The ageing of the working population and the sustainability of work throughout the life cycle represent a significant challenge for many European countries, particularly in relation to the implementation of legislation raising the retirement age.
Objective
The objective of this study was to examine the physical, psychological and social risk and protective factors that influence the sustainability of work during the ageing process.
Methods
Twenty-five interviews were conducted, followed by a reflexive thematic analysis, with the aim of gathering the perspectives of a company's employees regarding factors related to ageing in the workplace.
Results
Two key themes emerged from the analysis, encapsulating the participants’ different perceptions of risk and protective factors. Among the physical risk factors were those related to stress caused by job characteristics, which affect physical health. In addition, the study identified continuous shift work as a significant risk factor, which affects both physical health and the ability to reconcile work and family life. In addition, the responsibility of caring for dependent elderly family members and childcare responsibilities were highlighted as social factors that may affect employees’ well-being.
Conclusions
The study provides a useful basis for the implementation of company interventions to improve the work sustainability of older employees, with possible applications in other similar companies.
IlmarinenJTuomiKKlockarsM. Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health1997; 23: 49–57.
2.
NilssonK. Conceptualisation of ageing in relation to factors of importance for extending working life-a review. Scand J Public Health2016; 44: 490–505.
3.
Varianou-MikellidouCBoustrasGDimopoulosC, et al.Occupational health and safety management in the context of an ageing workforce. Saf Sci2019; 116: 231–244.
CostaG. Some considerations about aging, shift work and work ability. Int Congr Ser2005; 1280: 67–72.
9.
CostaGDi MiliaL. Aging and shift work: a complex problem to face. Chronobiol Int2008; 25: 165–181.
10.
CostaGSartoriS. Ageing, working hours and work ability. Ergonomics2007; 50: 1914–1930.
11.
HulseggeGvan MechelenWProperKI, et al.Shift work, and burnout and distress among 7798 blue-collar workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2020; 93: 955–963.
12.
SavinainenMNygårdCHIlmarinenJ. A 16-year follow-up study of physical capacity in relation to perceived workload among ageing employees. Ergonomics2004; 47: 1087–1102.
13.
NygårdCHLuopajärviTSuurnäkkiT,et al.Muscle strength and muscle endurance of middle-aged women and men associated to type, duration and intensity of muscular load at work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health1988; 60: 291–297.
14.
de ZwartBCHFrings-DresenMHWvan DijkFJH. Physical workload and the ageing worker: a review of the literature. Int Arch Occup Environ Health1996; 68: 1–12.
15.
CaponecchiaCComanRLGopaldasaniV, et al.Musculoskeletal disorders in aged care workers: a systematic review of contributing factors and interventions. Int J Nurs Stud2020; 110: 103715.
16.
AlaviniaSMMolenaarDBurdorfA. Productivity loss in the workforce: associations with health, work demands, and individual characteristics. Am J Ind Med2009; 52: 49–56.
17.
StawBMSuttonRIPelledLH. Employee positive emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace. Organ Sci1994; 5: 51–71.
18.
van den HeuvelSGGeuskensGAHooftmanWE, et al.Productivity loss at work; health-related and work-related factors. J Occup Rehabil2010; 20: 331–339.
19.
van den BergTIJEldersLAMde ZwartBCH,et al.The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med2009; 66: 211–220.
20.
van den BergTIRobroekSJPlatJF, et al.The importance of job control for workers with decreased work ability to remain productive at work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2011; 84: 705–712.
21.
de VriesHJBrouwerSGroothoffJW, et al.Staying at work with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative study of workers’ experiences. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2011; 12: 26.
22.
BakkerABDemeroutiE. The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol2007; 22: 309–328.
23.
BanduraA. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health1998; 13: 623–649.
24.
SemenzaRBoccardoGSartiS. So far, so similar? Labour market feminization in Italy and Chile. Soc Indic Res2021; 154: 917–942.
25.
TorreM. Women in blue: structural and individual determinants of sex segregation in blue-collar occupations. Gend Soc2019; 33: 410–438.
26.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
27.
BraunVClarkeV. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual Psychol2022; 9: 3–26.
28.
DemeroutiEBakkerABNachreinerF,et al.The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol2001; 86: 499–512.
29.
BakkerABDemeroutiEde BoerE,et al.Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. J Vocat Behav2003; 62: 341–356.
30.
BakkerABDemeroutiETarisTW, et al.A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations. Int J Stress Manag2003; 10: 16–38.
31.
Parent-LamarcheAMarchandA. Well-being at work from a multilevel perspective: what is the role of personality traits?Int J Workplace Health Manag2021; 14: 333–352.
32.
Parent-ThirionAVermeylenGHoutenV, et al.Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Eurofound, Publications Office of the European Union; 2012.
33.
KahnRLWolfeDMSnoekJD. Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley, 1964.
34.
PleckJH. The work-family role system. Soc Probl1977; 24: 417–427.
35.
ChristianMSGarzaASSlaughterJE. Work engagement: a quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Pers Psychol2011; 64: 89–136.
36.
OldhamGRCummingsA. Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Acad Manage J1996; 39: 607–634.
37.
RaffertyAEGriffinMA. Dimensions of transformational leadership: conceptual and empirical extensions. Leadersh Q2004; 15: 329–354.
38.
LiaoHJoshiAChuangA. Sticking out like a sore thumb: employee dissimilarity and deviance at work. Pers Psychol2004; 57: 969–1000.
39.
MartinJK. Unrewarding work, coworker support, and job satisfaction: a test of the buffering hypothesis. Work Occup2000; 27: 223–243.
40.
ParrisMA. Work teams: perceptions of a ready-made support system?Employ Respons Rights J2003; 15: 71–83.
41.
StinglhamberFVandenbergheC. Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study. J Organ Behav2003; 24: 251–270.
42.
LoukidouLLoan-ClarkeJDanielsK. Boredom in the workplace: more than monotonous tasks. Int J Manag Rev2009; 11: 381–405.
43.
WarrP. Well-being and the workplace. In: KahnemanDSchwarzEDN (eds) Well-Being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1999, pp.392–412.
44.
LindwallMGerberMJonsdottirIH, et al.The relationships of change in physical activity with change in depression, anxiety, and burnout: a longitudinal study of Swedish healthcare workers. Health Psychol2014; 33: 1309–1318.
45.
TokerSBironM. Job burnout and depression: unraveling their temporal relationship and considering the role of physical activity. J Appl Psychol2012; 97: 699–710.
46.
YangXTelamaRHirvensaloM, et al.The benefits of sustained leisure-time physical activity on job strain. Occup Med (Lond)2010; 60: 369–375.
47.
SirgyMJLeeDJ. Work-life balance: an integrative review. Appl Res Qual Life2018; 13: 229–254.
48.
MäkikangasAKinnunenU. Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample. Personal Individ Differ2003; 35: 537–557.
49.
ViertiöSKiviruusuOPiirtolaM, et al.Factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to gender difference. BMC Public Health2021; 21: 11.
50.
ZacherHSagha ZadehRHeckhausenJ,et al.Motivation and healthy aging at work. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci [Internet]2021; 76: S145–S156.
