The Effectiveness of Leading Grammar/Style Software Packages in Analyzing Business Students' Writing

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of five leading grammar/style analysis software packages in analyzing business students' writing. The software exhibited considerable differences in the following areas: correctly identifying various mechanical and style errors, avoiding annoying and misleading false error messages, and providing helpful remedial advice. No prior research study has empirically compared grammar/style analysis software along all these important dimensions. PowerEdit was found to be the overall superior package, demonsrating proficiency in detecting errors in punctuation, sentence structure, passive voice, and weak wording. The results have significant implications for utilizing grammar/style analysis software to improve students' writing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bean, John C.

“Computerized Word Processing as an Aid to Revision.”

College Composition and Communication 34 (1983): 146-148.

Bogert, Judith . “Improving the Quality of Writing in the Workplace.” Management Communication Quarterly 2 (1989): 328-356.

Borthick, A. Faye , and Ronald L. Clark . “Improving Accounting Majors' Writing Quality: The Role of Language Analysis in Attention Directing.” Issues in Accounting Education 2.1 (1987): 13-27.

Brady, Laura A.

“A Contextual Theory for Business Writing.”

JBTC 7 (1993): 452-471.

Correct Grammar® for Windows™. Vers. 2.0. Computer software. Writing Tools Group. 1992.

Cunningham, Cara . “Buyers Find Grammar Checkers Helpful—But Frustrating.” PC Week 14 Oct. 1991: 141-142.

Editor. Vers. 4.0. Computer software. Modern Language Association, 1991.

Eglowstein, Howard . “Can a Grammar and Style Checker Improve Your Writing?” BYTE Aug. 1991: 238-242.

Fischer, Rick , and Elinor Kelley Grusin . “Grammar Checkers: Programs That May Not Enhance Learning.” Journalism Educator 47.4 (1993): 20-27.

10.

Grammatik™. Vers. 5. Computer software. Reference Software International, 1992.

11.

Hanson, Luett . “Computer-Aided Remediation for Grammar, Punctuation.” Educator 44.4 (1990): 43-49.

12.

Harmon, Jean . “Say It Write!” Word Perfect: The Magazine Aug. 1992: 68-72.

13.

Hawisher, Gail E.

“The Effects of Word Processing on the Revision Strategies of College Freshmen.”

Research in the Teaching of English 21 (1987): 145-159.

14.

Hildebrandt, Herbert W. , et al.

“An Executive Appraisal of Courses Which Best Prepare One for General Management.”

Journal of Business Communication 19.4 (1982): 5-15.

15.

Insley, Robert G.

“Integrating Style Analysis Software into the Basic Business Communication Course.”

Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication 52.4 (1989): 8-11.

16.

Mayer, Kenneth R.

“The Role of Style Analyzers in Business Communication.”

Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication 54.2 (1991): 35-37.

17.

Milone, Michael N., Jr.

“Painless Grammar: Revising with the Help of a Grammar Checker.”

Classroom Computer Learning Apr. 1990: 18-23.

18.

Pearlstein, Gloria . “Performance without Training: How to Improve Your Writing by Using an Automated Grammar/Style Checker.” Performance & Instruction 31.9 (1992): 32-34.

19.

Peek, George S. , et al.

“The Efficacy of Syntax Checkers on the Quality of Accounting Students' Writing.”

Computers and Composition 6.3 (1989): 47-62.

20.

Penrose, John M. , Joel P. Bowman , and Marie E. Flatley . “The Impact of Microcomputers on ABC with Recommendations for Teaching, Writing, and Research.” Journal of Business Communication 24.4 (1987): 79-91.

21.

Power Edit™. Vers. 2.0. Computer software. Oracle, 1992.

22.

Rabinovitz, Rubin . “Write on Target: 15 Writers' Tools.” PC Magazine 24 Sept. 1991: 321-369.

23.

Rader, Martha H. , and Alan Wunsch . “A Survey of Communication Practices of Business School Graduates by Job Category and Undergraduate Major.” Journal of Business Communication 17.2 (1980): 33-41.

24.

Renshaw, Debbie . “The Effect of an Interactive Grammar/Style Checker on Students' Writing Skills.” The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 33.2 (1991): 80-93.

25.

RightWriter®. Vers. 6.0. Computer software. Que Software, 1993.

26.

Safi, Quabidur R.

“Five Programs Provide Lesson in Grammar.”

PC Week 14 Oct. 1991: 141-146.

27.

Scheibal, William J. , and Gary F. Kohut . “An Assessment of Computerized Text Editing Programs.” Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication 54.6 (1991): 38-42.

28.

Schramm, Robert M. , and Grace E. Rich . “CAI vs. Textbook for Grammar and Punctuation Skills.” Business Education Forum 47.4 (1993): 48-52.

29.

Sillery, Bob . “Serious Style Analyzers.” Personal Computing Dec. 1988: 240-241.

30.

Simkin, Mark G.

“Using Grammar Checkers in Technical Writing Classes.”

Technical Communication 38 (1991): 376-377.

31.

Smith, Jan . “Mark Your Words with Grammar Checking Software.” PC Computing Oct. 1992: 243-251.

32.

Smye, Randy . “Style and Usage Software: Mentor Not Judge.” Computers and Composition 6.1 (1988): 47-61.

33.

Sterkel, Karen S. , Mildred I. Johnson , and Douglas D. Sjogren . “Textual Analysis with Computers to Improve the Writing Skills of Business Communication Students.” Journal of Business Communication 23.1 (1986): 43-61.

34.

Sypher, Beverly D. , and Zorn, Theodore E.

“Communication-Related Abilities and Upward Mobility: A Longitudinal Investigation.”

Human Relations Research 12 (1986): 420-431.

35.

Wedell, Allen J. , and Robert Allerheiligen . “Computer Assisted Writing Instruction: Is It Effective?” Journal of Business Communication 28 (1991): 131-140.