The rates of return to work (RTW) following complex orthopaedic injury are low. No review has summarised current knowledge and prognostic factors for RTW in these patients.
Objectives:
This scoping review presents the nature and the extent of current research evidence for the prognostic factors of RTW following complex orthopaedic injury.
Methods:
This review was designed using the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Online databases were searched for articles (1969–2023) which covered: return to work, complex orthopaedic injury, and prognostic factors. Complex orthopaedic injury is defined as multiple fractures, open fractures, high energy pelvic injuries or polytrauma with related orthopaedic injury. Data were extracted and placed into an evidence table.
Results:
Eleven studies were eligible for inclusion. All but one were prospective cohort in design with small patient numbers. There was a skew for studies of open tibial fractures. There was limited breadth of tested prognostic factors. The only commonly reported statistically significant prognostic factors were age, ISS classification and nature of work. Endpoints for RTW ranged from 3 months to 8 years, preventing the pooling of data for meta-analyses.
Conclusion:
In summary, there is a limited understanding of prognostic factors for RTW following complex orthopaedic injury. Estimates for RTW following these injuries range from 16–90%. The authors recommend that future studies take a holistic approach, using the biopsychosocial model, when investigating prognostic factors for RTW in these patients. This study offers guidance on qualitative investigation, investigative variables and mechanisms to achieve this.
SilvesterLTrompeterAHingC. Patient experiences of rehabilitation following traumatic complex musculoskeletal injury – A mixed methods pilot study. Trauma2022; 24: 218–225.
2.
HerronJHutchinsonRLeckyF, et al.The impact of age on major orthopaedic trauma: an analysis of the United Kingdom trauma audit research network database. Bone Joint J2017; 99-B: 1677–1680.
EngelGL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science1977; 196: 129–136.
7.
SeverinssonYGrimby-EkmanANordemanL, et al.Components of primary care multimodal rehabilitation and their association with changes in sick leave: an observational study. Work2023; 74: 907–917.
8.
PahlplatzTMJSchafrothMUKrijgerC, et al.Beneficial and limiting factors in return to work after primary total knee replacement: patients’ perspective. Work2021; 69: 895–902.
9.
StewartDAl HailMAl-ShaibiS, et al.A scoping review of theories used to investigate clinician adherence to clinical practice guidelines. Int J Clin Pharm2023; 45: 52–63.
10.
AmundsenOMogerTAHolteJH, et al.Patient characteristics and healthcare use for high-cost patients with musculoskeletal disorders in Norway: a cohort study. BMC Health Services Research2024; 24: 1583.
11.
DuongHPGarciaAHilfikerR, et al.Systematic review of biopsychosocial prognostic factors for return to work after acute orthopedic trauma: a 2020 update. Front Rehabil Sci2021; 2: 791351.
12.
KalskiLClaußenLHofmannMA, et al.Health-related risk factors for subsequent work disability: a systematic literature review. Work2025; 0: 10519815241290109.
13.
ClayFJNewsteadSVMcClureRJ. A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma. Injury2010; 41: 787–803.
14.
McPeakeJMikkelsenMEQuasimT, et al.Return to employment after critical illness and its association with psychosocial outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc2019; 16: 1304–1311.
15.
WagmanPGunnarssonABHjärthagF, et al.Quality of life, sense of coherence and occupational balance one year after an occupational therapy intervention for people with depression and anxiety disorders. Work2023; 76: 561–568.
16.
FigueredoJMGarcia-AelCGragnanoA, et al.Well-being at work after return to work (RTW): a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 7490.
17.
HoogervorstLAHartMJSimpsonPM, et al.Outcomes of severe lower limb injury with mangled extremity severity score ≥ 7. Bone Jt J2021; 103: 769–774.
18.
McMinnKRThomasEVMartinKR, et al.Psychological morbidity and functional impairment following traumatic pelvic injury. Injury2020; 51: 978–983.
19.
PetersMDJGodfreyCMcInerneyP, et al.Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols. JBI Evid Synth2022; 20: 953–968.
20.
PetersMDJMarnieCTriccoAC, et al.Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth2020; 18: 2119–2126.
21.
OuzzaniMHammadyHFedorowiczZ, et al.Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev2016; 5: 210.
BelangeroWDFogagnoloFKojimaKE, et al.Isolated open tibial shaft fracture: a seven-hospital, prospective observational study in two Latin America countries. Rev Col Bras Cir2022; 49: e20223301.
24.
FioravantiMMamanPCurvaleG, et al.Amputation versus conservative treatment in severe open lower-limb fracture: a functional and quality-of-life study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2018; 104: 277–281.
25.
FrisvollCClarke-JenssenJMadsenJE, et al.Long-term outcomes after high-energy open tibial fractures: is a salvaged limb superior to prosthesis in terms of physical function and quality of life?Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2019; 29: 899–906.
26.
LevyJFReiderLScharfsteinDO, et al.The 1-year economic impact of work productivity loss following severe lower extremity trauma. J Bone Jt Surg2022; 104: 586–593.
27.
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC). Outcomes following severe distal tibial, ankle, and/or mid/hindfoot trauma: comparison of limb salvage and transtibial amputation (OUTLET). JBJS2021; 103: 1588–1597.
28.
SethuramanASDevendraARajasekaranRB, et al.Is lower limb salvage worthwhile after severe open tibial fractures in a developing country? An analysis of surgical outcomes, quality of life and cost implications. Injury2021; 52: 996–1001.
29.
ApratoAJoerisATostoF, et al.Are work return and leaves of absence after acetabular fractures predictable? : a retrospective study of 108 patients. Musculoskelet Surg2017; 101: 31–35.
30.
GabbeBJHofsteeDJEsserM, et al.Functional and return to work outcomes following major trauma involving severe pelvic ring fracture. ANZ J Surg2015; 85: 749–754.
31.
SmithJJAgelJSwiontkowskiMF, et al.Functional outcome of bilateral limb threatening: lower extremity injuries at two years postinjury. J Orthop Trauma2005; 19: 249–253.
32.
KuhlmanMBLohseNSørensenAM, et al.Impact of the severity of trauma on early retirement. Injury2014; 45: 618–623.
33.
LarsenPGoethgenCBRasmussenS, et al.One-year development of QOL following orthopaedic polytrauma: a prospective observational cohort study of 53 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2016; 136: 1539–1546.
34.
HadfieldJNOmogbehinTSBrookesC, et al.The open-fracture patient evaluation nationwide (OPEN) study. Bone & Joint Open2022; 3: 746–752.
35.
SchadeATKhatriCNwankwoH, et al.The economic burden of open tibia fractures: a systematic review. Injury2021; 52: 1251–1259.
36.
LevyML. The national review of asthma deaths: what did we learn and what needs to change?Breathe2015; 11: 14–24.
37.
CechARieussecCKerschbaumerG, et al.Complications and outcomes in 69 consecutive patients with floating hip. Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res2021; 107: 102998.
38.
PallisterIHandleyGJMaggsS, et al.Measuring recovery after open lower limb fractures: combined objective functional tests and global perceived recovery outperform narrower metrics and a standard generic patient reported outcome measure. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2021; 22: 539.
39.
MonteleoneASFeltriPMolinaMN, et al.Quality of life from return to work and sports activities to sexual dysfunction after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2023; 143: 1491–1497.
40.
LindahlMJunejaH. I'll be back – predictive validity of adults’ expectations for recovery after fractures - A longitudinal observational study. Injury2023; 54: 1553–1562.
41.
ChenKHynesKKDirschlD, et al.Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder following upper versus lower extremity fractures. Injury2024; 55: 111242.
42.
ScottSBrameierDTTryggedssonI, et al.Prevalence, resources, provider insights, and outcomes: a review of patient mental health in orthopaedic trauma. J Orthop Surg Res2024; 19: 538.
43.
WeinermanJVazquezASchurhoffN, et al.The impacts of anxiety and depression on outcomes in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a narrative review. Annal Med Surg2023; 85: 5523–5527.
44.
StarikTHuberMZeiligG, et al.Employment barriers questionnaire: development and determination of its reliability and validity. Work2024; 79: 1255–1267.
45.
LongtinCTousignant-LaflammeYCoutuMF. A logic model for a self-management program designed to help workers with persistent and disabling low back pain stay at work. Work2020; 67: 395–406.
46.
DemouEBrownJSanatiK, et al.A novel approach to early sickness absence management: the EASY (early access to support for you) way. Work2015; 53: 597–608.
