To properly manage fatigue, it is essential to employ reliable evaluation techniques with little workplace involvement.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to investigate the applicability of salivary biomarker analysis as a tool for assessing weariness.
Methods
32 workers (15 office employees and 17 industrial workers) were included in this research after meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria and receiving informed permission from the participants. The levels of fatigue was then assessed using salivary biomarker analysis kits and a hand dynamometer.
Results
Except Grip Force (GF) at a significance level of 0.1 (p-value: 0.07), other variables had no significant alteration between two occupational groups. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and GF of both job groups had a non-significant downward trend, while the total thiol group (TTG) and lipid peroxides (LPO) of both groups demonstrated a non-significant upward trend. Biomarkers in saliva, such as total antioxidant capacity (TAC), Catalase (CAT), and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), can potentially be considered as differentiators of fatigue between cognitive and physical occupations.
Conclusions
In sub-maximal activities, such as occupational tasks, alterations in some biomarkers, including LPO and SOD, may effectively indicate signs of physical fatigue.Obviously, this is only a preliminary study, and subsequent research should be carried out to acertain these basic findings.
EdwardsRHT. Human muscle function and fatigue. In: BI-BottiCY (eds) Human muscle fatigue: physiological mechanisms. London: Ciba Foundation, 2008, pp. 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470715420.ch1
2.
KajimotoO. Development of a method of evaluation of fatigue and its economic impacts. In: WatanabeYEvengardBNatelsonBHJasonLAKuratsuneH (eds) Fatigue science for human health. Tokyo: Springer, 2008, pp. 33–46.
3.
BorgG. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med1970; 2: 92–98.
4.
JavadpourFKeshavarziSChoobinehA,et al.Validity and reliability of the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI-20) among Iranian working population. Iran J Ergon2015; 3: 50–58.
5.
MahdaviNMotamedzadeMMoghimbeigiA,et al.Effect of one carpet weaving workstation on upper trapezius fatigue. J Occup Hyg Eng2016; 2: 25–34.
6.
BlangstedAKSjøgaardGMadeleineP, et al.Voluntary low-force contraction elicits prolonged low-frequency fatigue and changes in surface electromyography and mechanomyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2005; 15: 138–148.
7.
Roman-LiuDTokarskiTKowalewskiR. Decrease of force capabilities as an index of upper limb fatigue. Ergonomics2005; 48: 930–948.
8.
MartinezKNazarahariaMRouhaniaH. K-score: a novel scoring system to quantify fatigue-related ergonomic risk based on joint angle measurements via wearable inertial measurement units. Appl Ergon2022; 102: 103757.
9.
XuYLGongYNXiaoD, et al.Discovery and identification of fatigue-related biomarkers in human saliva. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci2018; 22: 8519–8536.
10.
PurvisDGonsalvesSDeusterPA. Physiological and psychological fatigue in extreme conditions: overtraining and elite athletes. Pm&r2010; 2: 442–450.
11.
EbataCTatsutaHTatemichiM. Potential objective biomarkers for fatigue among working women. J Occup Health2017; 59: 286–291.
12.
NayakBPKarSRoutrayA,et al.A biomedical approach to retrieve information on driver’s fatigue by integrating EEG, ECG and blood biomarkers during simulated driving session. In: 2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI). IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–6.
13.
ZhongSQuYLiJ, et al.Research on metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers related to local muscle fatigue in workers with simulated manual lifting. China Occup Med2019; 6: 174–178.
14.
Di VenereMViglioSCagnoneM, et al.Advances in the analysis of “less-conventional” human body fluids: an overview of the CE-and HPLC-MS applications in the years 2015–2017. Electrophor2018; 39: 160–178.
15.
XuYXiaoDZhangH, et al.A prospective study on peptide mapping of human fatigue saliva markers based on magnetic beads. Exp Ther Med2019; 17: 2995–3002.
16.
DingMZhaoCLiY, et al.Changes in the levels of IL-1β, cortisol and chromogranin A in saliva of subjects with occupational fatigue. Exp Ther Med2020; 20: 1782–1788.
17.
ZhangJChenMPengY, et al.Wearable biosensors for human fatigue diagnosis: a review. Bioeng Transl Med2023; 8: e10318.
18.
RaS-GMaedaSHigashinoR, et al.Metabolomics of salivary fatigue markers in soccer players after consecutive games. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2014; 39: 1120–1126.
19.
FinstererJDroryVE. Wet, volatile, and dry biomarkers of exercise-induced muscle fatigue. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2016; 17: 40.
20.
BaldwinJNMcKayMJHillerCE, et al.Relationship between physical performance and self-reported function in healthy individuals across the lifespan. Musculoskelet Sci Pract2017; 30: 10–17.
21.
TwistCHightonJ. Monitoring fatigue and training adaptations in rugby players. In: The science of rugby. London, UK: Routledge, 2023, pp. 47–67.
22.
MichaelDJDaughertySSantosA, et al.Fatigue biomarker index: an objective salivary measure of fatigue level. Accid Anal Prev2012; 45: 68–73.
23.
LiuJDuCWangY,et al.Anti-fatigue activities of polysaccharides extracted from Hericium erinaceus. Exp Ther Med2015; 9: 483–487.
24.
FinstererJ. Biomarkers of peripheral muscle fatigue during exercise. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2012; 13: 18.
25.
GopalakrishnanAJiLLCirelliC. Sleep deprivation and cellular responses to oxidative stress. Sleep2004; 27: 27–35.
26.
ZappacostaBPersichilliSDe SoleP, et al.Effect of smoking one cigarette on antioxidant metabolites in the saliva of healthy smokers. Arch Oral Biol1999; 44: 485–488.
27.
YagiK. Simple assay for the level of total lipid peroxides in serum or plasma. In: Free radical and antioxidant protocols. New Jersey, USA: Springer, 1998, pp. 101–106.
28.
BenzieIFFStrainJJ. [2] Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay: direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration. In: Methods in enzymology, vol. 299. USA: Elsevier, 1999, pp. 15–27.
29.
HuMLDillardCJ. Plasma SH and GSH measurement, 1994.
FessE. Grip strength. Clinical assessment recommendations. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1992.
32.
Walker-BoneKD’AngeloSSyddallHE, et al.Heavy manual work throughout the working lifetime and muscle strength among men at retirement age. Occup Env Med2016; 73: 284–286.
33.
RostamzadehSSaremiMFereshtehT. Maximum handgrip strength as a function of type of work and hand-forearm dimensions. Work2020; 65: 679–687.
34.
NicolayCWWalkerAL. Grip strength and endurance: influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. Int J Ind Ergon2005; 35: 605–618.
35.
BloomerRJGoldfarbAHWidemanL, et al.Effects of acute aerobic and anaerobic exercise on blood markers of oxidative stress. J Strength Cond Res2005; 19: 276–285.
36.
MichalkeBRossbachBGöenT, et al.Saliva as a matrix for human biomonitoring in occupational and environmental medicine. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2015; 88: 1–44.
37.
ReidMB. Free radicals and muscle fatigue: of ROS, canaries, and the IOC. Free Radic Biol Med2008; 44: 169–179.
38.
ChengAJYamadaTRassierDE, et al.Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and contractile function in skeletal muscle during fatigue and recovery. J Physiol2016; 594: 5149–5160.
39.
SmithMAReidMB. Redox modulation of contractile function in respiratory and limb skeletal muscle. Respir Physiol Neurobiol2006; 151: 229–241.
40.
SteinbacherPEcklP. Impact of oxidative stress on exercising skeletal muscle. Biomolecules2015; 5: 356–377.
41.
HammoudaOChtourouHChahedH, et al.Diurnal variations of plasma homocysteine, total antioxidant status, and biological markers of muscle injury during repeated sprint: effect on performance and muscle fatigue—a pilot study. Chronobiol Int2011; 28: 958–967.
42.
StenholmSMaggioMLauretaniF, et al.Anabolic and catabolic biomarkers as predictors of muscle strength decline: the InCHIANTI study. Rejuvenation Res2010; 13: 3–11.
43.
MaSX. Establishing an adequate dose of acupuncture is essential for clinical trial studies. Clin Res Trials2020; 6: 1–3.
44.
MargonisKFatourosIGJamurtasAZ, et al.Oxidative stress biomarkers responses to physical overtraining: implications for diagnosis. Free Radic Biol Med2007; 43: 901–910.
