Technical-professional communication as praxis, or social action, is extended beyond skill or amoral art into the realm of phronesis, concerned with reasoning about ends rather than means. However, praxis and phronesis are sociologically constructed and, like social-epistemic rhetoric, ideologically defined in the political context by the ethic of expediency enabling deliberative rhetoric. Hitler's use of propaganda to construct praxis and define phronesis in Nazi Germany is examined in terms of the rational but open-ended nature of Aristotle's political-ethical thought, and the implications for our understanding of Aristotelian praxis is discussed. Finally, the failure of professional discourse surrounding the siting of a low-level nuclear waste facility to create a persuasive reality and yet ideologically construct praxis is examined, raising questions concerning the possibility of a deliberative technical rhetoric in U.S. democracy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle
. Eudemian Ethics. Trans. J. Solomon. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984. Vol. 2 of The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols.
2.
Aristotle
. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. W. D. Ross. Rev. by J. O Urmson. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984. Vol. 2 of The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols.
3.
Aristotle
. The Politics. Trans. B. Jowett. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984. Vol. 2 of The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols.
4.
Aristotle
. The Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984. Vol. 2 of The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols.
5.
Art in the Third Reich. Writ. and dir. Peter Adam. Stage. Host Stacy Keach. A&E, Raleigh. 18 May 1989.
6.
Barrett, William
. The Illusion of Technique. New York: Doubleday, 1978.
7.
Bazerman, Charles
. “Scientific Writing as a Social Act: A Review of the Literature of the Sociology of Science.”New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice. Ed. Paul Anderson, R. John Brockmann, and Carolyn Miller. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood, 1983. 156-184.
8.
Berlin, James
. “Response to Comment on `Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.' ”College English51 (1989): 770-777.
9.
Berlin, James
. “Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Classroom.”College English50 (1988): 477-494.
10.
Burke, Kenneth
. “The Rhetoric of Hitler's `Battle.' ”The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. 3rd ed.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
11.
Cooper, Marilyn M.“Model(s) for Educating Professional Communicators.” Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication. San Diego, CA, 11-13 October 1990.
12.
Doheny-Farina, Stephen
. “Writing in an Emerging Organization: An Ethnographic Study.”Written Communication3 (1986): 158-185.
13.
Ellul, Jacques
. The Technological Society. Trans. John Wilkinson. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1964.
14.
Fahnestock, Jeanne
. “Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts.”Written Communication3 (1986): 275-296.
15.
Faigley, Lester
. “Nonacademic Writing: The Social Perspective.”Writing in Nonacademic Settings. Ed. Lee Odell and Dixie Goswami. New York: Guilford, 1985. 231-248.
16.
Farrell, Thomas B.
, and G. Thomas Goodnight. “Accidental Rhetoric: The Root-Metaphors of Three Mile Island.”Communication Monographs48 (1981): 271-300.
17.
Foucault, Michel
. “The Discourse on Language.”The Archaelogy of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon, 1972. 215-237.
18.
Führer: Seduction of a Nation. Prod. and dir. Stephen White. Nar. Alan Howard. PBS. WUNC, Chapel Hill. 20 Nov. 1991.
19.
Garver, Eugene
. Machiavelli and the History of Prudence. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987.
20.
Grimaldi, William M. A.Studies in the Philosophy of Aristotle's Rhetoric. Weisbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH, 1972.
21.
Habermas, Jürgen
. “Technology and Science as `Ideology.' ” Trans. Jeremy Shapiro. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon, 1970. 81-127.
22.
Harrison, Teresa
. “Frameworks for the Study of Writing in Organizational Contexts.”Written Communication9 (1987): 2-23.
23.
Heidegger, Martin
. “The Question Concerning Technology.”The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper, 1977. 3-35.
24.
Heidegger, Martin
. “The Turning.”The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper, 1977. 36-49.
25.
Herndl, Carl G.“Teaching Discourse and Reproducing Culture.”Conference on College Composition and Communication. Boston, 21 Mar. 1991.
26.
Herndl, Carl G.
, Barbara A. Fennell, and Carolyn R. Miller. “Understanding Failures in Organizational Discourse: The Accidents at Three Mile Island and the Shuttle Challenger.”Textual Dynamics of the Profession. Ed. Charles Bazerman and James Paradis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991. 279-305.
Johnson, Nan
. “Ethos and the Aims of Rhetoric.”Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Ed. Robert Connors, Lisa S. Ede, and Andrea Lunsford. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984. 98-114.
30.
Kallendorf, Craig
, and Carol Kallendorf. “Aristotle and the Ethics of Business Communication.”JBTC3 (1989): 54-69.
31.
Katz, Steven B.“The Epistemic Trend in Rhetorical Theory: A Four-Dimensional Review.”Technical Writing Teacher14 (1987): 355-371.
32.
Katz, Steven B.
. “The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust.”College English54 (1992): 255-275.
33.
Katz, Steven B.
. “Narration, Technical Communication, and Culture: The Soul of the New Machine as Narrative Romance.”Constructing Rhetorical Education: From the Classroom to the Community. Ed. Marie Secor and Davida Charney. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992. 382-402.
34.
Leff, Michael C.“In Search of Ariadne's Thread: A Review of the Recent Literature on Rhetorical Theory.”Central States Speech Journal29 (1978): 73-91.
35.
Lloyd, G.E.R.Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
36.
MacIntyre, Alasdair
. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.
37.
Marx, Leo
. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
Miller, Carolyn R.
. “The Polis as Rhetorical Community.”The International Society for the History of Rhetoric. Göttingen, West Germany, 26-29 July 1989.
40.
Miller, Carolyn R.
. “Technology as a Form of Consciousness: A Study of Contemporary Ethos.”Central States Speech Journal29 (1978): 228-236.
41.
Miller, Carolyn R.
. “What's Practical About Technical Writing?”Technical Writing Theory and Practice. Ed. Bertie Fearing and W. Keats Sparrow. New York: Modern Language Association, 1989. 14-24.
42.
Moss, Jean Dietz
, ed. Rhetoric and Praxis: The Contribution of Rhetoric to Practical Reasoning. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1986.
43.
Myers, Greg
. “The Social Construction of Two Biology Proposals.”Written Communication2 (1985): 219-245.
44.
Myers, Greg
. “Texts as Knowledge Claims: The Social Construction of Two Biology Articles.”Social Studies of Science15 (1985): 593-630.
45.
Nelkin, Dorothy
. “The Political Impact of Technical Expertise.”Social Studies of Science5 (1975): 35-54.
46.
North Carolina Low-Level Radioactive Waste Incinerator. Open/net. Prod. North Carolina Agency for Public Telecommunications. Raleigh, 19 Nov. 1991.
47.
North Carolina Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Authority
. Phase 1 Screening Study: Identification of Potentially Suitable Areas. Greensboro, NC: Ebasco Services in Association with Law Engineering, 1988.
48.
Odell, Lee
, and Dixie Goswami. “Writing in a Non-Academic Setting.”Research in the Teaching of English16 (1982): 201-221.
49.
Olsen, Leslie A.
, and Thomas N. Huckin. Technical Writing and Professional Communication. 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
50.
Popper, Karl R.The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. 2. New York: Harper, 1962. 2 vols.
51.
Quandahl, Ellen
. “Comment on `Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.' ”College English52 (1990): 343-345.
52.
Rowland, Robert C.
, and Deanna F. Womack. “Aristotle's View of Ethical Rhetoric.”Rhetoric Society Quarterly15 (1985): 13-31.
53.
Schilb, John
. “Comment on `Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.' ”College English51 (1989): 769-770.
54.
Scriven, Karen
. “Comment on `Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class.' ”College English51 (1989): 764-765.
55.
Self, Lois S.“Rhetoric and Phronesis: The Aristotelian Ideal.”Philosophy and Rhetoric12 (1979): 130-145.
56.
Skolimowski, Henry K.“The Structure of Thinking in Technology.”Technology and Culture7 (1966): 371-383.
57.
Speer, Albert
. Inside the Third Reich. Trans. Richard and Clara Winston. Macmillan, 1970; New York: Avon, 1971.
58.
Stein, George H.
, ed. Hitler. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
59.
Sullivan, Dale L.“Political-Ethical Implications of Defining Technical Communication as a Practice.”Journal of Advanced Communication10 (1990): 375-386.
60.
Winner, Langdon
. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977.
61.
Winner, Langdon
. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?”Daedalus109 (1980): 121-123.
62.
Wood, Ellen Meiksins
, and Neal Wood. Class Ideology and Ancient Political Theory: Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle in Social Context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978.
63.
Yahil, Leni
. The Holocaust: The Fate of European Jewry, 1932-1945. Trans. Ina Friedman and Haya Galai. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
