Given the high prevalence of hearing loss among truck drivers, using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict and detect contributing factors early can aid managers significantly.
Objective:
This study aimed to predict hearing loss using an ANN algorithm and to evaluate the weight and influence of various factors affecting hearing loss among truck drivers.
Methods:
A total of 692 truck drivers were selected for the study. Their occupational exposure histories were collected to identify factors influencing their hearing loss. The impact and weight of each factor were measured, and an ANN algorithm was used to model and predict the degree of hearing loss.
Results:
The assessment of hearing loss among truck drivers revealed a prevalence of 59.98% in the right ear and 64.74% in the left ear. The most significant average hearing loss in both ears occurred at frequencies of 6000 and 8000 Hz. According to the ANN model, age and the frequency of 2000 Hz had the greatest impact on hearing loss, while sound pressure level (SPL) had the least impact. Additionally, the relationship between overall hearing loss and the type of heavy truck indicated that drivers of HOWO brand trucks experienced the highest degree of hearing loss compared to other drivers.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates that the ANN algorithm is a promising tool for predicting hearing impairments caused by noise exposure among truck drivers.
AlvaradoJCFuentes-SantamaríaVJuizJM. Antioxidants and vasodilators for the treatment of noise-induced hearing loss: are they really effective?Front Cell Neurosci2020; 14: 571268.
2.
SongCLiHMaH, et al.Effects of noise type and noise sensitivity on working memory and noise annoyance. Noise Health2022; 24: 173–181.
3.
NeitzelRLFligorBJ. Risk of noise-induced hearing loss due to recreational sound: review and recommendations. J Acoust Soc Am2019; 146: 3911–3921.
4.
DingTYanALiuK. What is noise-induced hearing loss?Br J Hosp Med2019; 80: 525–529.
5.
ThemannCLMastersonEA. Occupational noise exposure: a review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden. J Acoust Soc Am2019; 146: 3879–3905.
6.
TakihataSMizutariKMoritaI, et al.The influence of a noisy environment on hearing impairment and tinnitus: the hearing outcomes of 50-year-old male Japan ground self-defense force personnel. Auris Nasus Larynx2020; 47: 931–937.
7.
TomidaKShimodaTNakajimaC, et al.Risk of dementia with hearing impairment and social isolation. Alzheimers Dement2024; 16: e12586.
8.
MuzaffarSOrrLRickardR, et al.Mitigating noise-induced hearing loss after blast injury. Trauma2019; 21: 121–127.
9.
Fasih-RamandiFAndisheSMehriF,et al.Do the occupational health factors affect the road accidents: a survey of heavy vehicles’ drivers in Iran. Int J Occup Hyg2022; 14: 18–35.
10.
AnsariHAnsari-MoghaddamAMohammadiM, et al.Status of hearing loss and its related factors among drivers in Zahedan, South-Eastern Iran. Glob J Health Sci2016; 8: 66.
11.
GolhosseiniSMJAliabadiMGolmohammadiR, et al.The influence of combined exposure to noise and whole-body vibration on hearing loss under simulated heavy equipment driving conditions. Appl Acoust2021; 179: 108058.
12.
RahmaniRAliabadiMGolmohammadiR, et al.Body physiological responses of city bus drivers subjected to noise and vibration exposure in working environment. Heliyon2022; 8: e10329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10329
13.
JanghorbaniMSheykhiAPourabdianS. The prevalence and correlates of hearing loss in drivers in Isfahan, Iran. Arch Iran Med2009; 12: 128–134.
14.
AlizadehAEtemadinezhadSCharatiJY,et al.Noise-induced hearing loss in bus and truck drivers in Mazandaran province, 2011. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2016; 22: 193–198.
15.
RezaeiLAlipourV. Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss among vehicle drivers at Bandar Abbas freight terminal, south of Iran. Environ Health Eng Manag2015; 2: 135–139.
16.
LopesACOtowizVGde Barros LopesPM, et al.Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in drivers. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol2012; 16: 509–514.
17.
EsmaeiliRZareSGhasemianF, et al.Predicting and classifyng hearing loss in sailors working on speed vessels using neural networks: a field study. Med Lav2022; 113: e2022023.
18.
LiuZFengJUdenL. Technology opportunity analysis using hierarchical semantic networks and dual link prediction. Technovation2023; 128: 102872.
19.
ZareSGhotbi-RavandiMRElahiShirvanH, et al.Predicting and weighting the factors affecting workers’ hearing loss based on audiometric data using C5 algorithm. Ann Glob Health2019; 85: 88. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2522
20.
ElahishirvanHGhotbi-RavandiMRZareS,et al.Using audiometric data to weigh and prioritize factors that affect workers’ hearing loss through support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. J Sound Vib2020; 54: 99. https://doi.org/10.32604/sv.2020.08839
21.
ZareSGhotbiravandiMRElahishirvanH, et al.Modeling and predicting the changes in hearing loss of workers with the use of a neural network data mining algorithm: a field study. Arch Acoust2020; 45: 303–311.
22.
BingDYingJMiaoJ, et al.Predicting the hearing outcome in sudden sensorineural hearing loss via machine learning models. Clin Otolaryngol2018; 43: 868–874.
23.
ChenZLiangQWeiZ, et al.An overview of in vitro biological neural networks for robot intelligence. Cyborg Bionic Syst2023; 4: 0001.
24.
ZhouZWangYLiuR, et al.Short-term lateral behavior reasoning for target vehicles considering driver preview characteristic. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst2021; 23: 11801–11810.
25.
ZhuC. Computational intelligence-based classification system for the diagnosis of memory impairment in psychoactive substance users. J Cloud Computing2024; 13: 19.
26.
CaoBZhaoJLvZ, et al.Multiobjective evolution of fuzzy rough neural network via distributed parallelism for stock prediction. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst2020; 28: 939–952.
27.
ZhouZZhouXQiH, et al.Near miss prediction in commercial aviation through a combined model of grey neural network. Expert Syst Appl2024; 255: 124690.
28.
FarhadianMAliabadiMDarvishiE. Empirical estimation of the grades of hearing impairment among industrial workers based on new artificial neural networks and classical regression methods. Indian J Occup Environ Med2015; 19: 84–89.
29.
AliabadiMFarhadianMDarvishiE. Prediction of hearing loss among the noise-exposed workers in a steel factory using artificial intelligence approach. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2015; 88: 779–787.
30.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Acoustics-estimation of noise-induced hearing loss, in international standard. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO. 2013;24.
31.
World Health Organization. Report of the informal working group on prevention of deafness and hearing impairment programme planning, Geneva, 18–21 June 1991. World Health Organization; 1991.
32.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 9612: 2009 Acoustics–Determination of occupational noise exposure–Engineering method. 2009.
33.
GolmohammadiRAliabadiM. Noise and vibration engineering. Hamadan, student publication. 2010: 557–278.
34.
CravenMWShavlikJW. Using neural networks for data mining. Fut Generat Comput Syst1997; 13: 211–229.
35.
PugavkoMMMaslennikovOVNekorkinVI. Multitask computation through dynamics in recurrent spiking neural networks. Sci Rep2023; 13: 3997.
HassanEShamsMYHikalNA,et al.The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study. Multimed Tools Appl2023; 82: 16591–16633.
38.
ZhaoYLiJZhangM, et al.Machine learning models for the hearing impairment prediction in workers exposed to complex industrial noise: a pilot study. Ear Hear2019; 40: 90.
39.
LuJ, et al.Robust control strategy of gradient magnetic drive for microrobots based on extended state observer. Cyborg Bionic Syst2022. https://doi.org/10.34133/2022/9835014
40.
ChenFCaoZGraisEM,et al.Contributions and limitations of using machine learning to predict noise-induced hearing loss. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2021; 94: 1097–1111.
41.
JabbariKNassiriPMonazzam EsmaeelpourMR, et al.The relationship between occupational noise exposure and noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) in small-scale industries: a case study in the City of Damavand, Iran. Biotechnol Health Sci2016; 3: 49–56.
42.
AnundALahtiEForsC,et al.The effect of low-frequency road noise on driver sleepiness and performance. Plos One2015; 10: e0123835.
43.
MondalNKDeyMDattaJK. Vulnerability of bus and truck drivers affected from vehicle engine noise. Int J Sustain Built Environ2014; 3: 199–206.
44.
AlDhahebiAMJunohAKDesaAM, et al.Formulation of noise isolation index for evaluating the interior acoustics level in vehicle cabin. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10: 1687814017708153.
45.
RehmanMNawiNMGhazaliM. Predicting noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and hearing deterioration index (HDI) in Malaysian industrial workers using GDAM algorithm. J Eng Technol2012; 3: 179–197.
46.
McKearneyRMMacKinnonRC. Objective auditory brainstem response classification using machine learning. Int J Audiol2019; 58: 224–230.
47.
ChangY-SParkHHongSH, et al.Predicting cochlear dead regions in patients with hearing loss through a machine learning-based approach: a preliminary study. PLoS One2019; 14: e0217790.
48.
ZhaoYTianYZhangM, et al.Development of an automatic classifier for the prediction of hearing impairment from industrial noise exposure. J Acoust Soc Am2019; 145: 2388–2400.
