Rhetorical study of technology will benefit from a broad view of technology that considers it as a cultural phenomenon, including epistemic, artifactual, technical, economic, aesthetic, and political aspects. To understand twentieth-century American technology this way, it is useful to gain some historical perspective on its development, particularly in the past 50 years. Many accounts mark World War II as a turning point in the role of technology in our culture and in the relations of technology with government, science, and industry. This article synthesizes some of these accounts and concludes with four ways that technology should prove to be rhetorically distinct from science.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balogh, Brian
. Chain Reaction: Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power, 1945-1975. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
2.
Barnes, Barry
, and David Edge, eds. Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.
3.
Beck, Ulrich
. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. 1986. Ed. Mike Featherstone. Trans. Mark Ritter. London: Sage, 1992.
4.
Bell, Daniel
. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
5.
Beniger, James R.The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.
6.
Bernstein, Barton J.“The Debate on Industrial Reconversion: The Protection of Oligopoly and Military Control of the Economy.”American Journal of Economics and Sociology26 (1967): 159-172.
7.
Bitzer, Lloyd
. “The Rhetorical Situation.”Philosophy and Rhetoric1 (1968): 1-14.
8.
Brunton, Bruce
. “An Historical Perspective on the Future of the Military-Industrial Complex.”Social Science Journal28.1 (1991): 45-62.
9.
Burke, Kenneth
. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. 1935. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.
10.
Burke, Kenneth
. “The Rhetorical Situation.”Communication: Ethical and Moral Issues. Ed. Lee Thayer. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1973. 263-275.
11.
Bush, Vannevar
. “Science, The Endless Frontier.” 1945. Rept. to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. Rpt. National Science Foundation, 1960.
12.
Demchak, Chris C.Military Organizations, Complex Machines: Modernization in the U.S. Armed Services. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.
13.
Eisenhower, Dwight D.“Farewell Radio and Television Address to the American People.”Public Papers of the Presidents. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1961. 1035-1040.
14.
England, J. Merton
. “Dr. Bush Writes a Report: `Science—the Endless Frontier.' ”Science191 (1976): 41-47.
15.
Feenberg, Andrew
. Critical Theory of Technology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
16.
Foucault, Michel
. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Ed. Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon, 1980.
17.
Galbraith, John Kenneth
. The New Industrial State. 1967. 2nd ed.Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971.
18.
Galison, Peter
, and Bruce Hevly, eds. Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.
19.
Gramsci, Antonio
. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffren Nowell Smith. New York: International, 1971.
20.
Griffin, Charles J. G.“New Light on Eisenhower's Farewell Address.”Presidential Studies Quarterly22 (1992): 469-479.
21.
Habermas, Jürgen
. “Technology and Science as `Ideology.' ”Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon, 1970. 81-122.
22.
Harvey, David
. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford, Eng.: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
23.
Held, David
. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
24.
Hodgson, Godfrey
. America in Our Time. New York: Random House, 1976.
25.
Hooks, Gregory
. Forging the Military-Industrial Complex: World War II's Battle of the Potomac. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1991.
26.
Hughes, Thomas P.American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870-1970. New York: Viking, 1989.
27.
Hughes, Thomas P.
, and Agatha C. Hughes, eds. Lewis Mumford: Public Intellectual. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
28.
Kármán, Theodore von. US Army Air Forces
. “Toward New Horizons: Science, the Key to Air Supremacy.” Rept. to General of the Army H. H. Arnold. ATI-140661. 1945.
29.
Kevles, Daniel J.“K1S2: Korea, Science, and the State.”Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Ed. Peter Galison and Bruce Hevly. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992. 312-333.
30.
Kevles, Daniel J.
. “The National Science Foundation and the Debate over Postwar Research Policy, 1942-1945.”Isis68 (1977): 5-26.
31.
Kevles, Daniel J.
. “Scientists, the Military, and Control of Postwar Defense Research: The Case of the Research Board for National Security, 1944-46.”Technology and Culture16 (1975): 20-47.
32.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee
. “Layers of Interests, Layers of Influence: Business and the Genesis of the National Science Foundation.”Science, Technology, and Human Values19 (1994): 259-282.
33.
[Latour, Bruno] Jim Johnson. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer.”Social Problems35 (1988): 298-310.
34.
Latour, Bruno
. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.
35.
Layton, Edwin T., Jr.The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession. 1971. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986.
36.
Lerner, Max
. “Big Technology and Neutral Technicians.”American Quarterly4 (1952): 99-109.
37.
Lyotard, Jean-François
. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. 1979. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Theory and History of Literature 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
38.
Marcuse, Herbert
. “Some Social Implications of Modern Technology.”Studies in Philosophy and Social Science9 (1941): 414-439.
39.
Marx, Karl
. Capital. 1867. Trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. Great Books of the Western World 50. 3rd ed.Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
40.
Marx, Leo
. “The idea of `Technology' and Postmodern Pessimism.”Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Ed. Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994. 237-257.
41.
Medhurst, Martin J.“Reconceptualizing Rhetorical History: Eisenhower's Farewell Address.”Quarterly Journal of Speech80 (1994): 195-218.
42.
Melman, Seymour
. Pentagon Capitalism: The Political Economy of War. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
43.
Mills, C. Wright
. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press, 1956.
44.
Morrison, Denton E.“Soft Tech/Hard Tech, Hi Tech/Lo Tech: A Social Movement Analysis of Appropriate Technology.”Sociological Inquiry53 (1983): 220-251.
45.
Mumford, Lewis
. The Myth of the Machine: The Pentagon of Power. Vol. 2. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1970. 2 vols.
46.
Mumford, Lewis
. The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development. Vol. 1. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1967. 2 vols.
47.
Mumford, Lewis
. Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1934.
48.
Myers, Greg
. “Out of the Laboratory and Down to the Bay: Writing in Science and Technology Studies.”Written Communication13 (1996): 5-43.
49.
Noble, David F.Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation. New York: Knopf, 1984.
50.
Ong, Walter J.Orality and Literacy: Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen, 1982.
51.
Perrow, Charles
. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
52.
Polanyi, Michael
. “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory.”Minerva1 (1962): 54-73.
53.
Price, Derek J. de S.Little Science, Big Science... and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
54.
Pursell, Carroll W., Jr.
, ed. The Military-Industrial Complex. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.
55.
Rammert, Werner
. “From Mechanical Engineering to Information Engineering: Phenomenology and Social Roots of an Emerging Type of Technology.”New Technology at the Outset: Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations. Ed. Meinolf Dierkes and Ute Hoffmann. Frankfurt, Ger.: Campus Verlag, 1992. 193-205.
56.
Reingold, Nathan
. “Vannevar Bush's New Deal for Research: Or the Triumph of the Old Order.”Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences17 (1987): 299-344.
57.
Rosenberg, Nathan
. “Marx as a Student of Technology.”Monthly Review28.3 (1966): 56-77.
58.
Rouse, Joseph
. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987.
59.
Smith, Bruce L. R.American Science Policy since World War II. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1990.
60.
Staudenmaier, John M., S. J.Technology's Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
61.
Ungar, Sheldon
. “Moral Panics, the Military-Industrial Complex, and the Arms Race.”Sociological Quarterly31 (1990): 165-185.
62.
United States. Dept. of Commerce. International Trade Administration
. “An Assessment of U.S. Competitiveness in High Technology Industries.” 1983.
63.
United States. Dept. of Commerce. International Trade Administration
. “Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants.” 1975.
64.
Waring, Stephen P.Taylorism Transformed: Scientific Management Theory since 1945. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991.
65.
Weber, Max
. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. 1904-05. Trans. Talcott Parsons. New York: Scribner, 1958.
66.
Weinberg, Alvin
. “Impact of Large-Scale Science on the United States.”Science134 (1961): 161-164.
67.
Winner, Langdon
. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.
68.
Yates, JoAnne
. Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
69.
Ziman, John
. Public Knowledge: The Social Dimension of Science. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
