Upper extremity rehabilitation often involves exercises aimed at improving muscle strength, tactile gnosia, and functionality. Game-based exercises (GBE) have emerged as a novel approach to rehabilitation, offering engaging activities that may enhance patient motivation and compliance.
Objective
This randomized controlled study aimed to investigate the effect of GBE on upper extremity muscle strength, tactile gnosia, and functionality.
Methods
Participants were randomly assigned to either GBE group (n = 20) or control group (CG) (n = 20). The GBE group engaged in game-based exercises twice a week for six weeks, while the CG received no intervention. Upper extremity muscle strength was assessed using a Jamar Hand Dynamometer for grip strength and a Hydraulic Pinch Gauge for pinch strength assessments. Tactile gnosia was assessed using the Static Two-Point Discrimination (2PD) Threshold test. Functionality was assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT).
Results
The GBE group showed a significant increase in grip strength (p < .001) and pinch strength (p < .001) compared to baseline, while no significant changes were observed in the CG. Additionally, the GBE group demonstrated a significant improvement in tactile gnosia as assessed by the 2PD test (p < .001). Furthermore, a significant improvement in functionality, as indicated by decreased 9HPT completion times, was observed in the GBE Group (p < .001).
Conclusions
Game-based exercises have a positive effect on upper extremity muscle strength, tactile gnosia, and functionality. These findings suggest that incorporating GBE into rehabilitation programs may be beneficial for individuals seeking to improve upper extremity function. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer durations is recommended to validate these findings and explore their long-term effects.
Pérez-MármolJMGarcía-RíosMCOrtega-ValdiviesoMA, et al.Effectiveness of a fine motor skills rehabilitation program on upper limb disability, manual dexterity, pinch strength, range of fingers motion, performance in activities of daily living, functional independency, and general self-efficacy in hand osteoart. J Hand Ther2017; 30: 262–273.
2.
HarttMHosseiniHMostafapourM. Game on: exploring the effectiveness of game-based learning. Plan Pract Res2020; 35: 589–604.
3.
PesareERoselliTCorrieroN,et al.Game-based learning and gamification to promote engagement and motivation in medical learning contexts. Smart Learn Environ2016; 3: 5.
4.
Arslan KilicogluEAralN. Game therapy and connection. In: KolevaIBaşalHAMüminTAtasoyE (eds) Educational sciences research in the globalizing world. First. Sofia: St. Kiıment Ohridski Unıveriıty Press, 2018, pp. 52–65.
5.
CaspersenCJPereiraMACurranKM. Changes in physical activity patterns in the United States, by sex and cross-sectional age. Med Sci Sports Exerc2000; 32: 1601–1609.
6.
TorlakMSGercekHUnuvarBS. Relationship between physical activity and nomophobia in university students: a cross- sectional study. ADDICTA Turkish J Addict2022; 9: 176–181.
7.
De FreitasS. Are games effective learning tools? A review of educational games. Educ Technol Soc2018; 21: 74–84.
8.
GedenMEmersonACarpenterD, et al.Predictive student modeling in game-based learning environments with word embedding representations of reflection. Int J Artif Intell Educ2021; 31: 1–23.
9.
SheldonKMFilakV. Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game-learning context: new evidence that all three needs matter. Br J Soc Psychol2008; 47: 267–283.
10.
HospelVGalandB. Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students’ engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learn Instr2016; 41: 1–10.
11.
FransenKVansteenkisteMVande BroekG,et al.The competence-supportive and competence-thwarting role of athlete leaders: an experimental test in a soccer context. PLoS One2018; 13: e0200480.
12.
BergstraSAMurgiaATe VeldeAF,et al.A systematic review into the effectiveness of hand exercise therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol2014; 33: 1539–1548.
13.
ParkJSLeeGChoiJB, et al.Game-based hand resistance exercise versus traditional manual hand exercises for improving hand strength, motor function, and compliance in stroke patients: a multi-center randomized controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation2019; 45: 221–227.
14.
LesterJCSpiresHANietfeldJL, et al.Designing game-based learning environments for elementary science education: a narrative-centered learning perspective. Inf Sci (Ny)2014; 264: 4–18.
15.
YucedalHM. Determining the effectiveness of game-based learning through educational games: a case study in A primary school. Int J Soc Sci Educ Stud2023; 10: 122–130.
16.
AralNArslan KilicogluE. Game based education programs in early childhood. In: ShapekovaNLAkBEsatoğluAE (eds) Innovations in health sciences. First. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020, pp. 54–67.
17.
TsaiF-H. An investigation of gender differences in a game-based learning environment with different game modes. EURASIA J Math Sci Technol Educ2017; 13: 3209–3226.
18.
SheelAW. Sex differences in the physiology of exercise: an integrative perspective. Exp Physiol2016; 101: 211–212.
19.
ZareMÖzdemirHTavşanMY, et al.Effect of activity-based training versus strengthening exercises on upper extremity functions in Parkinson’s patients; A randomized controlled, single blind, superiority trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg2022; 218: 107261.
20.
MathiowetzVKashmanNVollandG, et al.Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1985; 66: 69–74.
21.
LinnertzPPrieto EkJRosénB. Shape-texture-identification—STI—A test for tactile gnosis: concurrent validity of STI2. J Hand Ther2019; 32: 470–475.
22.
NolanMF. Two-point discrimination assessment in the upper limb in young adult men and women. Phys Ther1982; 62: 965–969.
YilmazKCelikFUnuvarBS. Acute effect of brace use on upper-extremity functionality in adolescent individuals with idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. Motor Control2024; 28: 50–62.
25.
GriceKOVogelKALeV, et al.Adult norms for a commercially available nine hole peg test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther2003; 57: 570–573.
26.
FangYMaYMoD, et al.Methodology of an exercise intervention program using social incentives and gamification for obese children. BMC Public Health2019; 19: 686.
27.
BrownMO’NeillNvan WoerdenH, et al.Gamification and adherence to web-based mental health interventions: a systematic review. JMIR Ment Heal2016; 3: e39.
28.
MoWBinSJLiY, et al.Effects of game-based physical education program on enjoyment in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health2024; 24: 517.
29.
RodriguesEVValderramasSRRossetinLL,et al.Effects of video game training on the musculoskeletal function of older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil2014; 30: 238–245.
30.
GentileAM. Skill acquisition: Action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In: CarryJHShepherdRD (eds) Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Rockville, MD: Aspen, 2000, pp.111–187.
31.
Shumway-CookAWoollacottMH.Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
32.
WinsteinCLewthwaiteRBlantonSR, et al.Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice. J Neurol Phys Ther2014; 38: 190–200.
33.
MercanGVarol SelçukZ. Investigating the impact of game-based learning and gamification strategies in physical education: a comprehensive systematic review. J Interdiscip Educ Theory Pract2024; 6: 1–14.
34.
OlafsdottirHBZatsiorskyVMLatashML. The effects of strength training on finger strength and hand dexterity in healthy elderly individuals. J Appl Physiol2008; 105: 1166–1178.
35.
BreinesE. Occupational therapy : activities for practice and teaching. 1st Editio. Philadelphia: Whurr, 2004.
36.
FloraS. Fine Motor Fun: Hundreds of Developmentally Age-Appropriate Activities Designed to Improve Fine Motor Skills. Minneapolis: Key Education Publishing, 2006.
37.
BostanciHEmirATarakciD,et al.Video game-based therapy for the non-dominant hand improves manual skills and grip strength. Hand Surg Rehabil2020; 39: 265–269.
38.
Marcos-AntónSJardón-HueteAOña-SimbañaED, et al.sEMG-controlled forearm bracelet and serious game-based rehabilitation for training manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2023; 20: 1–18.
39.
SzturmTImranZPooyaniaS, et al.Evaluation of a game based tele rehabilitation platform for in-home therapy of hand-arm function post stroke: feasibility study. PM R2021; 13: 45–54.
40.
DunnW. The sensations of everyday life: empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. Am J Occup Ther2001; 55: 608–620.
41.
JulooriALiYZhuW. Development of a game-based and haptically enhanced application for people with visual impairment. In: AhramTFalcão C (eds) Advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer, 2018, pp. 186–192.
42.
RodgerSZivianiJ. Play-based occupational therapy. Int J Disabil Dev Educ1999; 46: 337–365.
43.
WangYCBohannonRWKapelluschJ, et al.Dexterity as measured with the 9-hole peg test (9-HPT) across the age span. J Hand Ther2015; 28: 53–60.
44.
KanitkarAParmarSTSzturmTJ, et al.Parents’ perspectives on a computer game–assisted rehabilitation program for manual dexterity in children with cerebral palsy: qualitative analysis of expectations, child engagement, and benefits. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol2021; 8: e24337.
45.
HungJWChouCXChangYJ, et al.Comparison of Kinect2Scratch game-based training and therapist-based training for the improvement of upper extremity functions of patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled single-blinded trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2019; 55: 542–550.
46.
CrandallKJNeils-StrunjasJ. A game-based health program for improving functional health and social engagement in long-term care residents. J Aging Long-Term Care2019; 2: 91–95.
47.
YangCHanXJinM, et al.The effect of video game–based interventions on performance and cognitive function in older adults: Bayesian network meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games2021; 9: e27058.
48.
JohnsonDDeterdingSKuhnK-A, et al.Gamification for health and wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Internet Interv2016; 6: 89–106.
