Mood disorders and stress-related disorders are the two leading causes of long-term employee absenteeism and cause significant social losses. Therefore, strengthening the support systems is essential to help employees return to work.
Objective:
This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of a return to work (RTW) rehabilitation program and to explore factors associated with RTW and continued employment.
Methods:
A five-times-a-week RTW intervention was implemented for three to four months for people on leave who had been diagnosed with a mood or stress-related disorder. RTW rates within one year of completing the program and RTW retention rates one year after returning to work were examined to explore factors associated with RTW and employment retention.
Results:
Of the 47 participants, 41 completed the RTW intervention, 35 returned to work (85.4%) within one year after the intervention, and 29 were still working one-year post their RTW (82.9%). The non-RTW group had a lower attendance rate for the program and showed an increase in anxious temperament. Additionally, compared to the RTW group, the non-RTW group showed significantly lower interpersonal relationship scores and decreased finger dexterity in the post-program evaluation, which may be associated with difficulties in returning to work. There was little improvement in cognitive function in the RTW non-continuation group, with a disrupted rhythm of life, depression, panic, and non-assertive self-expression.
Conclusion:
The RTW intervention demonstrated effectiveness for treating patients with mood and stress-related disorders. Future studies should investigate comparative trials with a control group while also increasing the sample size.
LidwallU. Sick leave diagnoses and return to work: a Swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil2015; 37: 396–410.
2.
KoopmansPCBültmannURoelenCAM, et al.Recurrence of sickness absence due to common mental disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2011; 84: 193–201.
3.
ShielsCGabbayMBFordFM. Patient factors associated with duration of certified sickness absence and transition to long-term incapacity. Br J Gen Pract2004; 54: 86–91. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314799/
4.
EndoMMutoTHaruyamaY, et al.Risk factors of recurrent sickness absence due to depression: a two-year cohort study among Japanese employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2015; 88: 75–83.
5.
KoopmansPCRoelenCAMBültmannU, et al.Gender and age differences in the recurrence of sickness absence due to common mental disorders: a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health2010; 10: 426.
6.
AsamiYGorenAOkumuraY. Work productivity loss with depression, diagnosed and undiagnosed, among workers in an internet-based survey conducted in Japan. J Occup Environ Med2015; 57: 105–110.
7.
BeckACrainALSolbergLI, et al.Severity of depression and magnitude of productivity loss. Ann Fam Med2011; 9: 305–311.
8.
NieuwenhuijsenKVerbeekJHNeumeyer-GromenA, et al.Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020; 10: CD006237.
9.
DalgaardVLAschbacherKAndersenJH, et al.Return to work after work-related stress: a randomised controlled trial of a work-focused cognitive behavioural intervention. Scand J Work Environ Health2017; 43: 436–446.
10.
SalomonssonSSantoftFLindsäterE, et al.Effects of cognitive behavioural therapy and return to work intervention for patients on sick leave due to stress-related disorders: results from a randomized trial. Scand J Psychol2020; 61: 281–289.
11.
NoordikEvan der KlinkJJGeskusRB, et al.Effectiveness of an exposure-based return to work program for workers on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health2013; 39: 144–154.
12.
RebergenDSBruinvelsDJBezemerPD, et al.Guideline-based care of common mental disorders by occupational physicians (CO-OP study): a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Environ Med2009; 51: 305–312.
13.
BjörkelundCSvenningssonIHangeD, et al.Clinical effectiveness of care managers in collaborative care for patients with depression in Swedish primary health care: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract2018; 19: 28.
14.
FolkeFParlingTMelinL. Acceptance and commitment therapy for depression: a preliminary randomized clinical trial for unemployed on long-term sick leave. Cogn Behav Pract2012; 19: 583–594.
15.
HellströmLBechPHjorthøjC, et al.Effect on return to work or education of individual placement and support modified for people with mood and anxiety disorders: results of a randomised clinical trial. Occup Environ Med2017; 74: 717–725. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26578252
16.
HeesHLde VriesGKoeterMW, et al.Adjuvant occupational therapy improves long-term depression recovery and return to work in good health in sick-listed employees with major depression: results of a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med2013; 70: 252–260.
17.
ScheneAHKoeterMWKikkertMJ, et al.Adjuvant occupational therapy for work-related major depression works: randomized trial including economic evaluation. Psychol Med2007; 37: 351–362.
SakaiYAkiyamaT. The present and future possibility of return-to-work assist programmes for patients with depressive disorders. Job Stress Res2012; 19: 217–225.
20.
Research on support measures for returning to work and adapting to the workplace for workers with mental health disorders centred on depression, https://mhlw-grants.niph.go.jp/project/7699 (2002, accessed 28 November 2023). [in Japanese].
AkiyamaTTsuchiyaMIgarashiY, et al.“Rework program” in Japan: innovative high-level rehabilitation. Asia-Pac Psychiatry2010; 2: 208–216.
23.
ArimaHAkiyamaTde MouraPA, et al.Resilience building for mood disorders: theoretical introduction and the achievements of the Re-work program in Japan. Asian J Psychiatr2021; 58: 102580.
24.
LagerveldSEBültmannUFrancheRL, et al.Factors associated with work participation and work functioning in depressed workers: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil2010; 20: 275–292.
25.
ErvastiJJoensuuMPenttiJ, et al.Prognostic factors for return to work after depression related work disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res2017; 95: 28–36.
26.
FiskerJHjorthøjCHellströmL, et al.Predictors of return to work for people on sick leave with common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2022; 95: 1–13.
27.
SakaiKAkiyamaTTsuchiyaS, et al.A study of inter-reviewer reliability, internal consistence and forecast validity of the readiness for return to work evaluation sheet (psychiatric rework readiness scale). Jpn J Psychiatr Treat2012; 27: 655–667. in Japanese.
28.
TanakaSKugeRINakanoM, et al.Outcomes of an interdisciplinary return to work intervention including occupational therapy for mood and adjustment disorders: a single-arm clinical trial. Work2023; 74: 515–530.
29.
JelinekLMoritzSHauschildtM. Patients’ perspectives on treatment with metacognitive training for depression (D-MCT): results on acceptability. J Affect Disord2017; 221: 17–24.
30.
HamiltonM. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1960; 23: 56–62.
31.
YoungRCBiggsJTZieglerVE, et al.A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry1978; 133: 429–435.
32.
KanedaYSumiyoshiTKeefeR, et al.Brief assessment of cognition in schizophrenia: validation of the Japanese version. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci2007; 61: 602–609.
33.
AkiskalHSAkiskalKKHaykalRF, et al.TEMPS-A: progress towards validation of a self-rated clinical version of the temperament evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and san diego autoquestionnaire. J Affect Disord2005; 85: 3–16.
34.
BoscMDubiniAPolinV. Development and validation of a social functioning scale, the social adaptation self-evaluation scale. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol1997; 7(Suppl 1): S57–S70. discussion S71–3.
35.
GotoMUedaNYoshimuraR. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the social adaptation self-evaluation scale (SASS). Clin Psychiatry2005; 47: 483–489. in Japanese.
36.
Employment Security Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. General aptitude test battery (GATB), employment problem research association. 2002: 15–45. in Japanese.
37.
HoriiSSakaiYTagawaA, et al.Predictive validity of the psychiatric rework readiness scale for work continuation for participants in the Re-work programme aiming to increase the resilience of patients returning to work with mental illness: factors influencing work continuation. Psychiatria et Neuroligia Japonica2019; 121: 445–456. in Japanese.
38.
HoriHKatsukiAAtakeK. Risk factors for further sick leave among Japanese workers returning to work after an episode of major depressive disorder: a prospective follow-up study over 1 year. BMJ Open2019; 9: e029705.
39.
KitagawaNKatoYWatanabeN, et al.Practice and efficacy of reinstatement support programme for patients with depression. Jpn J Psychosom Med2009; 49: 123–131. in Japanese.
40.
HirasawaTNogiwaY. What leads to successful employment after re-work programme?Jpn J Occup Ther2011; 30: 707–716. in Japanese.
41.
Japanese Association of Rework Depression, https://utsu-rework.org/info/ (2018, accessed 28 November 2023). [in Japanese].
42.
WiesenthalAKrupaTKirshBH, et al.Cognitive work hardening for return to work following depression: an intervention study: le réentraînement cognitif au travail pour favoriser le retour au travail à la suite d’ une depression: étude d’intervention. Can J Occup Ther2018; 85: 21–32.
43.
JoosenMCWBrouwersEPMvan BeurdenKM, et al.An international comparison of occupational health guidelines for the management of mental disorders and stress-related psychological symptoms. Occup Environ Med2015; 72: 313–322.
44.
DewaCSTrojanowskiLJoosenMCW, et al.Employer best practice guidelines for the return to work of workers on mental disorder-related disability leave: a systematic review. Can J Psychiatry2016; 61: 176–185.
45.
EskilssonTNorlundSLehtiA, et al.Enhanced capacity to act: managers’ perspectives when participating in a dialogue-based workplace intervention for employee return to work. J Occup Rehabil2021; 31: 263–274.
46.
StrömbäckMFjellman-WiklundAKeisuS, et al.Restoring confidence in return to work: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with exhaustion disorder after a dialogue-based workplace intervention. PLoS One2020; 15: e0234897.
47.
MuschallaB. Work-anxiety rather than cognitive performance contributes to workability decisions in patients with mental disorders. J Occup Environ Med2018; 60: 1042–1048.
48.
GragnanoANegriniAMigliorettiM, et al.Common psychosocial factors predicting return to work after common mental disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers: a review supporting a cross-disease approach. J Occup Rehabil2018; 28: 215–231.
49.
McIntyreRSChaDSSoczynskaJK, et al.Cognitive deficits and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: determinants, substrates, and treatment interventions. Depress Anxiety2013; 30: 515–527.
50.
BergdoltJSellinPDriessenM, et al.Neuropsychological predictors of vocational rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with major depression: a scoping review. Front Psychiatry2022; 13: 942161.
51.
SakaiYAkiyamaTMiyakeY, et al.Temperament and job stress in Japanese company employees. J Affect Disord2005; 85: 101–112.
52.
DeguchiYIwasakiSKonishiA, et al.The usefulness of assessing and identifying workers’ temperaments and their effects on occupational stress in the workplace. PLoS One2016; 11: e0156339.
53.
BuselliRVeltriACorsiM, et al.Affective temperament and mood spectrum symptoms in workers suffering from work-related stress disorders. J Affect Disord2022; 317: 354–359.
