 104–115.
77.
LindebaumDGeddesDGabrielY. Moral emotions and ethics in organisations: introduction to the special issue. J Bus Ethics2017; 141: 645–656.
78.
ParkerSKGroteG. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl Psychol2022; 71: 1171–1204.
79.
AlalwanAABaabdullahAMAl-DebeiMM, et al.Fintech and contactless payment: help or hindrance? The role of invasion of privacy and information disclosure. Int J Bank Mark2024; 42: 66–93.
80.
YazdanmehrALiYWangJ. Employee responses to information security related stress: coping and violation intention. Inf Syst J (Oxford, England)2023; 33: 598–639.
