BP are the most common means for carrying items and are used by a large population but transporting heavy loads (over extended periods of time) can lead to a variety of health-related problems. An ergonomic backpack (EBP) was designed as a potential solution to reduce the incidence of injuries associated with heavy backpack weight.
Objective
The objective of this study was to design a novel ergonomic offloading backpack that reduced loads on the shoulder and spine compared to a traditional modern day backpack (BP).
Methods
Strap tension and shoulder loads were measured in a common two strap style commuter BP and the EBP during quiet (vertical) stance conditions for five weight increments (0 kg to 11 kg) to confirm the offloading capabilities of the EBP. Portable luggage scales were attached directly to the shoulder straps and configured to measure strap tension. Load sensors placed underneath the shoulder straps provided an estimate of the total force acting on the shoulders and transferred to the spine.
Results
The EBP had a large effect size and significant reduction (p < 0.05) in shoulder loads compared to a traditional BP for all bag weight conditions. Similarly, the EBP had a large effect size in reducing strap tension compared to the traditional modern day two strap BP.
Conclusion
A newly designed EBP was effective at transferring a significantly large portion of the shoulder and spine loads to the pelvic region.
HarmanEHanKFrykmanP, et al.The effects of backpack weight on the biomechanics of load carriage. Natick, MA: Army Research Institution of Environmental Medicine, 2000. Report No.: ADA377886.
8.
Rodríguez-SotoAJaworskiRJensenA, et al.Effect of load carriage on lumbar spine kinematics. Spine2013; 38: E783–E791.
9.
VacheronJPoumaratGChandezonR,et al.Changes of contour of the spine caused by load carrying. Surg Radiol Anat1999; 21: 109–113.
EstrazulasJAEstrazulasJAGhellerRG, et al.Usability and effects on gait of an optimized schoolchildren backpack. Work2023; 74: 1419–1427.
14.
AlamiATehraniHLael-MonfaredE, et al.Ergonomic factors of school bags and their adaptation to the weight of students. Work2020; 65: 809–820.
15.
DockrellSBlakeCSimmsC. Guidelines for schoolbag carriage: an appraisal of safe load limits for schoolbag weight and duration of carriage. Work2015; 53: 679–688.
16.
GolrizSWalkerB. Backpacks. Several factors likely to influence design and usage: a systematic literature review. Work2012; 42: 519–531.
17.
AmiriMDezfooliMSMortezaeiSR. Designing an ergonomics backpack for student aged 7-9 with user centred design approach. Work2012; 41: 1193–1201.
18.
MallakzadehMJavidiMAzimiS,et al.Analyzing the potential benefits of using a backpack with non-flexible straps. Work2016; 54: 11–20.
Lindstrom-HazelD. The backpack problem is evident but the solution is less obvious. Work2009; 32: 329–338.
21.
PerroneMOrrRHingW, et al.The impact of backpack loads on school children: A critical narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2018; 15: 25–29.
22.
SturdyJSessomsPSilvermanA. A backpack load sharing model to evaluate lumbar and hip joint contact forces during shoulder borne and hip belt assisted load carriage. Applied Ergonomics2021; 90: 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103277
ToghroliRReisyLMansourianM, et al.Backpack improper use causes musculoskeletal injuries in adolescents: A systematic review. J Edu Health Promot2021; 237: 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_306_20
25.
WaradkarCPalsuleS. Effectiveness of an ergonomic intervention program in college students carrying backpack in a metropolitan city. Int J Health Sci Res2021; 11: 157–170.
26.
BrackleyHMStevensonJMSelingerJCEffect of backpack load placement on posture and spinal curvature in prepubescent children. Work2009; 32: 351–360.
27.
SteeleEBialocerkowskiAGrimmerK.The postural effects of load carriage on young people-a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders2003; 4: 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-12
28.
AttwellsRBirrellSHooperR,et al.Military load carriage: The effect of increased load, gender and load carriage duration on gait and posture. Loughborough, UK: Loughborough University, 2007.
29.
WangHFrameJOzimekE, et al.The Effects of Load Carriage and Muscle Fatigue on Lower-Extremity Joint Mechanics. Res Q Exerc Sport2013; 84: 305–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2013.814097
30.
ParkJ. Second Spine: Upper Body Assistive Device for Human Load Carriage. J Mech Rob2015; 7: 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029293
31.
GolrizSHebertJJBo ForemanK,et al.The effect of shoulder strap width and load placement on shoulder-backpack interface pressure. Work2017; 58: 455–461.
32.
JayaratneKJacobsKFernandoD. Global healthy backpack initiatives. Work2012; 41: 5553–5557.
