This article examines the Work for Hire Doctrine and its importance to technical communication instructors who prepare students to create intellectual products in workplace settings. The author explains how the Work for Hire Doctrine operates in practice, charts the progressive legal treatment of work for hire through case law, and calls attention to the developing trend in the courts to support a more protectionist stance regarding creative products.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldon Accessories, Ltd. v. Spiegel, Inc. 738 F. 2d 548. 1984.
2.
Brinson, J. Dianne, and Mark Radcliffe.Multimedia Law Handbook: A Practical Guide for Developers and Publishers. Menlo Park, CA: Ladera, 1994.
3.
Burr, Sherri L.“A Critical Assessment of Reid's Work for Hire Framework and its Potential Impact on the Marketplace for Scholarly Works.”John Marshall Law Review24 (1990): 119-43.
4.
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid. 109 US Supreme Ct. 2166. 1989.
5.
Computers and Composition. Special issue on intellectual property. 15.2 (1998).
6.
Copyright Act of 1909. US Code Sec. 101-914. 1988.
7.
Copyright Act of 1976. US Code Sec. 101-914. 1988.
8.
Duboff, Leonard D.“An Academic's Copyright: Publish and Perish.”Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.32 (1985): 17-49.
9.
Dumas v. Gommerman. 865 F. 2d 1093. 9th Cir. 1989.
10.
Easter Seal Society for Crippled Children v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. 815 F. 2d 323. 5th Cir. 1987.
11.
Goldsheid, Julie“Copyright Law: Toward an Improved ‘Works for Hire’ Doctrine.”1990 Annual Survey of American Law557-79.
12.
Gurak, Laura“Technical Communication, Copyright, and the Shrinking Public Domain.”Computers and Composition14 (1997): 329-42.
13.
Herrington, TyAnna K.“The Interdependency of Fair Use and the First Amendment.”Computers and Composition15 (1998): 125-43.
14.
Herrington, TyAnna K.“Who Owns My Work? The State of Work for Hire for Academics in Technical Communication.”JBTC13 (1999): 125-53.
15.
Kairos. Special issue on intellectual property. May 1998. Http://english.ttu.edu/kairos/3.1/index_f.html
16.
Lang, Susan“Who Owns the Course? Online Composition Courses in an Era of Changing Intellectual Property Policies.”Computers and Composition15 (1998): 215-28.
17.
Lawrence, John Shelton. “Donald Duck v. Chilean Socialism: A Fair Use Exchange.”Fair Use and Free Inquiry: Copyright Law and the New Media. Ed. John Shelton Lawrence and Bernard Timberg. Newark, NJ: Ablex, 1989. 45-60.
18.
Lunsford, Andrea A., and Susan West. “Intellectual Property and Composition Studies.”College Composition and Communication47 (1996): 383-411.
19.
NET Act of 1998. H.R. 2265. 7 Jan. 1997.
20.
Nimmer, Melville B.Nimmer on Copyright: A Treatise on the Law of Literary, Musical and Artistic Property, and the Protection of Ideas. New York: Bender, 1978.
21.
Nolley, Shannon“The Work for Hire Doctrine and the Second Circuit's Decision in Carter v. Hemsley-Spear.”DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law7 (1996): 103-31.
22.
Patterson, L. Ray, and Stanley F. Birch, Jr., “Copyright and Free Speech Rights.”Journal of Intellectual Property Law4 (1996): 1-23.
23.
Simon, Todd F.“Faculty Writings: Are They ‘Works Made for Hire’ under the 1976 Copyright Act?”Journal of College and University Law9 (1982-83): 485-513.
24.
Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act. S 505. Oct. 1998.
25.
US Const. Intellectual Property Provision. Art. 1. Sec. 8. Cl. 8.
26.
Woodmansee, Martha, and Peter Jaszi“The Law of Texts: Copyright in the Academy.”College English57 (1995): 769-89.
27.
Work for Hire Doctrine. US Code Sec. 101-810. 1982.
