Ergonomics risk assessment tools are vital for evaluating awkward postures in various industries, with a primary focus on biomechanical factors. However, existing observational techniques often fail to meet specific postural loading criteria or are inadequate to establish validity, especially in agricultural settings. Enhancements in these tools have been guided by extensive literature reviews.
Objective
This study aimed to develop a new assessment tool, the Agricultural Ergonomics Risk Assessment (AERA), by utilizing electromyography (EMG) to classify postural loads and prioritize risks.
Method
This paper describes an experimental study utilizing EMG to analyze postural loads, emphasizing biomechanical factors and including an evaluation of individual and occupational risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). The validity and reliability of AERA were assessed by five experts and thirty evaluators.
Results
The study revealed strong effects of varying loads and postures on muscle activation. A key finding was the application of biomechanical factors to assess risk levels associated with awkward postures, especially regarding the prevalence of MSD in the neck, trunk, and arm regions. The evaluation indicated a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.97 for precision in content validity of risk assessment criteria. Reliability tests comparing AERA with OWAS, RULA, and REBA yielded Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.99, 0.84, 0.93, and 0.88, respectively.
Conclusion
AERA's evaluation criteria incorporating specific and comprehensive risk factors produced the highest levels of test-retest reliability, making it a valuable screening tool for the agricultural sector.
Barneo-AlcantaraMDiaz-PerezMGomez-GalanM, et al.Musculoskeletal disorders in agriculture: a review from web of science core collection. Agron-Basel2021; 11: 2017.
2.
ThepaksornPPongpanichS. Occupational injuries and illnesses and associated costs in Thailand. Saf Health Work2014; 5: 66–72.
3.
MudiyanselageSENguyenPHDRajabiMS,et al.Automated workers’ ergonomic risk assessment in manual material handling using sEMG wearable sensors and machine learning. Electronics2021; 10: 2558.
4.
AkbarKATryPViwattanakulvanidP,et al.Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among farmers in the Southeast Asia region: a systematic review. Saf Health WORK2023; 14: 243–249.
5.
KumaravelooKSKolstrupCL. Agriculture and musculoskeletal disorders in low- and middle-income countries. J Agromedicine2018; 23: 227–248.
6.
KaewdokTSirisawasdSTaptagapornS. Agricultural risk factors related musculoskeletal disorders among older farmers in Pathum Thani Province, Thailand. J Agromedicine2021; 26: 185–192.
7.
ChaikliengSSuggaravetsiriPPoochadaW, et al.The burden of work-related diseases and injuries among agriculturists: a three-year retrospective study in Thailand. Safety2022; 8: 78.
8.
PochanaKChaiprapatSAkkeesuwanA. Application of ergonomic risk assessment tools in agriculture:a scoping review. J Public Health Naresuan Univ2023; 5: 16–41.
9.
FelekogluBTasanSO. Ergonomic risk assessment for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic reactive / proactive integrated approach. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ2017; 32: 777–793.
10.
BartuziPRoman-LiuDTokarskiT. A study of the influence of muscle type and muscle force level on individual frequency bands of the EMG power spectrum. Int J Occup Saf Ergon JOSE2007; 13: 241–254.
11.
SoaresCOPereiraBFPereira GomesMV, et al.Preventive factors against work-related musculoskeletal disorders: narrative review. Rev Bras Med Trab Publicacao of Assoc Nac Med Trab-ANAMT2019; 17: 415–430.
12.
AaråsAWestgaardRHStrandenE. Postural angles as an indicator of postural load and muscular injury in occupational work situations. Ergonomics1988; 31: 915–933.
13.
KeeD. Comparison of LEBA and RULA based on postural load criteria and epidemiological data on musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 3967.
14.
GrabenPRSchallMCGallagherS, et al.Reliability analysis of observation-based exposure assessment tools for the upper extremities: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 10595.
15.
MagnavitaNElovainioMDe NardisI, et al.Environmental discomfort and musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med-Oxf2011; 61: 196–201.
16.
EliassonKLindCMNymanT. Factors influencing ergonomists’ use of observation-based risk-assessment tools. Work- J Prev Assess Rehabil2019; 64: 93–106.
17.
NazmiNRahmanMAAYamamotoSI, et al.A review of classification techniques of EMG signals during isotonic and isometric contractions. SENSORS2016; 16: 1304.
18.
ZareMBiauSBrunetR, et al.A comparison of neck bending and flexion measurement methods for assessment of ergonomic risk. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2015; 21: 330–335.
19.
Abd RahmanMNAbdul RaniMRRohaniJM. WERA: an observational tool develop to investigate the physical risk factor associated with WMSDs. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)2011; 40: 19–36.
20.
ChanderDSCavatortaMP. An observational method for postural ergonomic risk assessment (PERA). Int J Ind Ergon2017; 57: 32–41.
21.
HlavenkaTMChristnerVFKGregoryDE. Neck posture during lifting and its effect on trunk muscle activation and lumbar spine posture. Appl Ergon2017; 62: 28–33.
22.
LeeKHMinJYByunS. Electromyogram-based classification of hand and finger gestures using artificial neural networks. Sensors2022; 22: 225.
23.
RuennusanMChaikittipornCTaptagapornS,et al.Development of an ergonomics risk assessment tool for repetitive task assessment (RTRA). WORK- J Prev Assess Rehabil2023; 74: 1595–1611.
24.
ChoYJKimJY. The effects of load, flexion, twisting and window size on the stationarity of trunk muscle EMG signals. Int J Ind Ergon2012; 42: 287–292.
25.
HaSMCynnHSKwonOY, et al.A reliability of electromyographic normalization methods for the infraspinatus muscle in healthy subjects. J Hum Kinet2013; 36: 69–76.
26.
CastroMCFColombiniELJuniorPTA, et al.sEMG feature evaluation for identification of elbow angle resolution in graded arm movement. Biomed Eng Online2014; 13: 155.
27.
BalasubramanianVNarendranTtSai PraveenV. RBG Risk scale: an integrated tool for ergonomic risk assessments. Int J Ind Syst Eng2011; 8: 104–116.
28.
DasDKumarASharmaM. A systematic review of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among handicraft workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon2020; 26: 55–70.
29.
VillageJTraskCLuongN, et al.Development and evaluation of an observational back-exposure sampling tool (back-EST) for work-related back injury risk factors. Appl Ergon2009; 40: 538–544.
30.
YamanoiYOgiriYKatoR. EMG-based posture classification using a convolutional neural network for a myoelectric hand. Biomed Signal Process Control2020; 55: 101574.
31.
PhinyomarkAPhukpattaranontPLimsakulC. Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Syst Appl2012; 39: 7420–7431.
32.
BoriboonsuksriPTaptagapornSKaewdokT. Ergonomic task analysis for prioritization of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Mango-harvesting farmers. SAFETY2022; 8: 6.
33.
TriwiyantoTRahmawatiTYuliantoE, et al.Dynamic feature for an effective elbow-joint angle estimation based on electromyography signals. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci2020; 19: 178–187.
34.
HelligTMertensABrandlC. The interaction effect of working postures on muscle activity and subjective discomfort during static working postures and its correlation with OWAS. Int J Ind Ergon2018; 68: 25–33.
35.
WhelanSRuaneDJMcNamaraJ, et al.Disability on Irish farms–a real concern. J Agromedicine2009; 14: 157–163.
36.
FathallahFA. Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture. Appl Ergon2010; 41: 738–743.
37.
LeeHChoSKimJ, et al.Difference in health status of Korean farmers according to gender. Ann Occup Environ Med2019; 31: 7.
38.
GjesdalSBratbergEMaelandJG. Gender differences in disability after sickness absence with musculoskeletal disorders: five-year prospective study of 37,942 women and 26,307 men. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2011; 12: 37.
39.
XiaoHMcCurdySAStoecklin-MaroisMT, et al.Agricultural work and chronic musculoskeletal pain among latino farm workers: the MICASA study. Am J Ind Med2013; 56: 216–225.
40.
OsborneABlakeCMeredithD, et al.Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Irish farm operators. Am J Ind Med2013; 56: 235–242.
41.
RoseenEJRajendranISteinP, et al.Association of back pain with mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Gen Intern Med2021; 36: 3148–3158.
42.
HartmanEOude VrielinkHHEHuirneRBM,et al.Risk factors for sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders among self-employed Dutch farmers: a case-control study. Am J Ind Med2006; 49: 204–214.
43.
ParkKRohSLeeJ, et al.Health status and related factors in farmers by SF-12. Ann Occup Environ Med2015; 27: 2.
44.
HolleyALLawEFThamSW, et al.Current smoking as a predictor of chronic musculoskeletal pain in young adult twins. J Pain2013; 14: 1131–1139.
45.
GovinduNKBabski-ReevesK. Effects of personal, psychosocial and occupational factors on low back pain severity in workers. Int J Ind Ergon2014; 44: 335–341.
46.
KimMGKimKSRyooJH,et al.Relationship between occupational stress and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Korean male firefighters. Ann Occup Environ Med2013; 25: 9.
47.
XuHRZhangYHNgoTL, et al.Association between smoking and incident back pain: a prospective cohort study with 438,510 participants. J Glob Health2023; 13: 04152.
48.
EtanaGAyeleMAbdissaD,et al.Prevalence of work related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among bank staff in Jimma City, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019: an institution-based cross-sectional study. J PAIN Res2021; 14: 2071–2082.
49.
SinsongsookT.The prevalence and work related factors of musculoskeletal complaints among nursing personnel in King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital [Internet]. [cited 2024 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.car.chula.ac.th/display7.php?bib=1688915
50.
Van EerdDMunhallCIrvinE, et al.Effectiveness of workplace interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders and symptoms: an update of the evidence. Occup Environ Med2016; 73: 62–70.
51.
GandolfiMGZampariniFSpinelliA, et al.Musculoskeletal disorders among Italian dentists and dental hygienists. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 2705.
52.
RibasTMTeodoriRMMescolottoFF, et al.Impact of physical activity levels on musculoskeletal symptoms and absenteeism of workers of a metallurgical company. Rev Bras Med Trab Publicacao Of Assoc Nac Med Trab-ANAMT2021; 18: 425–433.
53.
SilvaJdDantasDACda SilvaLB, et al.Assessment of the influence of psychosocial factors on musculoskeletal disorder symptom intensity. Work2022; 71: 187–200.
54.
BhuanantanondhPBuchholzBArphornS, et al.The prevalence of and risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders in Thai oil palm harvesting workers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 5474.
55.
NgYGMohd TamrinSBMohd YusoffIS, et al.Risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders among oil palm fruit harvesters during early harvesting stage. Ann Agric Environ Med AAEM2015; 22: 286–292.
56.
ChokprasitPYimthiangSVeerasakulS. Predictors of low back pain risk among rubber harvesters. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 10492.
57.
MunalaJMOlivierBKarugutiWM,et al.Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders amongst flower farm workers in Kenya. SOUTH Afr J Physiother2021; 77: a1515.
58.
MinDBaekSParkHw, et al.Prevalence and characteristics of musculoskeletal pain in Korean farmers. Ann Rehabil Med2016; 40: 1–13.
59.
LokaewPWichatornTChaikliengS. Heat related illness and factors related to heat exposure of agriculturists: a systematic review. KKU Res J Grad Stud2023; 23: 203–216.
ACGIH. Heat stress and strain: TLV® physical agents 7th edition documentation. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2009.
62.
AkkeesuwanA. Prevalence and ergonomic risk factors related musculoskeletal disorders among palm cutting workers in Sinpun subdistrict, Khao Phanom district, Krabi province. Thesis, Graduated School, Thammasat University, Rangsit, Pathum Thani, 2017
63.
DasB. Gender differences in prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among the rice farmers of West Bengal, India. WORK- J Prev Assess Rehabil2015; 50: 229–240.
64.
ThetkathuekAMeepraditPSa-ngiamsakT. A cross-sectional study of musculoskeletal symptoms and risk factors in Cambodian fruit farm workers in Eastern Region, Thailand. Saf Health Work2018; 9: 192–202.
65.
HoogendoornWEBongersPMde VetHCW, et al.High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med2002; 59: 323–328.
66.
LeeHAhnHParkCG, et al.Psychosocial factors and work-related musculoskeletal disorders among southeastern Asian female workers living in Korea. Saf Health Work2011; 2: 183–193.
67.
ShanCLAdonMYBRahmanABA, et al.Prevalence of neck pain and associated factors with personal characteristics, physical workloads and psychosocial among male rubber workers in FELDA settlement Malaysia. Glob J Health Sci2012; 4: 94–104.
68.
LeeHWilburJKimMJ,et al.Psychosocial risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the lower-back among long-haul international female flight attendants. J Adv Nurs2008; 61: 492–502.
69.
Mateos-GonzalezLRodríguez-SuárezJLlosaJA. A systematic review of the association between job insecurity and work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind2024; 34: 79–99.
JacobJTeschFWendeD, et al.Development of a risk score to identify patients at high risk for a severe course of COVID-19. Z Gesundheitswissenschaften J Public Health2023; 32: 1–10.
72.
KarhuOKansiPKuorinkaI. Correcting working postures in industry: a practical method for analysis. Appl Ergon1977; 8: 199–201.
73.
DavidGWoodsVLiG,et al.The development of the quick exposure check (QEC) for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon2008; 39: 57–69.
74.
JoshiMDeshpandeV. Investigative study and sensitivity analysis of rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Int J Ind Ergon2020; 79: 103004.
75.
Massiris FernandezMAlvaro FernandezJBajoJM,et al.Ergonomic risk assessment based on computer vision and machine learning. Comput Ind Eng2020; 149: 106816.
76.
PlantardPShumHPHLe PierresAS,et al.Validation of an ergonomic assessment method using kinect data in real workplace conditions. Appl Ergon2017; 65: 562–569.
77.
NilvarangkulKPhajanTLaohasiriwongW, et al.Development and validation of a work-related low back pain risk-assessment tool for sugarcane farmers. Ind Health2018; 56: 320–326.
