What is the primary focus of business communication teachers in classrooms in which English is not the native language of students? Do they concentrate on strategies for improved professional and interpersonal communication skills, or do they direct most attention to purely language issues? These questions have become more important because the number of nonnative English students in business communication classrooms in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and so forth is increasing and because English is becoming more important for business and education in many Asian and African countries. This article outlines some of the language-related problems that occur when teaching nonnative speakers business communication and calls for a drive to address the issue of acceptable language usage in this context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, Sunita, and Victoria Hsui.The English Language in Singapore: Current Perspectives on the Teaching of Writing. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics, 1996.
2.
Afolayan, A.“Acceptability of English as a Second Language in Nigeria.”Acceptability in Language. Ed. S. Greenbaum. The Hague, Neth.: Mouton, 1977. 13-25.
3.
Barbara, Leila, M.Antonietta A. Celani, Heloisa Collins, and Mike Scott. “A Survey of Communication Patterns in the Brazilian Business Context.”English for Specific Purposes15.2 (1996): 57-71.
4.
Boone, Louis, David Kurtz, and Judy Block.Contemporary Business Communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
5.
Bovee, Courtland, and John Thill.Business Communication Today. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
6.
Brown, Adam.English in Southeast Asia 96. Singapore: National Institute of Education, 1997.
7.
Connor, Ulla, Kenneth Davis, Teun De Rycker, Elisabeth Phillips, and J. Piet Verckens. “An International Course in International Business Writing: Belgium, Finland, the United States.”Business Communication Quarterly60 (1997): 63-74.
8.
Dada, A.“The New Language Policy in Nigeria: Its Problems and Its Chances of Success.”Language of Inequality. Ed. N. Wolfson and J. Manes. Berlin, Ger.: Mouton, 1985.
9.
Dulek, Ronald, and John Fielden.Principles of Business Communication. New York: Macmillan, 1990.
10.
Foley, Joseph, ed.New Englishes: The Case of Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 1988.
11.
Frank, Jane“Miscommunication across Cultures: The Case of Marketing in Indian English.”World Englishes7 (1988): 25-36.
12.
Goby, Valerie. “All Business Students Need to Know the Same Things! The Non-Culture-Specific Nature of Communication Needs.”JBTC13 (1999): 179-89.
13.
Goby, Valerie. “Arguments against Providing Model Answers in the Writing Skills Classroom: The Singaporean Case.”TESL Reporter30.2 (1997): 28-33.
14.
Goby, Valerie. “Communication Skills of Students on Professional Attachment.” Unpublished report. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 1996.
15.
Gopinathan, Saravanan, Anne Pakir, Wah Kam Ho, and V. Saravanan, eds.Language, Society, and Education in Singapore: Issues and Trends. Singapore: Times Academic Press, 1994.
16.
Guffey, Mary Ellen.Business Communication: Process & Product. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing, 1997.
17.
Ho, Mian Lian, and John Platt.Dynamics of a Contact Continuum. Oxford, Eng.: Clarendon, 1993.
18.
Ho, Wah Kam. “The English Language in Singapore and the Teaching of It: A Summing-up.”The English Language in Singapore: Implications for Teaching. Ed. Su Ching Teng and Mian Lian Ho. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics, 1995. 133-36.
19.
Hoft, Nancy.International Technical Communication: How to Export Information about High Technology. New York: John Wiley, 1995.
20.
Kachru, B., ed.The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1982.
21.
Leininger, Carol. “The Alignment of Global Management Strategies, International Communication Approaches, and Individual Rhetorical Choices.”JBTC11 (1997): 261-80.
22.
Louhiala-Salminen, Leena. “The Business Communication Classroom vs. Reality: What Should We Teach Today?”English for Specific Purposes15.1 (1996): 37-51.
23.
Lundelius, J.“Language and Business: The Hong Kong Mix.”Business Communication Quarterly60.4 (1997): 112-25.
24.
McAlpine, R.Global English for Global Business. Auckland, NZ: Longman, 1997.
Pakir, Anne, ed.The English Language in Singapore: Standards and Norms. Singapore: Uni-Press, 1993.
27.
Platt, John. “The Sub-Varieties of Singapore English: Their Sociolectal and Functional Status.”The English Language in Singapore. Ed. W. Crewe. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 1977. 83-95.
28.
Platt John, and Heidi Weber.English in Singapore and Malaysia. Oxford, Eng.: Oxford University Press, 1980.
29.
Platt, John, Heidi Weber, and Mian Lian Ho.The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.
30.
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon.Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford, Eng.: Blackwell, 1995.
31.
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon.Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford, Eng.: Blackwell, 1995.
32.
St. John, Maggie Jo. “Business Is Booming: Business English in the 1990s.”English for Specific Purposes15.1 (1996): 3-18.
33.
Teng, Su Ching, and Mian Lian Ho, eds.The English Language in Singapore: Implications for Teaching. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics, 1995.
34.
Tham, S. C.Multi-Lingualism in Singapore: Two Decades of Development. Census of Population 1990. Monograph no. 6. Singapore: Dept. of Statistics, 1996.
35.
Usluata, Ayseli. “From Conflict to Harmony: A Heterogeneous Group in a Business Communication Class in Turkey.”Business Communication Quarterly60 (1997): 124-33.
36.
Verluyten, S. Paul. “Business Communication and Intercultural Communication in Europe: The State of the Art.”Business Communication Quarterly60 (1997): 135-43.
37.
Weiss, Edmond H.“Technical Communication across Cultures: Five Philosophical Questions.”JBTC12 (1998): 253-69.
