The Delphi technique and its fuzzy variant are widely employed across various sectors, including industrial applications, for eliciting expert consensus and identifying priorities. Despite its prevalence, there is limited literature on its application within the cement industry.
Objective
This review aims to explore and introduce the applications of the Delphi technique and fuzzy Delphi technique specifically within the cement industry context.
Methods
A narrative review was conducted focusing on studies between 2015 and 2024 that utilized the Delphi technique in the cement industry. The review included identifying primary areas of application such as assessing environmental impacts and prioritizing performance indicators crucial for industry stability and growth.
Results
The review revealed that the Delphi technique is predominantly used in the cement industry to assess environmental effects associated with the production process. Additionally, it serves to identify and prioritize key performance indicators that influence industry sustainability and development.
Conclusions
The findings underscore the significance of the Delphi technique and its fuzzy variant in facilitating consensus among experts in the cement industry. Future research should continue exploring these methodologies to enhance decision-making processes and address emerging challenges within the sector.
AmranMMakulNFediukR, et al.Global carbon recoverability experiences from the cement industry. Case Stud Constr Mater2022; 17: e01439.
2.
MillerSAHabertGMyersRJ,et al.Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies. One Earth2021; 4: 1398–1411.
OmaraShahestanMJOmaraShastaniSJEScienceE. Evaluating environmental considerations with checklist and Delphi methods, case study: Suran City, Iran. Environ Ecosyst Sci2017; 1: 1–4.
5.
LandetaJ. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol Forecast Soc Change2006; 73: 467–482.
6.
GaoXLiaoCQiX,et al.A scenario simulation of material substitution in the cement industry under the carbon neutral strategy: a case study of Guangdong. Sustainability2023; 15: 5736.
7.
IshikawaAAmagasaMShigaT, et al.The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst1993; 55: 241–253.
8.
DawoodKASharifKYGhaniAA, et al.Towards a unified criteria model for usability evaluation in the context of open source software based on a fuzzy Delphi method. Inf Softw Technol2021; 130: 106453.
9.
SethDShrivastavaRShrivastavaS. An empirical investigation of critical success factors and performance measures for green manufacturing in cement industry. J Manuf Technol Manag2016; 27: 1076–1101.
10.
NawazRHussainINoorS, et al.The significant impact of the economic sustainability on the cement industry by the assessment of the key performance indicators using Taguchi signal to noise ratio. Cogent Eng2020; 7: 1810383.
11.
Varela IzquierdoNCabreraHRLopez CarvajalG, et al. (eds) Methodology for the reduction and integration of data in the performance measurement of industries cement plants. In: Data Mining and Big Data: Third International Conference, DMBD 2018, Shanghai, China, June 17–22, 2018, Proceedings 3; 2018. Springer.
12.
LilaKBelaadiSSolimandoR,et al.Valorisation of organic waste: use of olive kernels and pomace for cement manufacture. J Clean Prod2020; 277: 123703.
13.
WangC-HChenY-CSulistiawanJ, et al.Hybrid approach to corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia’s cement industry. Sustainability2021; 13: 14039.
14.
PanS-YLafuenteAMLChiangP-C. Engineering, environmental and economic performance evaluation of high-gravity carbonation process for carbon capture and utilization. Appl Energy2016; 170: 269–277.
15.
SaffariAAtaeiMSereshkiF,et al.Environmental impact assessment (EIA) by using the fuzzy Delphi Folchi (FDF) method (case study: shahrood cement plant, Iran). Environ Dev Sustain2019; 21: 817–860.
16.
HurmekoskiESjølieHK. Comparing forest sector modelling and qualitative foresight analysis: cases on wood products industry. J Forest Econ2018; 31: 11–16.
17.
WardonoGMoeinsASunaryoW. The influence of organizational climate on OCB and employee engagement with job satisfaction as an intervening Variable. Utsaha (J Entrepreneurship)2022; 1: 44–54.
18.
JalilianS. Environmental risk assessment of Saman cement factory in Kermanshah city of Iran by AHP and TOPSIS methods. Cent Asian J Environ Sci Technol Innov2020; 6: 298–309.
19.
MakhanyaBNelHPretoriusJ. Application of the Delphi technique to improve the implementation of cost of quality in industry. In: Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Mexico, 2021.
20.
KavianiMAMobinMBottaniE. Supply chain resilience assessment: a grey systems theory approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2016.
21.
HariharanBKathiravanAJambunathanK,et al.Analysing of environmental issues of cement industries using dematal (MCDCM) method. Int J Emerging Technol Comput Sci Electron2021; 28: 25–27.
22.
DeeneyPNagleAJGoughF, et al.End-of-Life alternatives for wind turbine blades: sustainability indices based on the UN sustainable development goals. Resour Conserv Recycl2021; 171: 105642.
23.
WatyMSulistioH (eds) Early risks identification on sources and causes waste road construction project materials. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019. IOP Publishing.
24.
CherianTMMunuswamySJasimKM. E-procurement practices to improve the efficiency of vendor transactions in Indian cement companies. Procure Manag2020; 13: 443–461.
25.
KhanipourSYazdanyanNShahverdianiS. Providing a framework for identifying and assessing the risks faced by subsidiaries in holdings: emphasizing on the impact of the parent company's strategies. Int J Fin Manag Account2022; 7: 61–76.
26.
JamaliGAslEZolfaniS,et al.Analysing larg supply chain management competitive strategies in Iranian cement industries. E a M: Ekonomie a Managt2017; 20: 70–83.
27.
RadziszewskiPNazarkoJVilutieneT, et al.Future trends in road technologies development in the context of environmental protection. Baltic J Road Bridge Eng2016; 11: 160–168.
28.
RehmanMASethDShrivastavaRL. Impact of green manufacturing practices on organisational performance in Indian context: an empirical study. J Clean Prod2016; 137: 427–448.
29.
JabbourCJCDe FreitasTPSoubihiaDF, et al.Green and competitive: empirical evidence from ISO 9001 certified Brazilian companies. TQM J2015; 27: 22–41.
30.
AhmedMBasharIAlamST, et al.An overview of Asian cement industry: environmental impacts, research methodologies and mitigation measures. Sustain Prod Consumpt2021; 28: 1018–1039.
31.
BalsaraSJainPKRameshA. An integrated approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating climate change mitigation strategies of the Indian cement manufacturing industry. Environl Poll2019; 252: 863–878.
32.
JamilMRMNohNM. Kepelbagaian metodologi dalam penyelidikan reka bentuk dan pembangunan. Shah Alam: Qaisar Prestige Resources. 2020.
33.
SaatyTL. Özdemir MS. How many judges should there be in a group?Ann Data Sci2014; 1: 359–368.
