This article argues for the long-term value of client-based group projects in an introductory technical communication course. Survey results are presented from 73 former technical communication students with two to seven years of workplace experience. Lasting five to six weeks, these projects are a compromise between a briefer conventional case method and a more lengthy individualized internship or cooperative education experience. The projects reinforce research, analysis, and reporting skills, such as interviewing specialists and conducting survey research, that graduates continue to value highly even after years of workplace writing. When framed as such, client-based projects also encourage students to define and debate public policy issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, Nancy
. “Community, Collaboration, and the Rhetorical Triangle.”Technical Communication Quarterly2 (1993): 63-74.
2.
Anderson, Paul V.“What Survey Research Tells Us about Writing at Work.”Writing in Nonacademic Settings. Ed. Lee Odell and Dixie Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. 3-83.
3.
Bosley, Deborah
. “Cross-Cultural Collaboration: Whose Culture Is It, Anyway?”Technical Communication Quarterly2 (1993): 51-62.
4.
Burnett, Rebecca E.
, and Ann Hill Duin. “Collaboration in Technical Communication: A Research Continuum.”Technical Communication Quarterly2 (1993): 5-21.
5.
Faigley, Lester
, and Thomas P. Miller. “What We Learn from Writing on the Job.”College English44 (1982): 557-569.
6.
Flower, Linda
. “Cognition, Context, and Theory Building.”College Composition and Communication40 (1989): 282-311.
7.
Gilbert
, Ed. “Technical Communication and Writing: Management's Perspective.”Conference on Teaching Technical and Professional Communication. Ann Arbor, MI.1975.
8.
Lay, Mary M.
, and William M. Karis. Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigations in Theory and Practice. Amityville, NY: Baywood, 1991.
9.
Miller, Carolyn R.“Rhetoric and Community: The Problem of the One and the Many.”Defining the New Rhetorics. Ed. Theresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 79-94.
10.
Moore, Sandy
, and Michael Kleine. “Toward an Ethics of Teaching Writing in a Hazardous Context—The University.”Composition Theory for the Postmodern Classroom. Ed. Gary Olson and Sidney Dobrin. Albany: State University of New York, 1994. 93-104.
11.
Olds, Barbara M.“Beyond the Case Book: Teaching Technical Communication through `Real Life' Projects.”The Technical Writing Teacher14 (1987): 11-17.
12.
Olds, Barbara M.
, and Ronald L. Miller. “A Model for Professional Education in the 21st Century: Integrating Humanities and Engineering through Writing.”Conference on College Composition and Communication. San Diego, CA. 2 Apr. 1993.
13.
Olsen, Leslie A.“Computer-Based Writing and Communication: Some Implications for Technical Communication Activities.”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication19 (1989): 97-118.
14.
Olsen, Leslie A.
, and Thomas N. Huckin. Technical Writing and Professional Communication. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
15.
Reither, James
. “Bridging the Gap: Scenic Motives for Collaborative Writing in Workplace and School.”Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Ed. Rachel Spilka. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993. 195-206.
16.
Spilka, Rachel
. “Influencing Workplace Practice: A Challenge for Professional Writing Specialists in Academia.”Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Ed. Rachel Spilka. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993. 207-219.
17.
Storms, C. Gilbert
. “What Business School Graduates Say about the Writing They Do at Work: Implications for the Business Communication Course.”ABCA Bulletin46 (1983): 13-18.
18.
Sullivan, Patricia
, and James Porter. “On Theory, Practice, and Method: Toward a Heuristic Research Methodology for Professional Writing.”Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Ed. Rachel Spilka. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1993. 220-237.
19.
Wickliff, Greg
. “The Case of the Real Group Project.”Collaborative Technical Writing: Theory and Practice. Ed. Richard Louth and Ann Martin Scott. Hammond, LA: Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, 1989. 31-41.
