The modern work from home (WFH) arrangement presents a unique paradox, offering workers the freedom to customize their workspace while simultaneously exposing them to potential negative effects from the blending of home and work domains, particularly through sensory disturbances from nonwork sources.
Objective:
We examine the relationships between spatial variables within home workspaces (home workspace size, location, and depth) and employees’ self-reported sensory (visual, auditory, olfactory) experiences from the home domain. We explore how these sensory experiences relate to two key negative worker outcomes and consider how these outcomes may relate to an individual's future intention to work from home. Additionally, we integrate boundary theory to explain the interplay between home and work domains.
Methods:
199 administrative staff workers were recruited through email solicitations to participate in an online survey. After giving informed consent, participants provided demographic, workspace-related, and attitudinal data. Data was gathered between August and September 2022.
Results:
Results show that individuals working in their kitchen and open areas of the home reported more visual disturbances than individuals working in enclosed areas. Larger workplaces were also associated with fewer auditory disturbances. In turn, visual and auditory disturbances were associated with increased stress and home-to-work boundary violations, which had a negative relationship with future work-from-home intentions.
Conclusions:
The findings highlight the importance of optimizing the spatial configuration of home workspaces to minimize the impact of sensory disturbances on stress and work-home boundaries, thereby supporting a more sustainable work-from-home experience.
VartiainenM. Telework and remote work. In: Josė Maria Peiro. Oxford research encyclopedia of psychologyOxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2021, pp.1–30.
2.
FelsteadAHensekeG. Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being, and work-life balance. New Technol Work Employ2017; 32: 195–212.
3.
MellnerCPetersPDragtMJ, et al.Predicting work-life conflict: types and levels of enacted and preferred work-nonwork boundary (in) congruence and perceived boundary control. Front Psychol2021; 12: 772537.
4.
GreenhausJHPowellGN. When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Acad Manag Rev2006; 31: 72–92.
5.
HackneyAYungMSomasundramKG, et al.Working in the digital economy: a systematic review of the impact of work from home arrangements on personal and organizational performance and productivity. PLoS ONE2022; 17: e0274728.
6.
NeufeldDJFangY. Individual, social, and situational determinants of telecommuter productivity. Inf Manage2005; 42: 1037–1049.
7.
MontreuilSLippelK. Telework and occupational health: a Quebec empirical study and regulatory implications. Safety Sci2003; 41: 339–358.
8.
MargaritiEKAliRBenthem de GraveR, et al.Understanding the experiences of remote workers: opportunities for ambient workspaces at home. Front Comput Sci2021; 3: 1–23.
9.
XiaoYBecerik-GerberBLucasG, et al.Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. J Occup Environ Med2021; 63: 181–190.
10.
BergefurtLAppel-MeulenbroekRArentzeT. How physical home workspace characteristics affect mental health: a systematic scoping review. Work2023; 76: 489–506.
11.
BergefurtLAppel-MeulenbroekRMarisC, et al.The influence of distractions of the home-work environment on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ergonomics2023; 66: 16–33.
12.
BoegheimBAppel-MeulenbroekRYangD, et al.Indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in the home workplace in relation to mental well-being. Facilities2022; 40: 125–140.
13.
AllenTDGoldenTDShockleyKM. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychol Sci Public Interest2015; 16: 40–68.
14.
OjalaSNättiJAnttilaT. Informal overtime at home instead of telework: increase in negative work-family interface. Int J Sociol Soc Policy2014; 34: 69–87.
15.
SolísMS. Telework: conditions that have a positive and negative impact on the work-family conflict. Acad Rev Latinoam de Adm2016; 29: 435–449.
16.
AshforthBEKreinerGEFugateM. All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad Manage Rev2000; 25: 472–491.
17.
KreinerGE. Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: a person-environment fit perspective. J Organ Behav2006; 27: 485–507.
AllenTDMerloKLawrenceRC, et al.Boundary management and work-nonwork balance while working from home. Appl Psychol2021; 70: 60–84.
20.
SullivanCLewisS. Work at home and the work—family interface. In: JonesFBurkeRJWestmanM (eds) Work-life balance. London: Psychology Press, 2013, pp.143–162.
21.
BasileKABeauregardTA. Strategies for successful telework: how effective employees manage work/home boundaries. Strategic HR Rev2016; 15: 106–111.
22.
HaunVCRemmelCHaunS. Boundary management and recovery when working from home: the moderating roles of segmentation preference and availability demands. Ger J Hum Resour Manage2022; 36: 270–299.
23.
BergefurtLWeijs-PerréeMAppel-MeulenbroekR, et al.Satisfaction with activity-support and physical home-workspace characteristics in relation to mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Environ Psychol2022; 81: 101826.
24.
AwadaMLucasGBecerik-GerberB, et al.Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on office worker productivity and work experience. Work2021; 69: 1171–1189.
25.
JanneckMJentSWeberP, et al.Ergonomics to go: designing the mobile workspace. Int J Hum–Comput Interaction2018; 34: 1052–1062.
26.
RobelskiSKellerHHarthV, et al.Coworking spaces: the better home office? A psychosocial and health-related perspective on an emerging work environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16: 2379.
MarkGGudithDKlockeU. The cost of interrupted work: more speed and stress. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2008 Apr 6, pp.107–110.
29.
JahnckeHHyggeSHalinN, et al.Open-plan office noise: cognitive performance and restoration. J Environ Psychol2011; 31: 373–382.
30.
KossekEELautschBAEatonSC. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work–family effectiveness. J Vocat Behav2006; 68: 347–367.
31.
SchmiederRASmithCS. Moderating effects of social support in shiftworking and non-shiftworking nurses. Work Stress1996; 10: 128–140.
32.
SpenceC. Senses of place: architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cogn Res Princ Implic2020; 5: 46.
33.
HutmacherF. Why is there so much more research on vision than on any other sensory modality?Front Psychol2019; 10: 481030.
34.
ForsterSSpenceC. “What smell?” temporarily loading visual attention induces a prolonged loss of olfactory awareness. Psychol Sci2018; 29: 1642–1652.
35.
BernsteinETurbanS. The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaboration. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci2018; 373: 1–8.
36.
De CroonESluiterJKuijerPP, et al.The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics2005; 48: 119–134.
37.
PuglisiGEDi BlasioSShtrepiL, et al.Remote working in the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a questionnaire on the perceived noise annoyance. Front Built Environ2021; 7: 1–19.
38.
VischerJ. Space meets status: designing workplace performance. London: Routledge, 2005.
39.
AndargieMSTouchieMO’BrienW. Case study: a survey of perceived noise in Canadian multi-unit residential buildings to study long-term implications for widespread teleworking. Build Acoust2021; 28: 443–460.
40.
SpenceC. Using ambient scent to enhance well-being in the multisensory built environment. Front Psychol2020; 11: 598859.
41.
McCooeyC.Scenting success, (p. 1). The Financial Times, February 3rd (House & Home). 2008.
42.
SpenceC.The Ici Report on the Secret of the Senses. The Communication Group. 2002.
43.
SpenceC. Sensehacking: How to use the power of your senses for happier, healthier living. Oxford, UK: Penguin UK, 2021.
44.
HoseyL. Scent and the city. The New York Times. 2013 Oct 25; 25.
45.
WarmJSDemberWNParasuramanR. Effects of olfactory stimulation on performance and stress. J Soc Cosmet Chem1991; 42: 199–210.
46.
EmrathP. National Association of Home Builders. Spaces in new homes. Washington, DC: NAHB, 2013.
47.
RechaviTB. A room for living: private and public aspects in the experience of the living room. J Environ Psychol2009; 29: 133–143.
48.
SeddighABerntsonEJönssonF, et al.The effect of noise absorption variation in open-plan offices: a field study with a cross-over design. J Environ Psychol2015; 44: 34–44.
49.
YadavMKimJCabreraD, et al.Auditory distraction in open-plan office environments: the effect of multi-talker acoustics. Appl Acoust2017; 126: 68–80.
50.
BafnaS. Space syntax: a brief Introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environ Behav2003; 35: 17–29.
51.
ChambersECBafnaSMachryH. The association between apartment layout and depressive symptomology among hispanic/latino residents in low-income housing: the AHOME study. J Urban Health2018; 95: 51–60.
52.
ChoudharyRBafnaSHeoY, et al.A predictive model for computing the influence of space layouts on nurses’ movement in hospital units. J Build Perform Simul2010; 3: 171–184.
53.
GrierKC. Culture and comfort: Parlor making in America, 1850–1930. (Volumes I and II) [dissertation]. Delaware (US): University of Delaware,1988
54.
MarteauTMBekkerH. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the spielberger state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol1992; 31: 301–306.
55.
HunterEMClarkMACarlsonDS. Violating work-family boundaries: reactions to interruptions at work and home. J Manage2019; 45: 1284–1308.
56.
MaertzCPJrBoyarSL. Work-family conflict, enrichment, and balance under “levels” and “episodes” approaches. J Manage2011; 37: 68–98.
57.
BaileyNBKurlandNB. The advantages and challenges of working here, there, anywhere, and anytime. Organ Dyn1999; 28: 53–68.
58.
HillEJMillerBCWeinerSP, et al.Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Pers Psychol1998; 51: 667–683.
59.
VassieKRichardsonM. Effect of self-adjustable masking noise on open-plan office worker’s concentration task performance and attitudes. Appl Acoust2017; 119: 119–127.
60.
KermanKKorunkaCTementS. Work and home boundary violations during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of segmentation preferences and unfinished tasks. Appl Psychol2021; 71: 784–806.
61.
SchlittmeierSJHellbrückJThadenR, et al.The impact of background speech varying in intelligibility: effects on cognitive performance and perceived disturbance. Ergonomics2008; 51: 719–736.
62.
StampsAE. Atmospheric permeability and perceived enclosure. Environ Behav2012; 44: 427–446.
63.
AndersonAJKaplanSAVegaRP. The impact of telework on emotional experience: when and for whom does telework improve daily affective well-being?Eur J Work Organ Psychol2015; 24: 882–897.
64.
BeasleyDELomo-DavidESeubertVR. Telework and gender: implications for the management of information technology professionals. Ind Manag Data Syst2001; 101: 477–482.
65.
BertiMSimpsonAVCleggSR. Making a place out of space: the social imaginaries and realities of a business school as a designed space. Manag Learn2018; 49: 168–186.
66.
BaileyDEKurlandNB. A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. J Organ Behav: Int J Ind Occup Organ Psychol Behav2002; 23: 383–400.
67.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2023. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm
68.
KimJde DearRCandidoC, et al.Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Build Environ2013; 70: 245–256.
69.
KoWHSchiavonSZhangH, et al.The impact of a view from a window on thermal comfort, emotion, and cognitive performance. Build Environ2020; 175: 106779.
70.
WütschertMSRomano-PereiraDSuterL, et al.A systematic review of working conditions and occupational health in home office. Work2022; 72: 839–852.
71.
Appel-MeulenbroekRStepsSWenmaekersR, et al.Coping strategies and perceived productivity in open-plan offices with noise problems. J Manag Psychol2020; 36: 400–414.
