Self-employment is a prevalent employment or job placement option for persons with disabilities in developing countries like those in Africa.
Objective
This research explored perceptions of self-employment barriers, facilitators and solutions among persons with disabilities in a rural South African setting.
Methods
This is a qualitative, exploratory, descriptive study design. Purposive sampling was used to recruit ten persons with disabilities in microenterprises in a rural setting of KwaZulu Natal. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted using a piloted question guide in their preferred language. Thematic data analysis was done using the hybrid inductive and deductive approaches. Data was managed using the NVIVO software.
Results
Out of ten self-employed participants, nine were male, and one was female. None of the participants had passed grade 12 (a prerequisite for basic jobs and entry into tertiary education), and two had no education. Two themes emerged. Theme one: Participants identified personal, societal and role players related barriers and facilitators in self-employment. Persons with disabilities reported challenges in self-employment. Despite the challenges, they remained resolute in leveraging residual function (functional upper limbs and cognitive abilities) to operate their microenterprise and use their time constructively. Theme two: Persons with disabilities proposed assistance with setting up self-employment in microenterprises as a solution – “What I would need most from a professional…” The proposed solutions involved community-based outreach where key role players engage directly with persons with disabilities in their communities to identify and address their needs.
Conclusions
Persons with disabilities in rural KwaZulu Natal seek tailored and transparent services to address barriers to self-employment and ensure the sustainability of their microenterprise.
MashileBJ. Mapulana: The nation buried alive. Africa Chuto Books. ISBN: 0620694912, 9780620694919. Africa Chuto Books, 2016.
2.
JochenSA. Divided by the Word: Colonial encounters and the remaking of Zulu and Xhosa identities, 2022.
3.
ChenMA. The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies, 2012.
4.
PerryG. Informality: Exit and exclusion. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications, 2007.
5.
FourieF. The South African informal sector: Creating jobs, reducing poverty. Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) Press, 2018.
6.
International Labour Organization. Women and men in the informal economy: A statistical picture. Genève. 3rd ed. 2018.
7.
The Economist. Measuring India’s economy, 2019.
8.
Anuwa-AmarhET. Understanding the urban informal economy in Ghana: A survey report. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Ghana, 2015.
9.
GamieldienFvan NiekerkL. Street vending in South Africa: an entrepreneurial occupation. S Afr J Occup Ther2017; 47: 24–29.
10.
AlcockGG. Kasinomic revolution: The rise of African informal economies. Tracey McDonald Publishers, 2018.
11.
City of Johannesburg. The rise and rise of hawking in the city, in Joburg, my City, our Future: Growth and Development Strategy 20402007, n.d.
12.
MahadeaDKhumaloS. Understanding the internal and external constraints to growth of microenterprise entrepreneurship in a South African provincial context: a case of Mpumalanga-Mkhondo. J Dev Entrep2020; 25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946720500132
13.
ShakespeareTMugeereANyarikiE,et al.Success in Africa: people with disabilities share their stories. Afr J Disabil2019; 8. doi:10/10.4102/ajod
14.
MaziririETMadingaWLoseT. Entrepreneurial barriers that are confronted by entrepreneurs living with physical disabilities: a thematic analysis. J Econ Behav Stud2017; 9: 27–45.
15.
SteinbergJ. Crime prevention goes abroad: policy transfer and policing in post-apartheid South Africa. Theor Criminol2011; 15: 349–364.
16.
ViririPMakurumidzeS. Engagement of disabled people in Entrepreneurship Programmes in Zimbabwe. J Small Bus Entrep Dev2014; 2.
17.
HerringtonMKewJKewP,et al.Tracking entrepreneurship in South Africa: A GEM perspective. Graduate School of Business, University of Cape Town South Africa, 2010.
18.
SoekerMSDe JonghJCDiedericksA, et al.The experiences and perceptions of persons with disabilities regarding work skills development in sheltered and protective workshops. Work2018; 59: 303–314.
19.
LorenzoTvan NiekerkLMdlokoloP. Economic empowerment and black disabled enterpreneurs: negotiating partnership in Cape Town, South Africa. Disabil Rehabil2007; 29: 429–436.
20.
Van NiekerkLLorenzoTMdlokoloP. Understanding partnerships in developing disabled entrepreneurs through participatory action research. Disabil Rehabil2006; 28: 323–331.
21.
NgcukaitobiT. The land is ours: South Africa’s first black lawyers and the birth of constitutionalism. Penguin Books, an imprint of Penguin Random House, 2018.
22.
AdebajoA. The curse of Berlin: Africa after the cold. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2010.
23.
Mpofu-WalshS. The new apartheid. Cape Town: Tafelberg, 2021.
24.
MorwaneREDadaSBornmanJ. Barriers to and facilitators of employment of persons with disabilities in low- and middle income countries: a scoping review. Afr J Disabil2021; 10: 1–12.
25.
ChimaraMVan NiekerkLvan BiljonHM. Scoping review exploring vocational rehabilitation interventions for mental health service users with chronic mental illness in low-income to upper-middle-income countries. BMJ Open2022; 12: e059211.
26.
MalhotraSKaurTJainK, et al.Inclusive entrepreneurship ecosystem for PwDs: a reflection on SDGs. Int J Manpow2024; 46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2024-0042
27.
SodhiSDwivediAK. Differently abled entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review on fifty years of research—exploring thoughts and debate with reference to entrepreneurship. J Entrep2024; 33: 183–220.
28.
AshleyDGrafNM. The process and experiences of self-employment among people with disabilities: a qualitative study. Rehabil Couns Bull2018; 61: 90–100.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care2007; 19: 349–357.
31.
HenninkMMKaiserBNMarconiVC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough?Qual Health Res2017; 27: 591–608.
32.
PretoriusM. Defining business decline, failure and turnaround: a content analysis. South Afr J Entrep Small Bus Manag2009; 2: 1–16.
33.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods2006; 5: 80–92.
34.
KochT. Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail. J Adv Nurs1994; 19: 976–986.
35.
AroniRGoemanDStewartK, et al.Concepts of rigour: When methodological, clinical and ethical issues intersect. Association for Qualitative Research Conference, Melbourne, 1999.
36.
SandelowskiM. “To be of use”: enhancing the utility of qualitative research. Nurs Outlook1997; 45: 125–132.
37.
WasikeELikokoS. Effect of entrepreneurship education on growth of enterprises owned by entrepreneurs with disabilities in Bungoma County, Kenya. Int J Sci Res2013; 4: 1079–1082.
38.
AsareRAkuffobeaMQuayeW,et al.Characteristics of micro, small and medium enterprises in Ghana: gender and implications for economic growth. Afr J Sci Technol Innov Dev2015; 7: 26–35.
39.
EkelundJJohanssonEJärvelinMR,et al.Self-employment and risk aversion - evidence from psychological test data. Labour Econ2005; 12: 649–659.
40.
NoorderhavenNThurikRWennekersS,et al.The role of dissatisfaction and per capita income in explaining self–employment across 15 European countries. Entrep Theory Pract2004; 28: 447–466.
41.
International Labour Organisation. Sub-regional Office for East Asia. Replicating success tool kit. ILO, 2009.
42.
MakuyanaTDubeK. Perceptions of disabled people on public transport as an enabler of inclusive domestic tourism in South Africa. Int J Sci Res2023; 12.
43.
American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. 4th ed.American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2020. doi:10.5014/ajot.2020.74S2001.
44.
JacobUSPillayJAdeoyeOE,et al.Barriers to employment of people with intellectual disability. Work2023; 74: 207–218.
45.
MpawinezaLJammaersE. The employment challenges of persons with disabilities in Africa. Dissertation for the Master of Science in Management, 2023.
46.
BlanckPDSandlerLASchmelingJL,et al.The emerging workforce of entrepreneurs with disabilities: preliminary study of entrepreneurship in Iowa. Iowa L Rev1999; 85: 1583.
47.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4430.0 disability, ageing and carers 2012, http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/2ADDDF9F0652A0A2CA257C21000D81D2?opendocument (2013, accessed 21 June 2023).
48.
PagánR. Self-employment among people with disabilities: evidence for Europe. Disabil Soc2009; 24: 217–229.
49.
DanielO. Barriers and facilitators to self-employment of persons with disabilities in Gulu district, Uganda By, 2019.
50.
NalediTBarronPSchneiderH. Primary health care in SA since 1994 and implications of the new vision for PHC re-engineering. S Afr Health Rev2011; 2011: 17–28.
51.
MasekoLMyezwaHBenjamin-DamonsN, et al.Service guidelines, models, and protocols for integrating rehabilitation services in primary healthcare in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil2023; 46: 1–14.
52.
NedLTiwariRBuchananH, et al.Changing demographic trends among South African occupational therapists: 2002 to 2018. Hum Resour Health2020; 18: 1–12.
53.
CrammJMPaauweMFinkenflügelH. Facilitators and hindrances in the experiences of Ugandans with and without disabilities when seeking access to microcredit schemes. Disabil Rehabil2012; 34: 2166–2176.
54.
FantaABMutsonziwaKBerkowitzB, et al.Small business performance: Does access to finance matter? Evidence from SADC using Fin Scope surveys, 2017.
55.
CasteleijnD. Using measurement principles to confirm the levels of creative ability as described in the Vona du Toit Model of Creative Ability. S Afr J Occup Ther2014; 44: 14–19.
56.
de WittP. Creative ability: a model for individual and group occupational therapy for clients with psychosocial dysfunction. Occup Ther Psychiatry Mental Health2014: 3–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118913536.ch1
57.
MonarengLLFranzsenDCasteleijnDC,et al.The application of the Vona du Toit Model of Creative Ability to self-employment in South African informal microenterprises. S Afr J Occup Ther2021; 51: 74–81.
Abimanyi-OchomJMannanH. Uganda’s disability journey: progress and challenges: community paper. Afr J Disabil2014; 3: –6.
60.
XeshaDIwuCGSlabbertA. Business relationships as a driver of success for small, medium, and micro enterprises (SMMEs) in South Africa. J Econ2014; 5: 37–43.
61.
WHO. CBR Matrix 2014:2014.
62.
Van NiekerkL. Participation in work: a human rights issue for people with psychiatric disabilities. S Afr J Occup Ther2008; 38: 9–15.
63.
South African Government. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Act No. 108 of 1996, 1996.
64.
TerziL. The social model of disability: a philosophical critique. J Appl Philos2004; 21: 141–157.
65.
PefileNMothabengJNaidooS. A multidisciplinary model to guide employment outcomes among people living with spinal cord injuries in South Africa: a mixed methods study protocol. JMIR Res Protoc2016; 5: e238.
66.
American Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
67.
CharmanAJEPetersenLMPiperLE, et al.Small area census approach to measure the township informal economy in South Africa. J Mix Methods Res2017; 11: 36–58.
