Disproportionately increased workload is one of the main reasons affecting work performance. Healthcare workers who got infected by COVID-19 were further affected mentally and physically which had an impact on their work performance.
Objective
In this study, we aimed to show whether work performance is affected even in people with mild Covid 19 disease or whether it is a part of Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS).
Methods
Thirty healthcare workers in a tertiary hospital had COVID-19 one month ago and gender and age matched 30 healthy workers without a history of COVID-19 (control group) was enrolled between January 2021 and March 2021. Work performance was assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Participants performed 1-min sit-to-stand test (1MSTS), 5 times sit-to-stand test (5TSTS), and 6-min walk test (6MWT).
Results
All participants in the COVID-19 group had a mild (non-hospitalized) form of the disease. 23 patients had ongoing symptoms 4–7 weeks after the initial symptoms of COVID-19 (fatigue/malaise (n = 9), myalgia/arthralgia (n = 7), cough (n = 7), loss of smell/taste (n = 5), headache (n = 5), dyspnea (n = 4), and diarrhea (n = 1). The increase in systolic blood pressure after 6MWT was higher in the COVID group (p = 0.018).
Conclusion
The functional status and work performance in healthcare workers with COVID-19 infection were negatively affected in the first month even if the disease severity was mild. It is important to prevent both acute and long-term physical and mental complications of the disease and to ensure that these strategies improve the functional status and work performance of healthcare professionals.
GoërtzYMJVan HerckMDelbressineJM, et al.Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: the post-COVID-19 syndrome?ERJ Open Res2020; 6: 00542–02020.
2.
GreenhalghTKnightMA'CourtC, et al.Management of post-acute COVID-19 in primary care. BMJ2020; 370: m3026.
3.
SudreCHMurrayBVarsavskyT, et al.Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med2021; 27: 626–631.
4.
Van Den BorstBPetersJBBrinkM, et al.Comprehensive health assessment 3 months after recovery from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clin Infect Dis2021; 73: e1089–e1e98.
5.
WongAWShahASJohnstonJC, et al.Patient-reported outcome measures after COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Eur Respir J2020; 56: 2003276.
6.
ShahWHillmanTPlayfordED,et al.Managing the long term effects of COVID-19: summary of NICE, SIGN, and RCGP rapid guideline. bmj2021; 372: n136.
7.
BelliSBalbiBPrinceI, et al.Low physical functioning and impaired performance of activities of daily life in COVID-19 patients who survived hospitalisation. Eur Respir J2020; 56: 2002096.
8.
StavemKGhanimaWOlsenMK, et al.Persistent symptoms 1.5–6 months after COVID-19 in non-hospitalised subjects: a population-based cohort study. Thorax2021; 76: 405–407.
9.
D'CruzRFWallerMDPerrinF, et al.Chest radiography is a poor predictor of respiratory symptoms and functional impairment in survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia. ERJ Open Res2021; 7: 00655-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00655-2020.
10.
BestallJCPaulEAGarrodR, et al.Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax1999; 54: 581–586.
11.
UlusoyMSahinNErkmenH. Turkish version of the beck anxiety inventory: psychometric properties. J Cogn Psychother1998; 12: 163–172.
12.
HisliN. Beck depresyon envanterinin geçerliği üzerine bir çalışma [validity study of the beck depression inventory] [Turkish]. Turk J Psychol1988; 6: 118–122.
13.
Ozyemisci-TaskiranOBaturEBYukselS, et al.Validity and reliability of fatigue severity scale in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil2019; 26: 122–127.
14.
AtanTOzyemisci TaskiranOBora TokcaerA, et al.Effects of different percentages of body weight-supported treadmill training in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Turk J Med Sci2019; 49: 999–1007.
15.
WareJJr.KosinskiMKellerSD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care1996; 34: 220–233.
16.
TuranZTopalogluMOzyemisci TaskiranO. Medical research council-sumscore: a tool for evaluating muscle weakness in patients with post-intensive care syndrome. Crit Care2020; 24: 562.
17.
BeaudartCMcCloskeyEBruyereO, et al.Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management. BMC Geriatr2016; 16: 170.
18.
BohannonRW. Reference values for the five-repetition sit-to-stand test: a descriptive meta-analysis of data from elders. Percept Mot Skills2006; 103: 215–222.
19.
GoldbergAChavisMWatkinsJ,et al.The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging Clin Exp Res2012; 24: 339–344.
20.
JonesSEKonSSCanavanJL, et al.The five-repetition sit-to-stand test as a functional outcome measure in COPD. Thorax2013; 68: 1015–1020.
21.
StrassmannASteurer-SteyCLanaKD, et al.Population-based reference values for the 1-min sit-to-stand test. Int J Public Health2013; 58: 949–953.
22.
HollandAESpruitMATroostersT, et al.An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J2014; 44: 1428–1446.
23.
EnrightPL. The six-minute walk test. Respir Care2003; 48: 783–785.
24.
BohannonRWCrouchR. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-min walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract2017; 23: 377–381.
25.
LaiJMaSWangY, et al.Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open2020; 3: e203976.
26.
SugiyamaAMiwataKKitaharaY, et al.Long COVID occurrence in COVID-19 survivors. Sci Rep2022; 12: 6039.
27.
BlombergBMohnKGBrokstadKA, et al.Long COVID in a prospective cohort of home-isolated patients. Nat Med2021; 27: 1607–1613.
28.
PetersenMSKristiansenMFHanussonKD, et al.Long COVID in the Faroe Islands: a longitudinal study among nonhospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis2021; 73: e4058–e4e63.
29.
LipSMcCallumLDellesC, et al.Rationale and Design for the LOnger-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 INfection on blood Vessels And blood pRessure (LOCHINVAR): an observational phenotyping study. Open Heart2022; 9: e002057.
30.
Della MonicaAFerraraPDal MasF, et al.The impact of COVID-19 healthcare emergency on the psychological well-being of health professionals: a review of literature. Ann Ig2022; 34: 27–44.
31.
BocciaSRicciardiWIoannidisJPA. What other countries can learn from Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Intern Med2020; 180: 927–928.
32.
TanBYQChewNWSLeeGKH, et al.Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care workers in Singapore. Ann Intern Med2020; 173: 317–320.
33.
ZhangCYangLLiuS, et al.Survey of insomnia and related social psychological factors among medical staff involved in the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak. Front Psychiatry2020; 11: 306.
34.
Salazar de PabloGVaquerizo-SerranoJCatalanA, et al.Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord2020; 275: 48–57.
35.
DelbressineJMMachadoFVCGoertzYMJ, et al.The Impact of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome on Self-Reported Physical Activity. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 6017.
36.
WakamGKMontgomeryJRBiesterveldBE,et al.Not dying alone - modern compassionate care in the COVID-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med2020; 382: e88.
37.
White-MeansSIWarrenCLOsmaniAR. The organizational impact of presenteeism among key healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Black Polit Econ2022; 49: 20–40.
38.
ChiricoFMagnavitaN. COVID-19 infection in Italy: an occupational injury. S Afr Med J2020; 110: 12944.
39.
GodderisLBooneABakusicJ. COVID-19: a new work-related disease threatening healthcare workers. Occup Med (Lond)2020; 70: 315–316.
40.
GiorgiGLeccaLIAlessioF, et al.COVID-19-related mental health effects in the workplace: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 7857.
