This article considers on-line documentation's place in a two-year college's technical communication program. Such a course can be successful if instructors (1) emphasize design principles rather than a particular software package; (2) build on rhetorical skills students already possess, while developing the new skills necessary for authoring documents for the computer screen; and (3) acknowledge the need for their own professional development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Authorware. Vers. 3.5. Computer software. Macromedia, 1996. Windows 95, 3.1, 8MB RAM, Windows NT, 16MB RAM, CD-ROM, disk.
2.
Begeman, Michael
, and Jeff Conklin. “The Right Tool for the Job.”Byte Oct. 1988: 255-266.
3.
Bernstein, Mark
. “Deeply Intertwingled Hypertext: The Navigation Problem Reconsidered.”Technical Communication1 (1991): 41-47.
4.
Communitec. Technical Communications Consulting Company. Ann Arbor, MI, 1995.
5.
Grice, Roger A.
, and Lenore S. Ridgway. “Presenting Technical Information in Hypermedia Format: Benefits and Pitfalls.”Technical Communication Quarterly4 (1995): 35-46.
6.
Horton, William
. Designing and Writing Online Documentation. 2nd ed.New York: Wiley, 1994.
Kolosseus, Beverly
, Don Bauer, and Stephen A. Bernhardt. “From Writer to Designer: Modeling Composing Processes in a Hypertext Environment.”Technical Communication Quarterly4 (1995): 79-92.
