Austin, J. L.How to Do Things with Words. Ed. J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisá.2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.
2.
Beveridge, W.I.B.The Art of Scientific Investigation. New York: Vintage, Random House, 1961.
3.
Brown, James Robert
. Smoke and Mirrors: How Science Reflects Reality. London: Routledge, 1994.
4.
Brown, Robert L., Jr.
, and Martin Steinmann, Jr.“Native Readers of Fiction: A Speech-Act and Genre-Rule Approach to Defining Literature.”What Is Literature? Ed. Paul Hernadi. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978. 141-160.
5.
Green, Georgia M.
, and Jerry L. Morgan. “Pragmatics, Grammar, and Discourse.”Radical Pragmatics. Ed. Peter Cole. New York: Academic Press, 1981. 167-181.
6.
Gross, Paul R.
, and Norman Levitt. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
7.
Hagge, John
. “Early Engineering Writing Textbooks and the Anthropological Complexity of Disciplinary Discourse.”Written Communication12 (1995): 439-491.
8.
Hagge, John
. “Ideas about the English Language in Early Technical Writing Textbooks.”Technostyle12.1 (1995): 1-43.
9.
Hagge, John
. “The Value of Formal Conventions in Disciplinary Writing: An Axiological Analysis of Professional Style Manuals.”JBTC8 (1994): 408-461.
10.
Harré, Rom.The Philosophies of Science: An Introductory Survey. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
11.
Harris, R. Allen
. “Rhetoric of Science.”College English53 (1991): 282-307.
12.
Jakobson, Roman
. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.”Style and Language. Ed. Thomas Sebeok. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960. 350-377.
13.
Kitcher, Philip
. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.